Anybody consider change to GT500
I’ve driven the most recent Mustang GT (rental) and the 5.0l is mean - probably puts up a good fight against a stock C63. But interior wise, exterior, infotainment/UI, etc. still makes it feel like a rental car 😕
The AMG feels a lot more special and you can easily add gobs of power if you want to go down that route. The biggest advantage I’ll say is the DCT vs our MCT 7 and 9 speeds - can’t hold a candle to that Tremec dual clutch, it’s holding power and response.
I’ve driven the most recent Mustang GT (rental) and the 5.0l is mean - probably puts up a good fight against a stock C63. But interior wise, exterior, infotainment/UI, etc. still makes it feel like a rental car 😕
The AMG feels a lot more special and you can easily add gobs of power if you want to go down that route. The biggest advantage I’ll say is the DCT vs our MCT 7 and 9 speeds - can’t hold a candle to that Tremec dual clutch, it’s holding power and response.
I’ve driven the most recent Mustang GT (rental) and the 5.0l is mean - probably puts up a good fight against a stock C63. But interior wise, exterior, infotainment/UI, etc. still makes it feel like a rental car 😕
The AMG feels a lot more special and you can easily add gobs of power if you want to go down that route. The biggest advantage I’ll say is the DCT vs our MCT 7 and 9 speeds - can’t hold a candle to that Tremec dual clutch, it’s holding power and response.
Trending Topics




Last edited by superswiss; Jun 18, 2020 at 01:32 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I have a PFL, but I’ve also driven the new 9-speed quite extensively in the E63S - both on road and at the limits on the track. There is slightly better paddle response (we’re talking in the hundredths, not tenths of second), but the difference is negligible - and this was going back and forth between my 7 speed car and the E63S to test.
Also, I don’t know when the last time you drove a PFL 7 speed, but I’ve received at least 3-4 drivetrain updates (including updated transmission software) and the paddle shifting is nearly instantaneous. I drove 99% of the time in manual, so if lag was a prominent issue on the 7-speeds I would be on here *****ing out AMG.
I’m not saying the 9-speed isn’t an improvement (certainly is), but it isn’t raising the bar in terms of new technology against the competition. Even the tried and true ZF 8 speed with a torque converter that’s in dozens of cars has been fine tuned by BMW for the next M cars - and it’s a MUCH better transmission than even the 9-speed. As much as I hate to admit that a transmission with a conventional torque converter is better than AMG’s latest and greatest, it’s simply true - they’ve nailed the tuning and response by programming it very well.
And not dig into the 9-speed, but I passionately hate how many gears it has. Why you need 3rd gear to hit 60 mph in a 4 liter twin turbo V8 is beyond me... I’m not a fan of that super close gear ratio in there, or the excessive amount of fuel saving gears. I’m sure the short 1-3 gears shave a tenth or so off the 60 mph time, but it doesn’t fit the character of the engine - that’s what I’d expect from a 2.0T 4 cylinder.
Last edited by AlexZTuned; Jun 18, 2020 at 11:08 AM.




I have a PFL, but I’ve also driven the new 9-speed quite extensively in the E63S - both on road and at the limits on the track. There is slightly better paddle response (we’re talking in the hundredths, not tenths of second), but the difference is negligible - and this was going back and forth between my 7 speed car and the E63S to test.
Also, I don’t know when the last time you drove a PFL 7 speed, but I’ve received at least 3-4 drivetrain updates (including updated transmission software) and the paddle shifting is nearly instantaneous. I drove 99% of the time in manual, so if lag was a prominent issue on the 7-speeds I would be on here *****ing out AMG.
I’m not saying the 9-speed isn’t an improvement (certainly is), but it isn’t raising the bar in terms of new technology against the competition. Even the tried and true ZF 8 speed with a torque converter that’s in dozens of cars has been fine tuned by BMW for the next M cars - and it’s a MUCH better transmission than even the 9-speed. As much as I hate to admit that a transmission with a conventional torque converter is better than AMG’s latest and greatest, it’s simply true - they’ve nailed the tuning and response by programming it very well.
And not dig into the 9-speed, but I passionately hate how many gears it has. Why you need 3rd gear to hit 60 mph in a 4 liter twin turbo V8 is beyond me... I’m not a fan of that super close gear ratio in there, or the excessive amount of fuel saving gears. I’m sure the short 1-3 gears shave a tenth or so off the 60 mph time, but it doesn’t fit the character of the engine - that’s what I’d expect from a 2.0T 4 cylinder.
If you don't like the gearing, then you don't like it, but keep in mind the different models have different final ratios, so the gear ratios are not the same in every model. Even the C63 sedan has different ratios from the coupe. I have no issues with it. I like the close ratio gearing and the fact that 1-6 are short gears optimized for acceleration, and 7-9 are cruising/highway gears. I'm personally not a fan of the ZF8. Yes, BMW has one of the better implementations and I do wanna drive the next M3/4, but so far it hasn't lived up to my expectations in any performance model.
I'm still a huge fan of DCTs and sad to see them go, but they do work better on the track than on public roads as I said above. I definitely initially hesitated with the MCT, but I have come around based on the performance of the MCT 9 in the FL C63. This is anecdotal, but I've just recently watched a review from some YouTuber who owns a C8 Corvette and drove a 2019 C63. He was raving about the transmission in comparison to the DCT in the Corvette. He particularly commented on the responsiveness. As far as I know the C8 also uses the Tremec. Just one guy, but so far you are the only one I came across who speaks more negatively about the MCT 9 in the C63 w/o specifically having driven it in that model.
Last edited by superswiss; Jun 18, 2020 at 01:06 PM.
I have a PFL, but I’ve also driven the new 9-speed quite extensively in the E63S - both on road and at the limits on the track. There is slightly better paddle response (we’re talking in the hundredths, not tenths of second), but the difference is negligible - and this was going back and forth between my 7 speed car and the E63S to test.
Also, I don’t know when the last time you drove a PFL 7 speed, but I’ve received at least 3-4 drivetrain updates (including updated transmission software) and the paddle shifting is nearly instantaneous. I drove 99% of the time in manual, so if lag was a prominent issue on the 7-speeds I would be on here *****ing out AMG.
I’m not saying the 9-speed isn’t an improvement (certainly is), but it isn’t raising the bar in terms of new technology against the competition. Even the tried and true ZF 8 speed with a torque converter that’s in dozens of cars has been fine tuned by BMW for the next M cars - and it’s a MUCH better transmission than even the 9-speed. As much as I hate to admit that a transmission with a conventional torque converter is better than AMG’s latest and greatest, it’s simply true - they’ve nailed the tuning and response by programming it very well.
And not dig into the 9-speed, but I passionately hate how many gears it has. Why you need 3rd gear to hit 60 mph in a 4 liter twin turbo V8 is beyond me... I’m not a fan of that super close gear ratio in there, or the excessive amount of fuel saving gears. I’m sure the short 1-3 gears shave a tenth or so off the 60 mph time, but it doesn’t fit the character of the engine - that’s what I’d expect from a 2.0T 4 cylinder.
There are much better platforms to go really fast in. For the money, I would rather have a pre-owned 991.1 Turbo S, but that’s just me. Mustangs are fun cars and I always have fun whenever I drive them, but I’m just not the kinda guy to own one.





