How you guys like this car.
Trending Topics
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 5,660
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2000 CLK430
I just dont know...
Has this picture been in here before??? I think i remember it for some reason. Anyway, while the car looks like it has been professionally done, in my opinion it is proof that more is not better. Theres just too much goin on. BenzE was right, it has gills.......
Just looked at the picture again, those are CL tail lights, am i right?
Just looked at the picture again, those are CL tail lights, am i right?
Last edited by Petie; 07-21-2002 at 11:43 AM.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
2 Posts
W212 E63, Audi R8 4.2, Panamera S, Range Rover Sport GT
I give much props for trying to be different and unique, but overdone in my opinion. It just looks very "plasticy" IMO. Once again, props for doing a lot of hard work.
#20
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: the OC, So Cal
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2000 CLK 320
As one article stated, the CLK "demands attention silently." That CLK is too "wild" already and its screaming for attention. It looks like its ready to take off. I like the subtle kits that let their presence be known yet still makes the car looks nice. Lorinser is one of those kits but I'm not too fond of those fender reverse intake/gills. I agree that the kit on that car also does look very plasticky.