*** Hi Tech Racing CLK Pictures ***
04-07-2002, 09:16 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's pretty ugly. Doesn't even look like the fit on the front fascia is that good. I kinda like the addition of the S (or are they CL?) taillights, but overall I call RICE! 
04-08-2002, 10:39 AM
#4
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK55 and Yukon Denali
Those tailights look very CL-ish. Do you have a clearer view of them? I think that may be neat- as for the rest of the car it reminds me of those 959 kits that people put over old karman Ghia's... CHEESE.
04-08-2002, 11:10 AM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
I think I saw that in the new Dr. Dre video...
The sexiest part on a 208 was the rear, and it was ruined by that fugly kit. That is probably the UGLIEST CLK I have ever seen, it is truly FUBAR.
The sexiest part on a 208 was the rear, and it was ruined by that fugly kit. That is probably the UGLIEST CLK I have ever seen, it is truly FUBAR.
Trending Topics
04-08-2002, 01:37 PM
#8
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SoCal & Taiwan
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK430
Re: *** Hi Tech Racing CLK Pictures ***
Originally posted by LowRydeR
These pictures might be old to some of you but I still wanna share them with all CLK owners.
These pictures might be old to some of you but I still wanna share them with all CLK owners.
04-08-2002, 06:58 PM
#9
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rear lights, rear lights, rear lights !!!! Theat's the only thing worth viewing. Do you have a better picature of the rear. Were did they get the lights from???? Let us know !!!
04-09-2002, 03:59 AM
#12
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 MB C230 SS 6spd, Navi
You guys are just being snobby, paint his car grey add stickers and harden up the lines and what do you get a CLK DTM
<img src="https://mbworld.org/upload/2001/CLKDTMEVOSPORTROCKS.jpg" border="0" alt="">
<img src="https://mbworld.org/upload/2001/CLKDTMEVOSPORTROCKS.jpg" border="0" alt="">
04-09-2002, 10:00 AM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Center of Universe
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK55, Mini S
My opinion of this car could be swayed greatly by knowing what is under the hood -- say a Brabus V12, and I think it may be a hell of a ride, but say it has a 320 engine...and I am ROTFLMAO at a ricer supreme.
04-09-2002, 10:11 AM
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,545
Received 154 Likes
on
125 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
AND WHAT IS WRONG WITH A 320 ENGINE MAY I ASK...THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
PROBABLY ONE OF ( IF NOT THE ONLY ) BEST V6 ENGINES I HAVE EVER HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF EXPERIENCING.
PROBABLY ONE OF ( IF NOT THE ONLY ) BEST V6 ENGINES I HAVE EVER HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF EXPERIENCING.
04-09-2002, 10:26 AM
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Afghanistan / South Florida / Camp Lejeune, NC
Posts: 6,261
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
2008 BMW M6, 2008 Ducati 1098, 2008 Ducati Monster S2R1000, 1971 Ducati Scrambler
Come to think of it, I do agree with Hmrdwn.
If that CLK has a V12, then the outside would look beautiful... I can't explain it, hehe.
Ahmed, there is nothing wrong with the 320 engine. What I beleive hmrdwn is trying to sayis that the body kit and whatnot is designed to give it a "performance" feel, and well, the 320 V6 engine is definetly not a performance engine.
If that CLK has a V12, then the outside would look beautiful... I can't explain it, hehe.
Ahmed, there is nothing wrong with the 320 engine. What I beleive hmrdwn is trying to sayis that the body kit and whatnot is designed to give it a "performance" feel, and well, the 320 V6 engine is definetly not a performance engine.
04-09-2002, 10:59 AM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M3 Cab
Originally posted by accord
Come to think of it, I do agree with Hmrdwn.
If that CLK has a V12, then the outside would look beautiful... I can't explain it, hehe.
Come to think of it, I do agree with Hmrdwn.
If that CLK has a V12, then the outside would look beautiful... I can't explain it, hehe.
04-09-2002, 12:47 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Center of Universe
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK55, Mini S
Ahmed,
Accord is correct regarding the reasoning behind my post. I have nothing against the 3.2 engine. I love it in my wife's wagon...and I'm sure that Chrysler is going to love it in the Crossfire.
Accord is correct regarding the reasoning behind my post. I have nothing against the 3.2 engine. I love it in my wife's wagon...and I'm sure that Chrysler is going to love it in the Crossfire.
04-09-2002, 12:57 PM
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,545
Received 154 Likes
on
125 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
ooooooookay everyone.....
aaaahm.... I'm just gonna go to a corner now and sulk.
don't mind me if I start crying my eyes out okay?
bye now....
take care..
I'm going now........
.........
sniff sniff.....
aaaahm.... I'm just gonna go to a corner now and sulk.
don't mind me if I start crying my eyes out okay?
bye now....
take care..
I'm going now........
.........
sniff sniff.....
