who actually wants a w206 C63? - Page 5

Jul 27, 2023 | 10:07 PM

#101

eatmydust

Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2010

Posts: 365

Likes: 46

2020 C43, 2008 E350

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosAMGBR

The new C 63 S is such a joke and such an awful value proposition, that you are either crazy or stupid to buy it. It keeps none of the factors that make an AMG an AMG, its crazy complex, its crazy expensive and fugly. A ****ty overstressed 4 cylinder engine, with a crazy complex and heavy hybrid system that adds so much weight the car has the weight of an AMG GT 63 S.

Its awful, it represents everything wrong with the current Mercedes line up and its ****ty products. The brand has lost its way. I am proud to say I own a W 204 C 63 AMG. I would never be proud of owning this awful 4 cylinder jokes.

I hope it flops miserably so Mercedes learns that we don't want stupid screens, stupid gimmicks, the stupid TikTok integration (WTF), we want V8 cars with awesome build quality, with the usual Mercedes smell, and refinement. Not some overpriced joke. To make matters worse, Mercedes even screwed up their build quality, the W206 feels 2 cuts below the W205/W204 in build quality. Such a shame.

Why are you going and posting this same thing everywhere? Let it go man jesus.

Jul 28, 2023 | 04:37 PM

#102

cls5504matic

Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2019

Posts: 488

Likes: 122

C63 Vert

Watch collecting taught me that more expensive things aren't always better and that newer isn't always better.

Jul 28, 2023 | 04:49 PM

#103

Dima

Super Member

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 759

Likes: 258

From: Boston

AMG

Quote:

Originally Posted by cls5504matic

Watch collecting taught me that more expensive things aren't always better and that newer isn't always better.

it's a bit different though, cheap quartz watch might be more accurate than Patek, but you buy craftsmanship, history, rarity and value retention.

Jul 28, 2023 | 04:57 PM

#104

cls5504matic

Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2019

Posts: 488

Likes: 122

C63 Vert

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dima

it's a bit different though, cheap quartz watch might be more accurate than Patek, but you buy craftsmanship, history, rarity and value retention.

and a rolex submariner gmt or daytona will beat out almost any patek and audemars while keeping much better time under real world hard use.

i bought an ap royal oak at 17 and learned this.

Jul 28, 2023 | 05:08 PM

#105

Dima

Super Member

Joined: Jan 2005

Posts: 759

Likes: 258

From: Boston

AMG

Quote:

Originally Posted by cls5504matic

and a rolex submariner gmt or daytona will beat out almost any patek and audemars while keeping much better time under real world hard use.

i bought an ap royal oak at 17 and learned this.

You know how AMG technician builds an engine? Rolex uses machines for most of its watch assembly, AP and Patek use much less. Rolex is more robust, AP is more jewelry-like and Patek has best complications.
Also Rolex produces many many more watches.
Ok enough about watches otherwise they'll shut the thread down.

Reply Subscribe

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)