CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

CLK32K vs CLK500, which one will be faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-20-2002, 09:33 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
e_one09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West LA
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
///M3
CLK32K vs CLK500, which one will be faster?

CLK320 with Kleemann Kompressor versus the new CLK500, which is faster? Anyone? Ben?
Old 11-20-2002, 11:27 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Petie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 5,660
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2000 CLK430
CLK32K has 330 hp, it will be faster than the CLK500......
Old 11-20-2002, 11:33 PM
  #3  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
e_one09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West LA
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
///M3
That's what I thought too, but in 0-60 time CLK32K (330 hp) claims 6.0 sec in C&D mag but CLK500 (302 hp) claims 5.7 sec in mbusa.com.
Old 11-20-2002, 11:45 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Petie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 5,660
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2000 CLK430
Originally posted by e_one09
That's what I thought too, but in 0-60 time CLK32K (330 hp) claims 6.0 sec in C&D mag but CLK500 (302 hp) claims 5.7 sec in mbusa.com.
hmmm....who knows, but if i was going to race, i think i would want the CLK32K regardless of the numbers......
Old 11-21-2002, 06:16 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ahmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,545
Received 154 Likes on 125 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
Hmmmm... if the CLK500 does 5.7 then we can all assume that the CLK55 AMG should be under 5 seconds!

I doubt it honestly!
Old 11-21-2002, 08:15 AM
  #6  
Member
 
Bjorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK
On mbusa's website, the new clk55:

"The most powerful naturally aspirated engine Mercedes-Benz has ever offered in the United States lies at the heart of the CLK55 AMG Coupe. Eager to keep pace with your every command, this handcrafted 362-hp V8 cranks out over 375 lb-ft of torque and rockets the CLK from 0 to 60 in five seconds flat. "

Not too much more than the current clk55 + doesnt the new clk weigh a lot more?
Old 11-21-2002, 01:10 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ted Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,436
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
300ce
...............I have a CLK 32k with boostkit that gives 345HP at the crank. My best o-60 time has been 5.6 secs. My car has more HP and weighs less than a CLk500. Also CLk32K has rear differential ratio of 3.07 while CLk 500 is 2.87. Other than MBUSA's claim of 0-60 of 5.7secs for the CLK 500, I don't think there is any chance that a stock CLk 500 will come close to my car.


Ted
Old 11-21-2002, 01:44 PM
  #8  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
e_one09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: West LA
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
///M3
Alright, so now it is clear that CLK32K can beat CLK500. My next question is, is there a chance for CLK32K with some extra modifications to beat e46 M3?
Old 11-21-2002, 02:41 PM
  #9  
Out Of Control!!
 
Mach430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Headers, 3.27 diff, pulleys, luck.
Old 11-21-2002, 09:40 PM
  #10  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
BlackC230Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 12,403
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Fast Cars!
Originally posted by Mach430
Headers, 3.27 diff, pulleys, luck.
does evosport sell that last mod?
Old 11-22-2002, 02:55 AM
  #11  
Out Of Control!!
 
Mach430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 35,855
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
As a service to our customers, we throw it in free with the majority of orders placed.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLK32K vs CLK500, which one will be faster?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.