arun.6ix

ok sir.

604 C63

Its magic!!! Yaaaaaayyyyyy!!!!!

skratch77

Ok ask for all the run condition on the sheet or just ask for the dynojet files and we can run them on the software and get all the details.

You have a healthy car but it's not really making that much power .

You are making more power than me with all my mods on your stock baseline lol.

DavesMeanE's

I will

Ya'll are gonna see a lot of high power coming up here soon - Go check out the other thread... 211 E63 M156 making like 498.9 with basically the same mod package as this C63.

"Remote tune Dyno Results" Done @ Real St. in Orlando

It's real folks. Need to just get them on the E also!

Thanks

Dave

arun.6ix

Thanks for not bashing me and putting me down. I will get all the information from Vlad and share it.

skratch77

I'm taking my car to the real Dyno tommorow! New England dragway! If you can post a 126mph trap speed you will shut us all up

604 C63

How do you account for his stock numbers then?

m a x i m u s

Guys, I think we are being a little too harsh on the OP here. He's just excited and is sharing his results. On a side note (and no, I did not search, lol), what is the baseline WHP on a 507?

DavesMeanE's

I'd say 126mph is a little optimistic for 500whp, I think 121-122mph would be a good trap speed for a C63 making that power...

Maybe a 123-124mph if you had a nice NegDA.

But either way - skratch77 is 100% correct, dyno numbers are good, but the track is where it gets verified.

Thanks

Dave

BLKROKT

I'm glad I didn't offer to eat my sneaker this time then.

I'm a current EC customer. Where can I bring my car in the NYC area to have this magic done. What is the process - how much dyno time does one need to book, and what's the cost. Is this all still loaded onto the MyGenius so I can swap files. Can you please post details for all to see, because frankly this is still difficult to believe. People have been chasing these kind of results, with much more heavily modified cars on ragged-edge custom tunes, for a very long time.

BLKROKT

I trap 122mph at full weight as do many others who have dynoed well under 500whp.

AhhMyyGawd

+1. lets tone down the animosity here.

604 C63

Just over 400 I think. One guy on here was 415, and that was regarded a unicorn.

You walk into any car forum on this planet and post eye-popping freak numbers and the crowd is gonna stand up and yell for you to sit down and STFU so I think this an expected and not unreasonable response here.

DavesMeanE's

Not doubting..

You got a slip? What was DA?

Thanks

Dave

604 C63

Fill yer boots.

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...0mph-list.html

SuckaGDog

+1. I'm in the market for a tune soon and am curious of this info as well.

BLKROKT

It's all on the 1/4 mile list. I run at Atco, DA is always good. Last time out it was -20. DA adjusted when it's not so good, I'm still consistently in the 121-122mph range. That's not a 500whp trap on a car that weighs 4100 with me in it.

604 C63

Im still waiting for the answer to this one. Cos lets start with baseline and work our way forward from there shall we? Kind how it gets done.

So how the H-E-Double Hockey Sticks is OP posting 450 when stock?

Cos thats where disbelief begins.....
and it stands to reason that if we cant explain that then all numbers are hokum.

BLKROKT

Exactly D. No "stock" C63 is going to baseline at 450whp unless the dyno is broken.

DavesMeanE's

I have had one on my dyno that baselined at 416whp stock. 100% informational.

Thanks

Dave

m a x i m u s

Wowzers, 100hp loss from crank to wheels? I know there's loss but that's nuts. That makes my non-507 pretty much a sackless unick.

Schulminator

Interested as well.


Mine made 476whp with Jerry at the wheel at your Orlando location w/canned EC tune and mods in sig below. I was hoping to custom tune it there and he said there wasn't much he could improve upon.... thinking I might make a couple more runs and send the files over. Love to pickup another 20+whp....

Infiniti

I am not trying to hijack a thread or whatnot but i do have some input.

I enjoy reading the forum and some of you guys have the funniest responses. Allow me to throw myself in the fire pit.

here is my thread https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...o-results.html

I have had an E55 and a C63 prior to this E. this car felt great from second i got it, it just ran good. I may not be a full expert but i am not the biggest noob either. I went to real st because they have a good reputation and are really about posting times not dyno numbers. Dyno numbers as we all know mean nothing so i went there to use the dyno for what its meant to be used for, a tuning tool.The first two runs were on the shelf tune, first was 470hp 419tq after Jerry sent back 3 tunes (the car made more each time) it did 498 and i was ready to go home, im sure he could have squeezed a few more out of it.

470/475whp with my mods is pretty much around the mark give or take a few from what i've seen on the forum, car made more power with each file he sent over, same dyno in a 2-3 hr span, thats impossible?

Since i just got the car im always goofing off on the throttle hard, when i left the dyno i could INSTANTLY tell the difference in power, pretty much felt like i just put headers on again.

EC charged $100 an hour (2-3hrs is whats needed) and then you have to pay the dyno whatever they want. from first run until we were finished i picked up 28whp and 30tq. maybe it was the OBX LTH's?

500whp without at least a custom tune is tough to believe.Dyno's spit out big numbers everyday B

604 C63

Sounds about right. So... OP is saying he baselined at 450.
That does not compute, which is why I find the tuned numbers suspect.
Or one of the reasons anyway.

604 C63

TBH I'm not sure how much of that is drivetrain loss and how much of that is correction for the inherent inaccuracy of using this method vs dyno'ing at the crank. If that makes sense. Maybe someone else can speak to that. But the correction factor for that is pretty generic whether it be AMG, BMW or Chevy and depends more on type of dyno used, weather, operator etc.

I don't think our drivetrain loss is exceptionally high compared to any other car is what I'm saying and really it's a bit of a guesstimate situation.