RENNtech Powder Module for CLE53 AMG Tune
I only have a few pics because it's Michigan and I've been busy lately. Trust me...I'd like to have more...but...life. Attaching what I have for now.
Definitely going to have to burn off the summer tires.
I have other pics, but they include my plate, and I don't feel like scrubbing that off or whatever. I'd include the dealer site that has like 50 pics, but that would show the VIN...blah blah blah.
Shouldn't you be scouting properties in Monaco or getting ready to hop on your PJ for the next F1 race, instead of telling folks buying '$100K cars' they're not buying the right tunes?
Shouldn't you be scouting properties in Monaco or getting ready to hop on your PJ for the next F1 race, instead of telling folks buying '$100K cars' they're not buying the right tunes?
Just because its not throwing a cel at the moment… doesn't mean you aren't doing damage everyday using it. Maybe you can install the nitrous kit on alibaba.
Saying renntech has inferior products 😭😭😭
boost targets, safety margins and timing completely different…..
Any one have experience with them yet? Might be to early to ask but wanted to start the thread anyway!
Link:
https://www.renntechmercedes.com/ind...53-1278-detail
The other one I think you're talking about is by Racechip I'm just significantly cheaper for a similar outcome. https://www.racechip.us/shop/mercede...-438lb-ft.html
Does this look similar to the increased output alleged by RENNtech? I really don't know much about this so maybe you know more and can explain to me?
Has anyone tried one of these on the cle-53? Is there a big difference?.
Does anyone know the difference between the dyno tested horsepower and the regular horsepower numbers put out by the manufacturer?
I've been waiting for engine dyno of the CLE53 but their own Dyno curve numbers don't agree with what they state in the words below.
Curves, Stock: 414HP/435TQ vs Words, Stock: 493HP/517TQ
Curves, Chip: 455HP/470TQ vs Words, Chip: 541HP/571TQ
Curve Chip-Stock: 41HP/35 TQ vs Words Chip-Stock: 48HP/54TQ
I am very pleased with the Renntech stock rear wheel dyno numbers. I have heard that MB/AMG under-rates their engine power but there is a lot of confusion between Power measured at the engine vs the rear wheels. I have to think that MB rates their engine power at the engine, with no drivetrain losses, and the Renntech dyno is rear wheel only, so the M256 looks really good. The math using the Renntech words adds up, the difference between the Renntech Stock Dyno and the Renntech words is 19%, which is more than the 16% Renntech claims to use to compensate for drivetrain losses. And if both numbers are rear wheel then I don't know where this power increase comes from.
I think that the dyno curves are accutate and 41HP/35TQ gains are reasonable for a mild tune with increased boost and the accompanying fuel and timing mapping. Power you will feel but it ain't 541HP/571TQ no matter which way you calculate the numbers.
P.S. 414 RWHP translates to 480 Engine HP using a 16% drivetrain loss, pretty good!
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Bro, 12 on 1/4 mile is so so good. You done any measures on the 0-60 yet? I keep hearing 3.8s floating around. I love this car and can't wait to reach 1K miles lol.
The MB ECU doesn't understand why there is additional boost, so it believes the waste gate is stuck closed, throwing the CEL. Doesn't affect performance whatsoever. It's the reason Burger needs someone to stop by with a 53 to code a solution.
With an E blend, you should be seeing 97-99ish octane? Maybe a point or two lower w/CA 91, but that’s the whole point of an E blend. Pump them numbers up.
Last edited by blakers; Dec 12, 2025 at 06:22 PM.
With an E blend, you should be seeing 97-99ish octane? Maybe a point or two lower w/CA 91, but that’s the whole point of an E blend. Pump them numbers up.










