CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Marcus F., your brilliance is requested

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-23-2011, 12:06 AM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
Marcus F., your brilliance is requested

Are these stats accurate and if not do you know what the stats are for what I have listed below?

Year, 2000
Description, CLK 320

0 to 60 mph 6.9 sec
1/4 mile (E.T.) 15.2 sec

Final-drive ratio..........3.07:1

Wheelbase..........105.9 in
Track, F/R..........59.3/58.0 in
Length..........180.2 in
Width..........67.8 in
Height..........53.0 in

CdA = 6.4976
Frontal area..........21.4 sq ft
Drag Coefficient = 0.31
Curb weight..........3240

(F:0.9-2.0" / R:0.8-2.0")
Pitch Charachteristics =
Rolling Resistance =

Pitch = 2.0
Roll = 2.5
Drive Train Losses = 15.0
Rolling Resistance = 0.015

Min Speed RPM = 2000.0 @ 000 mph
Max Speed RPM = 5700.0 @ 000 mph

Min Speed =
Max Speed =

Last edited by Williams707; 09-23-2011 at 08:21 PM.
Old 09-23-2011, 01:21 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
According to the aDyno Android application "Need Pitch Characteristics for accurate 0-60, quarter mile times."

My 0-60 currently reads 6.19sec

This run was from one stop light to the next. By the time I got to 60 it was time to slow it down.
Attached Thumbnails Marcus F., your brilliance is requested-adynop20110823_1220.jpg  

Last edited by Williams707; 09-23-2011 at 01:37 AM.
Old 09-23-2011, 02:00 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MarcusF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SCV SoCal
Posts: 3,784
Received 77 Likes on 61 Posts
2002 CLK430
No brilliance on my part, I just report what they tell me

Per the 2001 MB USA press kit (I tossed / can't find / lost the 2000 kit but they are the same), these are the differences:
  • MB doesn't list quarter mile times.
  • The height is listed at 54 inches (but they list that for the 320, 430, and 55)
  • I don't know what CdA is, byt the aerodynamic drag (Cd) you listed is right.
  • I don't know the frontal area.
  • US models were rated at 3265 pounds for the CLK320 coupe, but they have 4 cats rather than your two. That might be 25 pounds.

I don't know pitch characteristics, rolling resistance, or drive train losses. They don't list that in the new press kits either.

I keep a lot of W208 stats here.

I do know your speed @ RPM numbers, but these are only good if the tires have the same diameter as the original Michelins (close on others though):

1st gear @ 6000 RPM 38.6 MPH
2nd gear @ 6000 RPM 63.4 MPH
3rd gear @ 6000 RPM 98.3 MPH
4th gear @ 6000 RPM 138.7 MPH
5th gear @ 4800 RPM 155 MPH (electronically limited)

I hope that helps.
Old 09-23-2011, 02:43 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
Thanks Boss

Ok found the formula.. http://ecomodder.com/wiki/index.php/...t_of_Drag_List

CdA formula = Cd * Frontal Area (Duhh) lol

So CdA = 6.634 given the Frontal Area number is correct/accurate.

I visit your site often for reference and information.

My diameters of my 20's is pretty much the same as stock. Can't remember exactly but it was only off by just a few i.e. 0.02.

According to the aDyno app, to have a accurate 0-60 I need the following information:

[Pitch Characteristics 2.00 degrees/G - (pitch angel @1G acceleration)]

Hopefully the "Oracle" will have answers - GGLE

Last edited by Williams707; 09-23-2011 at 02:57 AM.
Old 09-24-2011, 08:40 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dlbehrns's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99CLK320,
your brilliance is requested

You takin' to me?
Old 09-24-2011, 11:38 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
Originally Posted by dlbehrns
You takin' to me?
Yes, show me your 0-60 times
Old 09-24-2011, 02:08 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dlbehrns's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99CLK320,
back in the day

back in the day, when I had a black series motor, I couldn't afford the gas as the mileage was horrible so I sold it and settled for my good old 320. The 1/4 mile times I never bothered with. It was my daily driver. Hey, I have a great bridge in NYC I could sell yah if'n yer interested.
Old 09-24-2011, 02:53 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Williams707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 1,263
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
2000 CLK 320
Pretty much got all my details dialed into this aDyno android application.
Just need the Rolling Resistance data which I emailed Nitto tires.

Did another 0-60 run today and clocked in at 6.174 secs

Old 10-03-2011, 03:30 AM
  #9  
Member
 
AMG_BENZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None
Is there a way to remove the speed limit?
Old 10-03-2011, 06:57 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dlbehrns's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99CLK320,
Yes. You have to take or send your ECU to a chip tuner that will reflash it for you.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Marcus F., your brilliance is requested



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.