CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

0-60 Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-30-2011, 03:13 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
0-60 Times

How about everyone breakout their Smartphones download some apps and post their 0-60s.

I hear that for iPhones the "Dynolicious" app is good. As for the Android, I used the "aDyno" app but according to my research people with slower phones aDyno is not that great.
  • 2000 CLK 320
  • 85K miles
  • 0-60 in 6.17s
  • aDyno v1.0.4 Android Application

Drag Strip (Data Rate 10ms)
  • 60' : 2.719 secs
  • 330' : 6.562 secs
  • 1/8 mile : 9.639 secs @ 82.5 mph

Acceleration
  • 0-10mph : 0.870 secs
  • 0-20mph : 1.782 secs
  • 0-30mph : 2.712 secs
  • 0-40mph : 3.683 secs
  • 0-50mph : 4.884 secs
  • 0-60mph : 6.174 secs
  • 0-70mph : 7.493 secs
  • 0-80mph : 9.122 secs

Peaks
  • Acceleration : 0.697 g
  • Speed : 82.6 mph
  • Distance : 864.9 ft

Old 09-30-2011, 03:15 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
0-60 Perspective - Thanks MarcusF

w208 CLK55..............4.9s
Curb weight................3,485
Horsepower @ rpm.....342 @ 5,500
Torque @ rpm:............376 @ 3,000

w208 CLK430.............6.1s
Curb weight.................3,365
Horsepower @ rpm......275 @ 5,750
Torque @ rpm:.............295 @ 3,000-4,000

W210 E430...............6.2s
Curb weight................3,757
Horsepower @ rpm.....275 @ 5,750
Torque @ rpm.............295 @ 3,000-4,000

R129 SL500 (2001)....6.2s
Curb weight...................4,165
Horsepower @ rpm........302 @ 5,600
Torque @ rpm................339 @ 2,700-4,250

R129 SL500 (1998)....6.3s
Curb weight...................4,165
Horsepower @ rpm........315 @ 5,600
Torque @ rpm................347 @ 3,900

w202 C36 (1996).....6.3s (6.9 per MB USA)

Curb weight................3,757
Horsepower @ rpm.....276 @ 5,750
Torque @ rpm.............284 @ 4,000

w208 CLK320............6.9
Curb weight.................3,265 (3,140 Japan)
Horsepower @ rpm......215 @ 5,700
Torque @ rpm..............229 @ 3,000-4,600
Old 09-30-2011, 05:20 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
00Mercedes320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
00 clk 320
"someone I know" raced a BMW 530i maybe a 2005 or 2006 on the freeway. and "this person" had a CLK 320 2000 and hit the 131mph mark making the engine shut off. But the BMW kept on going. So I'd imagine his was llimited at 155mph? How could a 530i beat a CLK 320?
Old 09-30-2011, 10:55 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
Originally Posted by 00Mercedes320
"someone I know" raced a BMW 530i maybe a 2005 or 2006 on the freeway. and "this person" had a CLK 320 2000 and hit the 131mph mark making the engine shut off. But the BMW kept on going. So I'd imagine his was llimited at 155mph? How could a 530i beat a CLK 320?
Too many variables, was the BMW stock or had some tuning done?
"Car and Driver" lists the 0-60 test results for a 2005 BMW 530i at being 6.9 seconds which is the same as the CLK 320.
My 320 numbers are an exception because I have tuning done.
Old 10-02-2011, 05:12 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
GiZzO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK55 / E350 Coupe
Do i seriously need to fill out everything including curb weight and such?
Old 10-02-2011, 07:48 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
Originally Posted by GiZzO
Do i seriously need to fill out everything including curb weight and such?
Instructions: 0-60 Timed Runs need only the Pitch Characteristics for accurate times. All the other data is used for the dyno info. There are multiple sub app categories in this application. We are concerned with the "Timed Run" sub app. To gather my pitch information I used the AcMeter android app which measures G-Force, Pitch, Roll, X, Y, Z axis, and Speed.

I used a few other apps to measure pitch and came up with my Pitch being 4.0. I did a run with the default 2.0 and there was only 0.02 difference in speed calculations. Not even sure if that had anything to do with it because the afternoon run at lunchtime was 6.19 and the run the next day late night was 6.17.

I think I will remeasure. I found some interesting information.





Last edited by Williams707; 10-02-2011 at 10:51 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 0-60 Times



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.