CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

01 CLK 430 longevity?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-02-2004, 03:07 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
elsidster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
01 CLK 430 longevity?

I'm trying to choose between a Starmarked 2001 CLK430 with 39K and a 2001 BMW 540iw/sport with 14K. I wanted to keep the car for about 5-7 years, a little past the extended warranty. I've driven and like both cars, though I know they each have their pluses/minuses.

Is keeping the CLK until 100K something reasonable to expect without major maintenance(eg new transmission), or should I be hesitant to keep it after the warranty expires(2007)?

Thanks!
Old 02-02-2004, 04:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
simon78's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi Q7
I say go with the 540 !

you get a saloon , and a sport car at the same time.
Old 02-02-2004, 05:36 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
J Lucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The President must win the Peace
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you also take into account your gaining or losing 2 doors?
Old 02-02-2004, 05:43 PM
  #4  
jnx
Junior Member
 
jnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is price an issue ? The Mileage on the CLK would not bother me, Both cars will last to 100k miles easily if you take care of them and give the proper maintenance. It is just what you prefer.
Old 02-02-2004, 06:15 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
theine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Genoa, NV
Posts: 1,438
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 GLK250 BlueTec & 2009 ML320 BlueTec
Either car will last you over 100,000 miles properly maintained. It's up to you to decide if you wan't a coupe or a sedan.
Old 02-02-2004, 07:04 PM
  #6  
jnx
Junior Member
 
jnx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Theine, Nice lookin car.
Old 02-02-2004, 08:05 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Josh K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Heights, CA
Posts: 2,781
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Tesla Model S
I currently have 105K miles on my 430 and it runs like the day I bought it new. :0) There's a lot to be said for good maintenance...
Old 02-02-2004, 08:24 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
theine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Genoa, NV
Posts: 1,438
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2014 GLK250 BlueTec & 2009 ML320 BlueTec
Originally posted by jnx
Theine, Nice lookin car.
Thanks.
Old 02-02-2004, 09:24 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SoCalCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,974
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2017 W205 C43 AMG
Smile Go CLK 430!

Overall it is the sexier car, a little more rare than the 540 and having a Mercedes coupe is always a good move!
Old 02-02-2004, 10:10 PM
  #10  
Almost a Member!
 
khans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's a tradeoff.

Do you want the driveability or the looks.

BMW 540 is a great car - manual transmission, haven't driven one but I think it's more a drivers car - will drive much better than a CLk 430.

CLK430 has one of the best lines of any car out there. Looks much better than a 540 IMHO.

I own a CLK 430 and if I were to do it again the 540 would definitely be on my short list.

Buy both!!
Old 02-02-2004, 10:56 PM
  #11  
Member
 
PerformanceCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK, X5
clk 430 is the way

My family ironically owns both of the two cars you are considering, and from what i can say, i agree with other comments about the 2 vs. 4 doors, essentially making the clk 430 more of a fun car to drive, and the 540i more of a fun car to be driven in. Plus, the mileage dosn't seem to be much of an issue, I believe when my dad traded in his old 99 430 last year it had close to 100K and there wasn't anything that had changed since the day he bought it (performance or maintanance wise).
On the other hand, you'd be happy with either
Old 02-12-2004, 01:13 AM
  #12  
Member
 
krk230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1990 560SEL, 1993 190E 2.3, 2001 BMW M5
both are sexy cars...




Last edited by krk230; 02-12-2004 at 02:02 AM.
Old 02-12-2004, 02:01 AM
  #13  
Member
 
djantlive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I'd vote for 540 since I'm more inclined to a mid size sedan than 2 door coupe. I don't like Bimmers though but I do think you'll get better value with the 540.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 01 CLK 430 longevity?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.