








Would you buy a 4 cylinder C63?

We all know it won't sound as good as any V8 model. It likely wont sound good, at all.
We know this new version is going to be even more heavy then the current model.
We know none of us would want to own an even more complicated car outside of a warranty.
We know it will still be out ran by a performance version of a Tesla, at least in 0-60mph times.
However, it might be faster than the current C63S to 60mph.
A lot of the added weight will be down low in the chassis.
It will likely have an immense amount of torque.
It will be more easy on gasoline consumption.
It will pollute less.
Now here is the question. Given the future prospect of an incoming inline 4 plus electric powered C63 that will cost the same, if not more than the previous model.
Would you rather:
A. Keep your existing V8 AMG powered car as long as possible.
B. Go full electric instead of going to a 4 cylinder/electric car by moving to a Taycan or Tesla for the next car.
C. Buy the new inline-4 cylinder C63 AMG
Last edited by Rahulio1975280C; Feb 4, 2021 at 02:04 AM.
Would never buy a full electric car regardless of how much faster they are. Been in a friends Tesla and yeah it's quick but at the end of the day friends still wants to ride in my car.
Interestingly, as cars offer better performance and more tech they seem to become less fun. Too much tech and green?
Can we get a 4th option of possibly in the future?
Last edited by Bigair96; Feb 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM.




Trending Topics
For a daily driver, I don't mind a 4-cylinder, I actually have a 2019 AWD KIA Sportage, nothing exciting but it gets the job done (it is also surprisingly good as a soft off-roader) However, for my weekend car I want something exciting!!! No way I'll be giving up my V8 C63S Coupe. After a decade or so, when it gets too expensive to maintain my C63S, I might go with a GT.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
AMG is shifting from the traditional German muscle car to F1 hybrid tech by downsizing engines and adding electric-motors for power - I blame their success in F1 racing for this monumental shift in AMG's direction.
In reality I'd have both in a few years: V8 for driving, and electric for utility/transportation.
Last edited by phoenixblue; Feb 4, 2021 at 06:03 PM.
So what's the point of all this? Unless AMG extracts MEGA performance out of battery electric power, then they shouldn't bother adding complicity, weight, and technology just for the sake of it. Now that Tesla Plaid+ is going to be a cognitive shock in acceleration, but it still weighs a boat and the handling is what it is. This is why AMG, with all the downsizing and F1 inspired-tech, is going down the wrong path by making the W206 even heavier with 4 less cylinders to carry. It should have been a light weight, high-revving, sub-3600lb car that can handle. AMG downsized from the 6.2L to the 4.0L for the sake of emissions and MPG, if they're downsizing to a 2.0L 4cylinder then it should be light and nimble!
I don't think I can name a single performance car in this segment that has a 4 cylinder at this price tag - there's no question that we will see W206 C63e pushing well beyond the 100k mark when the musty-have options get ticked, and there is a lot of strong competition out there in that price range - and much better options in my opinion.




So what's the point of all this? Unless AMG extracts MEGA performance out of battery electric power, then they shouldn't bother adding complicity, weight, and technology just for the sake of it. Now that Tesla Plaid+ is going to be a cognitive shock in acceleration, but it still weighs a boat and the handling is what it is. This is why AMG, with all the downsizing and F1 inspired-tech, is going down the wrong path by making the W206 even heavier with 4 less cylinders to carry. It should have been a light weight, high-revving, sub-3600lb car that can handle. AMG downsized from the 6.2L to the 4.0L for the sake of emissions and MPG, if they're downsizing to a 2.0L 4cylinder then it should be light and nimble!
I don't think I can name a single performance car in this segment that has a 4 cylinder at this price tag - there's no question that we will see W206 C63e pushing well beyond the 100k mark when the musty-have options get ticked, and there is a lot of strong competition out there in that price range - and much better options in my opinion.
Sorry to digress. I think Mercedes will make the new C63s enticing enough to appeal to the masses, not the true enthuciasts conversing on these forums. Besides, the Green movement is forcing the hand on all of the car manufactures.
So what's the point of all this? Unless AMG extracts MEGA performance out of battery electric power, then they shouldn't bother adding complicity, weight, and technology just for the sake of it. Now that Tesla Plaid+ is going to be a cognitive shock in acceleration, but it still weighs a boat and the handling is what it is. This is why AMG, with all the downsizing and F1 inspired-tech, is going down the wrong path by making the W206 even heavier with 4 less cylinders to carry. It should have been a light weight, high-revving, sub-3600lb car that can handle. AMG downsized from the 6.2L to the 4.0L for the sake of emissions and MPG, if they're downsizing to a 2.0L 4cylinder then it should be light and nimble!
I don't think I can name a single performance car in this segment that has a 4 cylinder at this price tag - there's no question that we will see W206 C63e pushing well beyond the 100k mark when the musty-have options get ticked, and there is a lot of strong competition out there in that price range - and much better options in my opinion.
That being said though, if you took that same 5.4L V8 from the Lightning, tuned it a bit, and showed it into a performance-oriented car, the two vehicle would be nothing alike. Funny how Ford did just that with the Ford GT. Anyone that has driven a Ford GT would never, ever in their wildest dreams try to compare it to a Lightning. Yet people nowadays put that same "Lightning"-type stigma onto the simple idea of an all-electric powerplant by rolling out the Tesla comparisons.




That being said though, if you took that same 5.4L V8 from the Lightning, tuned it a bit, and showed it into a performance-oriented car, the two vehicle would be nothing alike. Funny how Ford did just that with the Ford GT. Anyone that has driven a Ford GT would never, ever in their wildest dreams try to compare it to a Lightning. Yet people nowadays put that same "Lightning"-type stigma onto the simple idea of an all-electric powerplant by rolling out the Tesla comparisons.
Last edited by superswiss; Feb 5, 2021 at 01:00 PM.
Driven a euro-spec A45 and it was astonishing. Astonishing little thing! Ok, so it doesnt sound good and lacks some of the appeal of the V8, but it was far from a bad car! Would I swap the C63S for it? Not so sure at the moment. It is still an event each and every time I get in it and while I havent driven it much in the last 8-10 months, I am really looking forward to in the near(ish) future. I am not sure I would get the same experience with a 4 cylinder version. That said, the A45 is an amazing way to cover ground very quickly and with a lot of the 'DNA' of AMG built into it, it does make an impressive package. I would certainly take a look at what the next AMG model is though. I guess its going to be some sort of 2.0 turbo with hybrid support, which could be interesting. But at the moment, with the massive drop in mileage from 2020, I will keep mine a little longer than I was planning.
The only thing that will make me change in the short term is a potential move from California to a less favorable climate. RWD, winter snow and the need to get to and from an airport (when travel resumes) might necessitate a 4WD car. But of course, I could get a cheap beater for that, so who knows. I am tempted to keep the C63 for as long as I can though.




Driven a euro-spec A45 and it was astonishing. Astonishing little thing! Ok, so it doesnt sound good and lacks some of the appeal of the V8, but it was far from a bad car! Would I swap the C63S for it? Not so sure at the moment. It is still an event each and every time I get in it and while I havent driven it much in the last 8-10 months, I am really looking forward to in the near(ish) future. I am not sure I would get the same experience with a 4 cylinder version. That said, the A45 is an amazing way to cover ground very quickly and with a lot of the 'DNA' of AMG built into it, it does make an impressive package. I would certainly take a look at what the next AMG model is though. I guess its going to be some sort of 2.0 turbo with hybrid support, which could be interesting. But at the moment, with the massive drop in mileage from 2020, I will keep mine a little longer than I was planning.
The only thing that will make me change in the short term is a potential move from California to a less favorable climate. RWD, winter snow and the need to get to and from an airport (when travel resumes) might necessitate a 4WD car. But of course, I could get a cheap beater for that, so who knows. I am tempted to keep the C63 for as long as I can though.
That being said though, if you took that same 5.4L V8 from the Lightning, tuned it a bit, and showed it into a performance-oriented car, the two vehicle would be nothing alike. Funny how Ford did just that with the Ford GT. Anyone that has driven a Ford GT would never, ever in their wildest dreams try to compare it to a Lightning. Yet people nowadays put that same "Lightning"-type stigma onto the simple idea of an all-electric powerplant by rolling out the Tesla comparisons.
Wife did want to terminate, but for me its not a hard decision. Car or life of a baby, bye bye car!
Up for sale very soon, uk.
I was in the market for a muscle car and was sold on the growly character and torque of the C63, so that's why I bought into AMG. But it now looks like it will be the last AMG I buy, as they start producing golf carts. I may buy an S63 when I'm 70, but I'll go back to Porsche for fun cars. Looks like Mercedes is going back to being an old man's car.
I only want an AMG for the engine. If I want technology, Mercedes would likely be my very last pick. My GPS broke within weeks, and my last Mercedes was an electrical nightmare.
Last edited by Kurzweil; Feb 6, 2021 at 08:06 PM.
That said, I'm not that keen anymore on the c205 v8 sound. With sport exhaust on it sounds too artificial and I'm always thinking about how good my old 6.3 was
I had the old shape m4 for 2 months - the fake speaker sound was horrible so I guess that rules out the new one also
That's leading me to think that all modern cars sound crap now anyway, so why not just go full electric and have no sound then enjoy the instant acceleration. The only thing stopping me is I like the playfulness of RWD cars and the two EVs I drove (m3p and taycan) were so damn composed and I'm not sure if that's what I'm after





