CL55 AMG, CL65 AMG, CL63 AMG (C215, C216) 2000 - 2014 (Two Generations)

CL55 vs CL600: Which is the better overall performance car (speed and handling)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-06-2008, 03:36 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by Patentmat
The subject of the thread says speed and handling. I'm only speaking to the speed for now.


Yes it does but he dumped his E55 over handling. The CLs aren't going to be any faster unless he goes nuts and gets a 65. The difference in straight line speed is almost negligble between the supercharged 55/NA 63 cars, M5/6, and E92 M3s. So from my perspective it comes down to which handles best, which would be either an M3 or a C63 since he doesn't like the M5/6 SMG.
Old 08-06-2008, 04:18 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Patentmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Davis
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 CL55
Yes it does but he dumped his E55 over handling. The CLs aren't going to be any faster unless he goes nuts and gets a 65. The difference in straight line speed is almost negligble between the supercharged 55/NA 63 cars, M5/6, and E92 M3s. So from my perspective it comes down to which handles best, which would be either an M3 or a C63 since he doesn't like the M5/6 SMG.
That's a really good point. Honestly, if I were doing it now and wanted to stick with a Mercedes that handled I would go with the C63. Resell value should be good for the first few years and by then there will be even more high output mercs to choose from.
Old 08-06-2008, 04:39 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Patentmat:

I just saw your pic....wow gorgeous ride!!! I love that designo cashmere! You should post some more pics of the rims up close...please.

Tom
Old 08-06-2008, 08:18 PM
  #29  
Member
Thread Starter
 
TonyJ89117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
997C2S
Handling

Handling is definitely the most important aspect of a car for me, with kick butt power second.

I am hoping my next Benz will handle closer to my M6 versus the E55. The E55 was actually a big disappointment for me.

Is the handling of the CL65 really that bad? I can imagine 4600# being a handful in the corners, but I figured the AMG techs found a way to make it handle.

I have considered the C63, but prefer the look of the coupes. Is the C63 that good?
Old 08-06-2008, 08:47 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BlownV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my garage
Posts: 8,539
Received 1,064 Likes on 853 Posts
E55, GLS450, GL63, GLE350
Originally Posted by chiphomme
I think he should opt for an M3 Sedan with DCT or a C63 (both of which would beat up on any CL, even in a straight line, except the 65).
Yeah, OK. I can guarantee it would not beat a Renntech CL600 in a straight line. From what I've seen, the Renntech 600's are quicker than the stock 65's.
Old 08-06-2008, 10:42 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
chiphomme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fargo, North Dakota
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Cayenne Turbo
Originally Posted by BlownV8
Yeah, OK. I can guarantee it would not beat a Renntech CL600 in a straight line. From what I've seen, the Renntech 600's are quicker than the stock 65's.

I was talking stock vehicles.
Old 08-06-2008, 11:09 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Patentmat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Davis
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 CL55
Thanks Tom. The colors seem to be pretty rare. I have never seen another CL with my exterior color, nor those two tone seats. But I like them both. The only question is . . . how to use this rarity when I finally decide to sell my ride?

As far as the C63 goes, yes it really is a mad merc from what I have seen, and probably a hell of a lot of fun to drive. Car and Driver actually got the 0-60 down to 3.9 on this thing with a 12.3 quarter mile time. Again though, it will not handle like a BMW

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...s_benz_c63_amg
Old 08-07-2008, 01:04 AM
  #33  
WSH
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
WSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2010 CL65
Fairly silly to compare latest-tech perf cars to old AMG CLs, which are based upon tech from nearly 10 yrs ago....about as absurd as comparing cell phones from '03 or '05 to today's best smartphones....the pace of advances, esp in past 2-4 yrs, in chassis hardware/software (&networking w/various drivetrain computers) in all AMG/F/P is rather remarkable....

Really should drive an '09 CL63 030/65 in mtn twisties to judge for self....after doing back-to-backs in twisties, I passed on getting the rather dynamically superb SL63 030 to get '09 CL65 instead....(hate the brake pedal feel of SL vs CL; much prefer the grip/bolsters of the AMG CL sport seats over the elderly-tech seats of AMG SL)....

Last-gen (?'01-'06) AMG CL was clearly a car w/a high-powered motor, but w/underwhelming, non-confidence-inspiring luxury car-oriented steering/chassis/brakes....
Old 08-07-2008, 10:50 AM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by WSH
Fairly silly to compare latest-tech perf cars to old AMG CLs, which are based upon tech from nearly 10 yrs ago....about as absurd as comparing cell phones from '03 or '05 to today's best smartphones....the pace of advances, esp in past 2-4 yrs, in chassis hardware/software (&networking w/various drivetrain computers) in all AMG/F/P is rather remarkable....

Really should drive an '09 CL63 030/65 in mtn twisties to judge for self....after doing back-to-backs in twisties, I passed on getting the rather dynamically superb SL63 030 to get '09 CL65 instead....(hate the brake pedal feel of SL vs CL; much prefer the grip/bolsters of the AMG CL sport seats over the elderly-tech seats of AMG SL)....

Last-gen (?'01-'06) AMG CL was clearly a car w/a high-powered motor, but w/underwhelming, non-confidence-inspiring luxury car-oriented steering/chassis/brakes....
Well...the brakes are essentially the same between the W215 and W216 CL65's. The W216 CL65 is 200+lbs greater than the W215 CL65. Yes, the technology is more advanced in the new CL65...but the laws of physics still apply to a vehicle carrying such weight. If you want a great handling car...you probably shouldn't be looking at a Mercedes. If you are looking for a a luxurious coupe... with tons of power and decent handling for its size... step up to the CL.

I would never purchase the car (either W215 or W216) for $200K... unless of course I was worth 9 figures and made more from my deposits in one week. I think the OP was seeking advice based on a much smaller budget. It is pretty easy to come up with grandiose suggestions (myself included) when it is someone else's money.

Tom
Old 08-08-2008, 02:29 PM
  #35  
Member
Thread Starter
 
TonyJ89117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
997C2S
2005 CL65 for under $50k

What do you guys think about this CL65? I am fairly certain you could buy it for $45k. Is their any problem adding an aftermarket warranty (7r/100k) to a lemoned car that is still within the factory warranty period?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cars-....c0.m245.l1318

I have negotiated with a couple of people selling low mileage 2003 CL55's and it appears the magic number is easily under $30k for both. One has 45k miles and fully loaded w/ Distronic and the other loaded without Distronic (42k miles), but hot looking in black on tan.

However, if I can get a CL65 for less than $20k more than an 03' CL55 it almost seems like a no brainer.

What do you guys think?
Old 08-08-2008, 04:48 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TMC M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,895
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
I honestly think you can find one without the mfg (lemon law) buyback for similar mileage for marginally more money (maybe $5k). Your point on an aftermarket warranty is valid. I am not sure it is worth the potential headache... I would pay a little extra for some peace of mind...just my $.02.

Tom
Old 08-08-2008, 05:08 PM
  #37  
Super Member
 
canes85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 S600
What was the issue that caused it to be a buy back?
I've talk to to a MB rep previously regarding buy backs and it usually to keep high dollar customers happy. The issue may not be something major.
What ever you decide a warranty is a MUST. Run the VIN at your local MB dealership to get the specifics.
Old 08-08-2008, 06:18 PM
  #38  
Member
Thread Starter
 
TonyJ89117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
997C2S
Originally Posted by TMC M5
I honestly think you can find one without the mfg (lemon law) buyback for similar mileage for marginally more money (maybe $5k). Your point on an aftermarket warranty is valid. I am not sure it is worth the potential headache... I would pay a little extra for some peace of mind...just my $.02.

Tom
If that is the case, I am in complete agreement with you. At these prices, the CL65 makes the CL55/600 obsolete.
Old 08-08-2008, 06:20 PM
  #39  
Member
Thread Starter
 
TonyJ89117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
997C2S
Originally Posted by canes85
What was the issue that caused it to be a buy back?
I've talk to to a MB rep previously regarding buy backs and it usually to keep high dollar customers happy. The issue may not be something major.
What ever you decide a warranty is a MUST. Run the VIN at your local MB dealership to get the specifics.
I have a message to the seller and looking forward to see why Mercedes bought back the car. Hopefully, it is not due to persistent electrical problems.
Old 08-08-2008, 06:34 PM
  #40  
Member
Thread Starter
 
TonyJ89117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
997C2S
Damn, the CL65 sold for $50k.

Oh well, the search continues...
Old 09-01-2008, 02:37 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sound 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: U.K.
Posts: 2,838
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
SL 63 W/B AMG , S600,C220
sound 8

Heh!! listen to the guy, he said that handling is the most important, be honest with him,you don't buy a Merc for handling.
But if it's power,comfort,looks,build quality etc then buy a AMG.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CL55 vs CL600: Which is the better overall performance car (speed and handling)?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM.