CL55 AMG, CL65 AMG, CL63 AMG (C215, C216) 2000 - 2014 (Two Generations)

Impact on performance due to wheel weight/size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-23-2008, 05:35 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
leetski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bicycle
Impact on performance due to wheel weight/size?

Just a thought. If I were to replace my custom wheels which weight ~70lbs (with tires) with a lighter set (~50lbs, same diameter) would there be a significant increase in performance, in terms of acceleration? What about handling? I am guessing yes, but is it possible to quantify these gains mathematically?

Also, how heavy is the stock rear '03 CL55 wheel+tire?

Thanks guys.
Old 06-23-2008, 06:43 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Vadim @ FD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S600TT, R350
Yes, there will be less losses going through the wheels and you will see more power at the wheels on acceleration type (i.e. Dynojet) dyno.

I have dynoed a lot of cars when switching wheels. Figure about 15-20 RWHP.
Old 06-23-2008, 10:12 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DFW01E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,566
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
'14 ML BT
Originally Posted by leetski
... is it possible to quantify these gains mathematically?
...
That's a really good question. There must be an equation.
(Not that I could do it, but Excel can help!)
Old 06-24-2008, 11:00 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
leetski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bicycle
Originally Posted by DFW01E55
That's a really good question. There must be an equation.
(Not that I could do it, but Excel can help!)
Here is what I know, horsepower is a measure of energy per second, it can be computed at any time (rev/rpm) if you know the time history of the torque and the velocity of the wheel. hp = torque x velocity.
More importantly, if we know the time history of the torque at the wheel, then we can compute the acceleration as follows from Newtons laws, Net_Torque = Inerita_of_Wheel?*Angular_Acceleration.
Then, what we really care about is translational acceleration which is just: Trans_acceleration=Radius*Angular_acceleration.
Below is a graph that I generated using some dyno numbers I dug up online for a stock '03 CL55. It compares Trans_acceleration of a 70lbs wheel+tire to a 50lbs wheel+tire.



I know for a fact that these numbers mean nothing as far as Acceleration comptuation is concerned. The reason being is that I don't know if the torque numbers are given for just one wheel or the entire rear setup (2 wheels / axles). In my calculations I only used inertia of one wheel, which I doubt is correct but gives you a back of the napkin type calculation.
Then certainly, in real life conditions, the net torque is not just what the dyno graph reads, we also have to account for friction between tire and contact surface if nothing else..?

Maybe a better way to calculate acceleration would be to use torque readings along with horsepower readings. Dividing hp by torque would give us velocity and then we could differentiate to obtain acceleration? Would be more realistic and we wouldnt have to worry about detailed modeling since we have empirical data.
Old 06-24-2008, 11:36 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DFW01E55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,566
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
'14 ML BT
Originally Posted by leetski
Here is what I know, horsepower is a measure of energy per second, it can be computed at any time (rev/rpm) if you know the time history of the torque and the velocity of the wheel. hp = torque x velocity.
More importantly, if we know the time history of the torque at the wheel, then we can compute the acceleration as follows from Newtons laws, Net_Torque = Inerita_of_Wheel?*Angular_Acceleration.
Then, what we really care about is translational acceleration which is just: Trans_acceleration=Radius*Angular_acceleration.

...

I know for a fact that these numbers mean nothing as far as Acceleration comptuation is concerned. The reason being is that I don't know if the torque numbers are given for just one wheel or the entire rear setup (2 wheels / axles). In my calculations I only used inertia of one wheel, which I doubt is correct but gives you a back of the napkin type calculation.
Then certainly, in real life conditions, the net torque is not just what the dyno graph reads, we also have to account for friction between tire and contact surface if nothing else..?

Maybe a better way to calculate acceleration would be to use torque readings along with horsepower readings. Dividing hp by torque would give us velocity and then we could differentiate to obtain acceleration? Would be more realistic and we wouldnt have to worry about detailed modeling since we have empirical data.
Wow!
So how 'bout them Celtics?
Old 06-25-2008, 01:44 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
IngenereAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
SL55AMG, Ferrari 348, Ferrari Testarossa, Ferrari F40, Ferrari Mondial t, Ducati 916, Indycar
Originally Posted by leetski
Just a thought. If I were to replace my custom wheels which weight ~70lbs (with tires) with a lighter set (~50lbs, same diameter) would there be a significant increase in performance, in terms of acceleration? What about handling? I am guessing yes, but is it possible to quantify these gains mathematically?

Also, how heavy is the stock rear '03 CL55 wheel+tire?

Thanks guys.
Aside from the obvious fact that you are making the car 80 pounds lighter, you are taking the weight fro a very important area...... unsprung weight.

Your car will accelerate better, but you will really notice how much more crisply the car turns in.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Impact on performance due to wheel weight/size?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 PM.