C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Buying 2012 C63 coupe with 75k miles for 35-40k CAD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-01-2017, 02:29 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
NotABaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 900
Received 113 Likes on 87 Posts
2012 C63, 2014 E550
Buying 2012 C63 coupe with 75k miles for 35-40k CAD




Still has extended warranty from Mercedes until January 2019. I read that this is transferable at a dealership after showing proof of transfer and updated maintenance records, correct?

I can probably negotiate the purchase price to around $35000 CAD.

Car has 75000km, no accidents, serviced every time at MB dealer, bunch of options, etc.

Barring any glaring issues from the pre-inspection, and I dont suspect there will be any since this car is regularly taken to the MB dealer under warranty, is this a great deal?
Old 05-01-2017, 03:02 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
JPetros2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Coast
Posts: 408
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 AMG GTS
i think that's a steal at that price. is it 75,000 miles or km?
Old 05-01-2017, 04:02 PM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
NotABaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 900
Received 113 Likes on 87 Posts
2012 C63, 2014 E550
Originally Posted by JPetros2008
i think that's a steal at that price. is it 75,000 miles or km?

Yeaah... feels like s teal too. Its in KM
Old 05-01-2017, 07:59 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
NotaBaller: It sounds like a decent deal, but I don't think I would call it a steal. Here's why:

4 weeks ago, I bought a 2012 C63 with the P30 power increase AND, I Think, every option available including the 19" Multispoke wheels (I haven't found any option yet that it does not have, but it's possible I missed 1 or 2). It had 43,385 km (26,900 miles) on it the day I bought it. It is so nice that everyone who sees it remarks that they assumed it was a brand new car until I told them otherwise.

I live in Canada, like you do. I am on Vancouver Island, where there is limited dealer competition, because there are only 2 MB dealers on the island, and they are both owned by the same company!

Now I traded an almost new (6100 miles) 2016 (not 2017) Mustang GT for it. The Mustang was a GT but had zero options on it. The proverbial "stripper". No leather, no navigation, no performance pcakage, etc. However, it had a Roush kit (cold air intake, exhaust, tune) on it that bumped power from 435 crank hp to about 475 crank hp. It was a nice "performance" car despite having zero options.

It is hard to figure out exactly what I truly paid for the C63, since they overvalued my trade, and they also agreed to pay for a $3000 deluxe ("Ultimate") 4-year aftermarket warranty because the 2012 C63 had just over exactly 5 years on it since its in-service date.

My net difference before taxes and fees was $14,500.

I figure that after taking out the $3000 fo the warranty, the true difference becomes $11,500. Assume that the Mustang was worth $30,000 (It could not really have been worth any more since I paid $33,350 for it last October 3rd), and despite the low miles, ALL cars depreciate like stink the moment they are driven off the lot. That makes the true price I paid for the C63 $41,500 at most, in Canadian dollars.

This is just under $31,000 U.S. at the current exchange rate.

There was another C63 at the same dealership that was a 2011 Sedan with much more limited options, including no performance package, and no visual pizzazz compared to my car. It had about 45,000 miles on it I think. The asking price was $37,500 as I recall.

I know it is only one car to compare to, and I realize car costs vary a lot by geographic area. For example, dealers in BC do down-value cars from Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, and Saskatchwan, because of the corrosion damage done by the harsh winters in those areas.

But these 2 cars are at least a Canadian reference point for you.

Jim G
Old 05-01-2017, 08:42 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,219
Received 1,572 Likes on 925 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
NotaBaller: It sounds like a decent deal, but I don't think I would call it a steal. Here's why:
.
.
.
That makes the true price I paid for the C63 $41,500 at most, in Canadian dollars.
If the 35K CAD is just a deal, are you suggesting you over paid for yours?

35K CAD for a 2012 with 75k km is a steal if you ask me. Well below VMR...

EDIT:

VMR
Wholesale: 41750
Retail: 46225

Last edited by Jasonoff; 05-01-2017 at 08:47 PM.
Old 05-01-2017, 09:15 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
Originally Posted by Jasonoff
If the 35K CAD is just a deal, are you suggesting you over paid for yours?

35K CAD for a 2012 with 75k km is a steal if you ask me. Well below VMR...

EDIT:

VMR
Wholesale: 41750
Retail: 46225
JasonOff: Ok, you asked. Here's my logic on why the $35k to $40k price range is decent but not "a steal":

The OP's target car has 75k km on it. 75k km is more than 43k km (almost double). The difference is also 75k-43k = 32k km = 19.8k miles. Each extra mile on a car diminishes its value. You can argue how much per mile, but:
- at $0.10 per mile, that's a $1980 diminished value
- at $0.15 per mile, that's a $2970 diminished value
(Leases generally penalize you for excess miles at higher rates then these)

No P30 Performance Package.

Don't know what other options the OP's target car has (he has not specified) but mine appears to have all of them. If his is missing even 1 or 2, you are talking a lot of difference in the car's value.

I interpret that the OP's contemplated price range of $35k to $40k means the dealer is asking $40k, and The OP is thinking he can get it for as low as $35k. For the reasons above, I think that price range is decent, but not "a steal". I certainly do not regard the price I paid for mine as a steal. I think it was a fair price from an honest dealer to an honest buyer, but I would not call it "great". Regardless of its prime condition, it is a 5 year old car with an "as sold" price that is about 42% of what a brand new one similarly equipped would cost at this dealership. That's neither outlandishly low or high. At least that's the way I see it.

Also, consider the 2nd car I mentioned in my posting above (2011 model year Sedan with asking price of $37,500 and unsold "for a long time") as another benchmark.

By the way, what is "VMR"?? Is that similar to Black Book or NDA? If so, if it a CANADIAN price guide or a U.S. one? Obviously, it needs to be a Canadian one to be usable in this situation. I'm asking because you did not say.

Jim G

Last edited by JimGnitecki; 05-01-2017 at 09:20 PM.
Old 05-02-2017, 12:20 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
JPetros2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Coast
Posts: 408
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 AMG GTS
well if he can get it for $35k cad...that'd be just over $25k usd. that's AT LEAST $10k less than any other c63 coupe currently for sale in the US that i found in a quick search regardless of options included. then he's got no accidents, service records, and a warranty on top of that?

that's a steal. not sure how you can try and even attempt to argue otherwise.
Old 05-02-2017, 12:23 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
Originally Posted by JPetros2008
well if he can get it for $35k cad...that'd be just over $25k usd. that's AT LEAST $10k less than any other c63 coupe currently for sale in the US that i found in a quick search regardless of options included. then he's got no accidents, service records, and a warranty on top of that?

that's a steal. not sure how you can try and even attempt to argue otherwise.
1. Canadian market is evidently different than U.S. market

2. I guess I got a steal on mine too then, if you say so.

Jim G
Old 05-02-2017, 12:25 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
fallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 476
Received 95 Likes on 66 Posts
2014 E550, 2015 E63S, 2017 G63 - RIP
Definitely a VERY good deal!
Old 05-02-2017, 12:34 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by NotABaller



Still has extended warranty from Mercedes until January 2019. I read that this is transferable at a dealership after showing proof of transfer and updated maintenance records, correct?

I can probably negotiate the purchase price to around $35000 CAD.

Car has 75000km, no accidents, serviced every time at MB dealer, bunch of options, etc.

Barring any glaring issues from the pre-inspection, and I dont suspect there will be any since this car is regularly taken to the MB dealer under warranty, is this a great deal?
If it is the SecureDrive warranty then for sure it is transferable as long as it is done through the issuing dealer within 30 days of the sale.
Old 05-02-2017, 12:39 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by NotABaller



Still has extended warranty from Mercedes until January 2019. I read that this is transferable at a dealership after showing proof of transfer and updated maintenance records, correct?

I can probably negotiate the purchase price to around $35000 CAD.

Car has 75000km, no accidents, serviced every time at MB dealer, bunch of options, etc.

Barring any glaring issues from the pre-inspection, and I dont suspect there will be any since this car is regularly taken to the MB dealer under warranty, is this a great deal?
Mine is a 2013 Sedan fully loaded with 46000km and the extended warranty to 100000 km or 2021. The market for 2013s seems to run between $50000 CDN and $55000 CDN without consideration of the warranty which in my case is the SecureDrive Elite package worth about $4000. If it is as you suggest available at $35000 CDN is as good as you describe AND the warranty will deal with any potential headbolt issues then it seems a good deal. Just be sure you do excellent due diligence including Carfax etc.
Old 05-02-2017, 12:56 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
realjones88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 446
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
2012 C63 P31 sedan
Originally Posted by Alex.currie44
If it is as you suggest available at $35000 CDN is as good as you describe AND the warranty will deal with any potential headbolt issues then it seems a good deal.
There are no headbolt issues on facelift cars
Old 05-02-2017, 08:42 AM
  #13  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
NotABaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 900
Received 113 Likes on 87 Posts
2012 C63, 2014 E550
Looks like owner wants 38000. Still a good deal imo
Old 05-02-2017, 08:50 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Alex.currie44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Sidney, BC
Posts: 1,501
Received 64 Likes on 57 Posts
2009 SLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by realjones88
There are no headbolt issues on facelift cars
Yup! Got confused on which post I was reading and missed the 2012. So sorry.
Old 05-02-2017, 09:10 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,219
Received 1,572 Likes on 925 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
By the way, what is "VMR"?? Is that similar to Black Book or NDA? If so, if it a CANADIAN price guide or a U.S. one? Obviously, it needs to be a Canadian one to be usable in this situation. I'm asking because you did not say.

Jim G
http://www.vmrcanada.com/

Similar to CBB (http://www.canadianblackbook.com/) but seems to be way more accurate, for Ontario at least.
Old 05-02-2017, 09:11 AM
  #16  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
Originally Posted by NotABaller
Looks like owner wants 38000. Still a good deal imo
So this is a private seller deal, not a dealership deal?

Normally, private sales cars sell for less than dealership cars, because:

- You get absolutely zero protection against buying a car with one or more unresolved or serious problems, since, unlike a dealer, a private seller does not have to protect his reputation with the public, nor is he effectively restrained to be honest in his statements to you

- The Title transfer and licensing must be done by the buyer, which is a lot less convenient than having the dealership do it for you

- If the seller still owes money on the car, the mechanics of the deal become a lot more complicated for a number of reasons too complex to go into here on a forum thread, and they are critical to ensure that you reliably get a clean title

- It is unusual for the owner of a costly car to ell it privately, because if he trades it in instead, he pays sales taxes on only the difference in value between the trade-in and the new car. If he sells the car privately, and then buys another car, he must pay sales tax on the entire purchase price. So, when an owner sells privately, it is sometimes because there is a compelling reason that makes it undesirable or impossible to trade the car into a dealership, e.g. accident history (reported or unreported), flood damage, known serious defect that does not necessarily manifest to a buyer who only test drives it for a short time, "washed" salvage title, etc.

I have been buying and selling my personal cars and motorcycles for about a half century, and have thus been involved ina lmost 100 deals. Be prudent and cautious in pursuing a private deal.

One particularly unusual incident stands out: The seller of a high performance motorcycle placed an ad with an attractive price. I responded. The bike checked out fine on the test drive. The seller had a good title. No money owing. I made a cash offer that was even lower than his attractive selling price (had the full cash price in my pocket). He accepted it. I paid, got a receipt, got a signed transfer, and transferred the ownership the same day.

One week later, I was visited by a police officer who seemed fixated on exactly what date and time I had bought the motorcycle. I responded honestly and produced proof. The officer thanked me and gave me the background. The seller had been involved in an incident reported to police involving the bike, and that prompted the seller to immediately advertise it at an attractive price in the hope that a quick sale would obscure the ownership on the date of the incident (i.e. blame the buyer for whatever the seller had done while riding the bike). I was fortunate that I had a properly dated receipt. Incredible what some people will try to do, and the trouble it can cause for others.

Jim G
Old 05-02-2017, 09:14 AM
  #17  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
Originally Posted by Jasonoff
http://www.vmrcanada.com/

Similar to CBB (http://www.canadianblackbook.com/) but seems to be way more accurate, for Ontario at least.
And we all know that such price guides are always deadly accurate, right?

So, in that case, ok, I confess. I may have gotten a better deal than I thought I did on mine. I'll tell my wife!

Jim G
Old 05-02-2017, 09:22 AM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,219
Received 1,572 Likes on 925 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
And we all know that such price guides are always deadly accurate, right?

So, in that case, ok, I confess. I may have gotten a better deal than I thought I did on mine. I'll tell my wife!

Jim G
I have found VMR to be very accurate. You trash it and only just heard about it today. Interesting...
Old 05-02-2017, 09:22 AM
  #19  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
NotABaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 900
Received 113 Likes on 87 Posts
2012 C63, 2014 E550
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
So this is a private seller deal, not a dealership deal?

Normally, private sales cars sell for less than dealership cars, because:

- You get absolutely zero protection against buying a car with one or more unresolved or serious problems, since, unlike a dealer, a private seller does not have to protect his reputation with the public, nor is he effectively restrained to be honest in his statements to you

- The Title transfer and licensing must be done by the buyer, which is a lot less convenient than having the dealership do it for you

- If the seller still owes money on the car, the mechanics of the deal become a lot more complicated for a number of reasons too complex to go into here on a forum thread, and they are critical to ensure that you reliably get a clean title

- It is unusual for the owner of a costly car to ell it privately, because if he trades it in instead, he pays sales taxes on only the difference in value between the trade-in and the new car. If he sells the car privately, and then buys another car, he must pay sales tax on the entire purchase price. So, when an owner sells privately, it is sometimes because there is a compelling reason that makes it undesirable or impossible to trade the car into a dealership, e.g. accident history (reported or unreported), flood damage, known serious defect that does not necessarily manifest to a buyer who only test drives it for a short time, "washed" salvage title, etc.

I have been buying and selling my personal cars and motorcycles for about a half century, and have thus been involved ina lmost 100 deals. Be prudent and cautious in pursuing a private deal.

One particularly unusual incident stands out: The seller of a high performance motorcycle placed an ad with an attractive price. I responded. The bike checked out fine on the test drive. The seller had a good title. No money owing. I made a cash offer that was even lower than his attractive selling price (had the full cash price in my pocket). He accepted it. I paid, got a receipt, got a signed transfer, and transferred the ownership the same day.

One week later, I was visited by a police officer who seemed fixated on exactly what date and time I had bought the motorcycle. I responded honestly and produced proof. The officer thanked me and gave me the background. The seller had been involved in an incident reported to police involving the bike, and that prompted the seller to immediately advertise it at an attractive price in the hope that a quick sale would obscure the ownership on the date of the incident (i.e. blame the buyer for whatever the seller had done while riding the bike). I was fortunate that I had a properly dated receipt. Incredible what some people will try to do, and the trouble it can cause for others.

Jim G
Thanks for the concern and detailed reply. Seller has shown me periodic service records at a MB dealer, why would there be any hidden problems that he's selling it for? Unless he did something dumb and voided the warranty and is trying to pull a quick one. I'll check for that I guess
Old 05-02-2017, 12:01 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
realjones88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 446
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
2012 C63 P31 sedan
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
- It is unusual for the owner of a costly car to ell it privately, because if he trades it in instead, he pays sales taxes on only the difference in value between the trade-in and the new car. If he sells the car privately, and then buys another car, he must pay sales tax on the entire purchase price.
Great advice - not sure about Canada, but in the Communistwealth of Virginia you get no such credit. Also true for like five other states. Also in VA they are kind enough to tax you again every year on the value of the car (some counties).
Old 05-02-2017, 02:30 PM
  #21  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
Originally Posted by Jasonoff
I have found VMR to be very accurate. You trash it and only just heard about it today. Interesting...
Sorry. I did not mean to sound like I was trashing VMR. I have never used it. I have used NADA, Edmunds, Kelly, and Black Book (Canada). I have found them to usually be somewhere in the ballpark, but often incorrect enough to make a notable difference for a buyer or seller. Unfortuntely, at least some of them seem to use "formulas" for determining current value (i.e. what a car should be worth per their expert opinion), instead of reflecting current market conditions. Others gather their data from car dealers who obviously have a vested interest in depressing trade-in values and inflating retail sale prices.

On my deal described above, I felt I did not have to work very hard to get the price I got. I simply stated my concerns at each stage of the 3 day buying process to my salesperson, the store manager, and the finance manager, and they responded with what I regarded as a fair-to-both-side outcome.

I thunk it is smart to check all of the available "book" sources, but it is also essential to check the local market conditions and adjust book values to the current reality on the street.

Jim G
Old 05-02-2017, 02:44 PM
  #22  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
Originally Posted by NotABaller
Thanks for the concern and detailed reply. Seller has shown me periodic service records at a MB dealer, why would there be any hidden problems that he's selling it for? Unless he did something dumb and voided the warranty and is trying to pull a quick one. I'll check for that I guess
Check specifically for evidence of any diagnostic visit that reported one or more issues but did not result in an actual repair. This could mean the repair was viewed as a "wear" issue versus a "defect" issue. Many warrantieds distinguish between the 2 quite vividly. So, for example, a transmission control module failure in a transmission is covered under warranty as a "defect". But clutch wear (like in an MCT MB transmission with its wet clutch), is not covered because language in the warranty contract excludes "wear" - and often specifically on things like clutch plates, brake pads, rotors, etc.

Also some aftermarket warranties specifically exclude some vene non-wear items, because the warranty company has determined, for example, that fancy electronic systems constitute an unduly high proportion of their total payouts. I'm not kidding. Check the language of some aftermarket warranties.

In most cases however that I have seen, the usual reason that a seller is selling a costly vehicle versus trading it to get the sales tax advantage, is because there has been reported or unreported flooding or accident, that has been repaired but is still very evident to any experienced dealership car buyer. Example: I once had a Honda Civic that suffered some hail damage. The insurance repair looked perfect to me. But when I went to sell that car, the dealership buyer walked towards the car, and when still 0ver 50 feet from the car, asked me "How bad was the overall damage?" Those guys don't miss a thing, but we non-pros do.

Flood damage is also very hard to see, but manifests as weird and unpredictable electrical issues that prove costly or impossible to solve.

I seriously doubt that any of these issues are present in any given car you might look at, but it is smart to do strong due diligence, as the costs of not seeing a problem before buying tend to be significant. I don't want to scare you though. Just use your eyes and ask good uestions, and if you have the inclination, and can get the seller's permission,take the car to a mechanic familiar with C63s and ask for a pro inspection.

Jim G
Old 05-02-2017, 03:14 PM
  #23  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
NotABaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 900
Received 113 Likes on 87 Posts
2012 C63, 2014 E550
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
So this is a private seller deal, not a dealership deal?

Normally, private sales cars sell for less than dealership cars, because:

- You get absolutely zero protection against buying a car with one or more unresolved or serious problems, since, unlike a dealer, a private seller does not have to protect his reputation with the public, nor is he effectively restrained to be honest in his statements to you

- The Title transfer and licensing must be done by the buyer, which is a lot less convenient than having the dealership do it for you

- If the seller still owes money on the car, the mechanics of the deal become a lot more complicated for a number of reasons too complex to go into here on a forum thread, and they are critical to ensure that you reliably get a clean title

- It is unusual for the owner of a costly car to ell it privately, because if he trades it in instead, he pays sales taxes on only the difference in value between the trade-in and the new car. If he sells the car privately, and then buys another car, he must pay sales tax on the entire purchase price. So, when an owner sells privately, it is sometimes because there is a compelling reason that makes it undesirable or impossible to trade the car into a dealership, e.g. accident history (reported or unreported), flood damage, known serious defect that does not necessarily manifest to a buyer who only test drives it for a short time, "washed" salvage title, etc.

I have been buying and selling my personal cars and motorcycles for about a half century, and have thus been involved ina lmost 100 deals. Be prudent and cautious in pursuing a private deal.

One particularly unusual incident stands out: The seller of a high performance motorcycle placed an ad with an attractive price. I responded. The bike checked out fine on the test drive. The seller had a good title. No money owing. I made a cash offer that was even lower than his attractive selling price (had the full cash price in my pocket). He accepted it. I paid, got a receipt, got a signed transfer, and transferred the ownership the same day.

One week later, I was visited by a police officer who seemed fixated on exactly what date and time I had bought the motorcycle. I responded honestly and produced proof. The officer thanked me and gave me the background. The seller had been involved in an incident reported to police involving the bike, and that prompted the seller to immediately advertise it at an attractive price in the hope that a quick sale would obscure the ownership on the date of the incident (i.e. blame the buyer for whatever the seller had done while riding the bike). I was fortunate that I had a properly dated receipt. Incredible what some people will try to do, and the trouble it can cause for others.

Jim G
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
Check specifically for evidence of any diagnostic visit that reported one or more issues but did not result in an actual repair. This could mean the repair was viewed as a "wear" issue versus a "defect" issue. Many warrantieds distinguish between the 2 quite vividly. So, for example, a transmission control module failure in a transmission is covered under warranty as a "defect". But clutch wear (like in an MCT MB transmission with its wet clutch), is not covered because language in the warranty contract excludes "wear" - and often specifically on things like clutch plates, brake pads, rotors, etc.

Also some aftermarket warranties specifically exclude some vene non-wear items, because the warranty company has determined, for example, that fancy electronic systems constitute an unduly high proportion of their total payouts. I'm not kidding. Check the language of some aftermarket warranties.

In most cases however that I have seen, the usual reason that a seller is selling a costly vehicle versus trading it to get the sales tax advantage, is because there has been reported or unreported flooding or accident, that has been repaired but is still very evident to any experienced dealership car buyer. Example: I once had a Honda Civic that suffered some hail damage. The insurance repair looked perfect to me. But when I went to sell that car, the dealership buyer walked towards the car, and when still 0ver 50 feet from the car, asked me "How bad was the overall damage?" Those guys don't miss a thing, but we non-pros do.

Flood damage is also very hard to see, but manifests as weird and unpredictable electrical issues that prove costly or impossible to solve.

I seriously doubt that any of these issues are present in any given car you might look at, but it is smart to do strong due diligence, as the costs of not seeing a problem before buying tend to be significant. I don't want to scare you though. Just use your eyes and ask good uestions, and if you have the inclination, and can get the seller's permission,take the car to a mechanic familiar with C63s and ask for a pro inspection.

Jim G
Thanks Jim. This is very good advice and you brought up a good point that got me thinking.

The seller said he bought a GTR. If what you're saying regarding taxes applies in my province, then he must have got really low balled by dealership tradeins. Or they wouldn't accept it for any of your listed reasons.

Or perhaps he bought the GTR privTely as well. That explains everything lol
Old 05-02-2017, 05:35 PM
  #24  
Super Member
 
JimGnitecki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 549
Received 83 Likes on 49 Posts
2012 Mercedes C63 AMG S
Originally Posted by NotABaller
Thanks Jim. This is very good advice and you brought up a good point that got me thinking.

The seller said he bought a GTR. If what you're saying regarding taxes applies in my province, then he must have got really low balled by dealership tradeins. Or they wouldn't accept it for any of your listed reasons.

Or perhaps he bought the GTR privTely as well. That explains everything lol
Glad to be of help. If you do your due diligence, I'm sure you'll come out fine on buying a C63. I have been very pleased with mine so far.

Jim G
Old 05-02-2017, 06:41 PM
  #25  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
NotABaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Toronto
Posts: 900
Received 113 Likes on 87 Posts
2012 C63, 2014 E550
Originally Posted by JimGnitecki
Glad to be of help. If you do your due diligence, I'm sure you'll come out fine on buying a C63. I have been very pleased with mine so far.

Jim G
Just met with the guy. Hes a 19 year old kid living with his parents and working with his dad. Driveway full of luxury cars in a house near mine.

Seems like a very honest kid, and he told me he already paid 55-60k (I forget) for a used GTR, and its sitting in a town 200km away from us because they truly don't have space in the garage to store it.

I guess that explains why he didnt trade in to a dealer.

Gave him $300 deposit (lol) and agreed to meet up on Saturday to get an inspection, and if that goes smoothly, which it 99% will since it just went through the same process for a previous buyer who flopped after giving the deposit, then we'll do the sale.

Final price, CAD $37500 less any issues found from the inspection. A good deal IMO


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Buying 2012 C63 coupe with 75k miles for 35-40k CAD



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.