500WHP C63 Edition 507 DYNO'ed
The following users liked this post:
djr48312 (02-15-2021)
#102
MBWorld Fanatic!
#103
MBWorld Fanatic!
To be hung up on whatever it did before also doesn't make much sense - It's about the same as comparing an 2008 C63 to a 507 baseline... it doesn't matter much what they started with - one they are FBO, it's been widely accepted that they ALL will make about the same 470-480whp
It's like it's not cool that any one is disbelieving and yet at the same time you want us to be protesting more, in both threads. Can't have it both way boys and for what ever reason this thread is leading the conversation. More inflammatory initial comment, higher numbers , whatever but Infiniti needs to stop being hurt about it.
It's me that's hung up on what this car did before, stock, and not talking about Infiniti's thread as a result of him not having a stock baseline.
I think I have explained why a few times. I get the concept of what you are saying re 2008 vs 507 or P31 or any other being the same after being tuned. BUT. The ONLY thing we know for reasonably certain about either of these dynos and their results is what this 507 should be running for stock power. When it dynos much higher than that it throws everything else into question and we might as well be throwing darts in the dark.
I'm not chucking **** at Infinitis results cos for all I know he MAY be pushing the 490. I have no reason to give him a hard time for his results. Others who are more technically proficient can take him to task for that if need be.
I'm just trying to stay within my proficiency zone here, and I know that 507 does not punch 450 stock. If it did AMG would be calling it the 540 Edition. As a result, I'm calling that dyno test into question and by extension the numbers when tuned and headered.
Last edited by 604 C63; 05-21-2017 at 07:15 PM.
#104
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,063
Received 2,845 Likes
on
1,678 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
I'll call you this week Dave. We'll get to the bottom of this. Would love to have another safe 30whp on top of my EC V5 tune. And people here know by now that I don't hold back my opinions, good or bad....
You said something interesting above about (paraphrasing) seeing a few 500whp cars on E85. Are you saying that's what's happening here, because that detail has been left out and would obviously change everything
And for Infinity, I don't care about you or your dyno-queen car. If you're going to post trap speeds, that's when I'll be interested. Otherwise... yawn.
You said something interesting above about (paraphrasing) seeing a few 500whp cars on E85. Are you saying that's what's happening here, because that detail has been left out and would obviously change everything
And for Infinity, I don't care about you or your dyno-queen car. If you're going to post trap speeds, that's when I'll be interested. Otherwise... yawn.
The following users liked this post:
djr48312 (02-15-2021)
#105
MBWorld Fanatic!
Why are you posting a car with ethanol and the same mods then claiming see you can get 500whp yeah you can supercharge it and run stock exhaust and probably do 500whp too what people are arguing is headers and a tune ain't getting you to 500 on a m156...
#106
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Georgetown, TX
Posts: 541
Received 129 Likes
on
96 Posts
93' 500E, 95' Corolla
Sorry - that was confusing...
NO - these cars ARE NOT on E85
It's something else - I guess I should have posted the STD, and SAE results as well.
FYI I see closer to a 2% drop going from STD to SAE.
Sorry again that was confusing.
In other news - PM me if you are FBO on an EC V5/V6 tune and interested in paying for some dyno time.
Thanks
Dave
NO - these cars ARE NOT on E85
It's something else - I guess I should have posted the STD, and SAE results as well.
FYI I see closer to a 2% drop going from STD to SAE.
Sorry again that was confusing.
In other news - PM me if you are FBO on an EC V5/V6 tune and interested in paying for some dyno time.
Thanks
Dave
#107
MBWorld Fanatic!
Putting OP's STD result (God that sounds bad lol) of 500 right the same as Infiniti's SAE of 490.
#108
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#109
MBWorld Fanatic!
#110
Super Member
its funny this is the only thing you chose to respond to cause you couldn't respond to anything else as you know my points are valid. or do i have to ask again and this time specifically directed at you? allow me to do so....
Jim G do you think that its abnormal for a m156 with tune, tubes and filters to put down 470whp on a dyno jet?
if not which we all can agree is not abnormal, what do you have to say about my after results when Jerry sent back the last tune?
yeah cause REAL ST has anything to do with EC? hahhahah
Jim G do you think that its abnormal for a m156 with tune, tubes and filters to put down 470whp on a dyno jet?
if not which we all can agree is not abnormal, what do you have to say about my after results when Jerry sent back the last tune?
yeah cause REAL ST has anything to do with EC? hahhahah
Others have already expressed their scepticism about the other poster's power claims, and by obvious extension yours. I understand their scepticism. When everyone has been working for a decade to hit a magic threshold without success, and then 1 or 2 people claim, with great fanfare, to have hit it on "their" car with virtually no work in comparison, and with no explanation for what the big breakthrough is, you should be able to understand why people are suspicious that something is amiss in your results.
There is no fabulous new intake manifold, or exhaust, or other believable new technology or approach being provided. And, your post, and the OP's post, came across as boastful without merit, and also as "shilling" for the tuner you used who is implying, but not identifying, a breakthrough.
It's like a politician saying "Everything will be different and better now", but not providing any shred of proof of WHY everything is suddenly different and better now, but insisting he is the one to elect or re-elect to office.
Where's "the beef"in this tantalyzing hamburger ad?
Jim G
#111
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I was trying to defend you, Infinity, not attack you, and not because I believe you or don't believe your other claims (I don't know you and your credibility yet), but rather because this statement you made about DA correction is indeed true. That's all.
Others have already expressed their scepticism about the other poster's power claims, and by obvious extension yours. I understand their scepticism. When everyone has been working for a decade to hit a magic threshold without success, and then 1 or 2 people claim, with great fanfare, to have hit it on "their" car with virtually no work in comparison, and with no explanation for what the big breakthrough is, you should be able to understand why people are suspicious that something is amiss in your results.
There is no fabulous new intake manifold, or exhaust, or other believable new technology or approach being provided. And, your post, and the OP's post, came across as boastful without merit, and also as "shilling" for the tuner you used who is implying, but not identifying, a breakthrough.
It's like a politician saying "Everything will be different and better now", but not providing any shred of proof of WHY everything is suddenly different and better now, but insisting he is the one to elect or re-elect to office.
Where's "the beef"in this tantalyzing hamburger ad?
Jim G
Others have already expressed their scepticism about the other poster's power claims, and by obvious extension yours. I understand their scepticism. When everyone has been working for a decade to hit a magic threshold without success, and then 1 or 2 people claim, with great fanfare, to have hit it on "their" car with virtually no work in comparison, and with no explanation for what the big breakthrough is, you should be able to understand why people are suspicious that something is amiss in your results.
There is no fabulous new intake manifold, or exhaust, or other believable new technology or approach being provided. And, your post, and the OP's post, came across as boastful without merit, and also as "shilling" for the tuner you used who is implying, but not identifying, a breakthrough.
It's like a politician saying "Everything will be different and better now", but not providing any shred of proof of WHY everything is suddenly different and better now, but insisting he is the one to elect or re-elect to office.
Where's "the beef"in this tantalyzing hamburger ad?
Jim G
#112
MBWorld Fanatic!
#113
MBWorld Fanatic!
Don't worry boys, Daddy is on his way home from vacation soon.
Also -- EC is a franchise and all their stores do not necessarily communicate with each other all the time or share the same tunes.
From what I have seen... The tunes coming out of Canada are more aggressive than stateside tunes. Perhaps why old wise one Purple drove to Canada for his...
For all the doubters, I would tread lightly. I love you guys, and understand where the quick doubts come from, but be cautiously optimistic instead of strongly against what you see.
Waiting for other dyno results.
Ou, Infiniti, you're a dbag.
From what I have seen... The tunes coming out of Canada are more aggressive than stateside tunes. Perhaps why old wise one Purple drove to Canada for his...
For all the doubters, I would tread lightly. I love you guys, and understand where the quick doubts come from, but be cautiously optimistic instead of strongly against what you see.
Waiting for other dyno results.
Ou, Infiniti, you're a dbag.
#114
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,063
Received 2,845 Likes
on
1,678 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Whatever Kiva, go take your land yacht and uh make like a tree and uh go away
#115
MBWorld Fanatic!
#116
Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
2019 e63S, 2017 Audi R8 Twin Turbo
I feel like I'm missing something...a DynoJet was used to dyno this number I've seen c63's make 470-480 on mustang dyno's which read lower so those same cars will make around 500 on a DynoJet.
We also know that Eurocharged is not known for making aggressive tunes compared to some of the other tuners.
So given all of this information I don't understand what this is about. If I'm missing something please feel free to correct me.
We also know that Eurocharged is not known for making aggressive tunes compared to some of the other tuners.
So given all of this information I don't understand what this is about. If I'm missing something please feel free to correct me.
The following users liked this post:
Mag1c Carp3t (05-23-2017)
#118
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 935
Received 74 Likes
on
58 Posts
a unicorn tuned p30 e63
Don't worry boys, Daddy is on his way home from vacation soon.
Also -- EC is a franchise and all their stores do not necessarily communicate with each other all the time or share the same tunes.
From what I have seen... The tunes coming out of Canada are more aggressive than stateside tunes. Perhaps why old wise one Purple drove to Canada for his...
For all the doubters, I would tread lightly. I love you guys, and understand where the quick doubts come from, but be cautiously optimistic instead of strongly against what you see.
Waiting for other dyno results.
Ou, Infiniti, you're a dbag.
Also -- EC is a franchise and all their stores do not necessarily communicate with each other all the time or share the same tunes.
From what I have seen... The tunes coming out of Canada are more aggressive than stateside tunes. Perhaps why old wise one Purple drove to Canada for his...
For all the doubters, I would tread lightly. I love you guys, and understand where the quick doubts come from, but be cautiously optimistic instead of strongly against what you see.
Waiting for other dyno results.
Ou, Infiniti, you're a dbag.
I'll call you this week Dave. We'll get to the bottom of this. Would love to have another safe 30whp on top of my EC V5 tune. And people here know by now that I don't hold back my opinions, good or bad....
You said something interesting above about (paraphrasing) seeing a few 500whp cars on E85. Are you saying that's what's happening here, because that detail has been left out and would obviously change everything
And for Infinity, I don't care about you or your dyno-queen car. If you're going to post trap speeds, that's when I'll be interested. Otherwise... yawn.
You said something interesting above about (paraphrasing) seeing a few 500whp cars on E85. Are you saying that's what's happening here, because that detail has been left out and would obviously change everything
And for Infinity, I don't care about you or your dyno-queen car. If you're going to post trap speeds, that's when I'll be interested. Otherwise... yawn.
Side note - I am a little curious about how Infinity's situation/ car is getting ignored. Real St. is a real place and in now way affiliated with EC. His results were displayed in SAE...
Nobody cares about this? To be hung up on whatever it did before also doesn't make much sense - It's about the same as comparing an 2008 C63 to a 507 baseline... it doesn't matter much what they started with - one they are FBO, it's been widely accepted that they ALL will make about the same 470-480whp.
Now we have these two outliers, and I know of a couple more overseas that have seen similar gains (25-30whp) over what was understood as "just what they make".
Just wait and see
Thanks
Dave
Nobody cares about this? To be hung up on whatever it did before also doesn't make much sense - It's about the same as comparing an 2008 C63 to a 507 baseline... it doesn't matter much what they started with - one they are FBO, it's been widely accepted that they ALL will make about the same 470-480whp.
Now we have these two outliers, and I know of a couple more overseas that have seen similar gains (25-30whp) over what was understood as "just what they make".
Just wait and see
Thanks
Dave
500whp or not, i am more than impressed and satisfied with the results from the remote tune.
#119
Member
Well, I'll be contacting EC to get my V5 shelf tune replaced with a custom V6 dyno tune here in good ol' Denver for the 507. I feel like I'm missing some power...
#120
Hi guys.
Don´t forget that when we compare WHP and HP, the loss not only changes for each different car, but it also changes for each RPM in the SAME car.
So, when you say it´s 500 WHP to 400HP, this 20% loss (sounds a lot) is valid for the RPM only, probably close to 6500.
In lower RPM, that you will use most of time, it will be lower, much lower... below 15% ... try to figure the 2 graphs, the curves are way too different.
And yes, Stock C63 507 has exactly the same power output (same mapping, same everything) found in STOCK C63 with P30 or P31 (despite of MB saying it´s "487 HP"). Actually they all have the same 507 HP. Same curves and max on any dynos, same times on any track.
I´m new here and own a C63 P31 2012 Sedan. Love this forum! Thank you for running and evolving it!
Don´t forget that when we compare WHP and HP, the loss not only changes for each different car, but it also changes for each RPM in the SAME car.
So, when you say it´s 500 WHP to 400HP, this 20% loss (sounds a lot) is valid for the RPM only, probably close to 6500.
In lower RPM, that you will use most of time, it will be lower, much lower... below 15% ... try to figure the 2 graphs, the curves are way too different.
And yes, Stock C63 507 has exactly the same power output (same mapping, same everything) found in STOCK C63 with P30 or P31 (despite of MB saying it´s "487 HP"). Actually they all have the same 507 HP. Same curves and max on any dynos, same times on any track.
I´m new here and own a C63 P31 2012 Sedan. Love this forum! Thank you for running and evolving it!
The following users liked this post:
djr48312 (02-15-2021)
#121
SPONSOR
Tiff speaking, be nice.
This is a customer we tuned up in Minneapolis last month. It was done on a DynoJet 424x at MA Performance. We have absolutely NO affiliation with them.
I asked him what modifications are on his car:
"P31 with MBH catless LTH, midpipe, and x-pipe, Revosport CF intake, ROW airboxes, AFE filters, Akrapovic exhaust, WaveTrac LSD."
Three different runs on the same day.
This is a customer we tuned up in Minneapolis last month. It was done on a DynoJet 424x at MA Performance. We have absolutely NO affiliation with them.
I asked him what modifications are on his car:
"P31 with MBH catless LTH, midpipe, and x-pipe, Revosport CF intake, ROW airboxes, AFE filters, Akrapovic exhaust, WaveTrac LSD."
Three different runs on the same day.
#122
Senior Member
I was there for this Jerry didn't touch the tune he said that he would lose power if he did any revisions.
Tiff speaking, be nice.
This is a customer we tuned up in Minneapolis last month. It was done on a DynoJet 424x at MA Performance. We have absolutely NO affiliation with them.
I asked him what modifications are on his car:
"P31 with MBH catless LTH, midpipe, and x-pipe, Revosport CF intake, ROW airboxes, AFE filters, Akrapovic exhaust, WaveTrac LSD."
Three different runs on the same day.
This is a customer we tuned up in Minneapolis last month. It was done on a DynoJet 424x at MA Performance. We have absolutely NO affiliation with them.
I asked him what modifications are on his car:
"P31 with MBH catless LTH, midpipe, and x-pipe, Revosport CF intake, ROW airboxes, AFE filters, Akrapovic exhaust, WaveTrac LSD."
Three different runs on the same day.
#123
MBWorld Fanatic!
#124
MBWorld Fanatic!
Boys I was contacted by a "Friend" just a heads up theres some new "stuff" in the works. As you can see i was asked to keep the details confidential. However, I will post back my results in a weeks time.
The following users liked this post:
shaun.barnard (09-16-2024)