THEORETICALLY SPEAKING IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SELF CONCIOUS THOUGHT I HAVE ARRIVED AT THE REALIZATION THAT AN OLDER MODEL CLK MIGHT NOT BE AS APPEALING AS THE 2003 HYUNDAI XG350.

HERES THE FACTS

CLK-2 YEAR WARRANTY, YEAR=97, 86,000 MILES. $25,900

HYUNDAI-10 YEAR WARRANTY, 2002, SHOWROOM MILES. $21,000!

WHAT A DILLEMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PLEASE HELP

 

How can you compare a Hyundai to a BENZ? The Mercedes is far more superior, so go with the Benz.

"The Don"

 

I just saw the XG350, nice car, nice warranty, I think you would be better on that car, you seem to be a person worried about cost-efectiveness, viewed from that point a CLK might not be a good choice, any maintenance repair on a MB will be considerable higher than the Hyundai, for example Oil change and brakes.

 

For $18,500 value, check out this one:

2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
V6 2dr Coupe (2.7L 6cyl 6M)

http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/roadt...1/article.html


My personal choice, after 12 months and 10,000 fun-filled FLAWLESS miles:
The 2002 Acura RSX Type-S

http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/compa...1/page011.html

...and all this fun and quality product for only $23,400!

 

my mom refuses to drive Huyandis. but if u want to compare these two than u should get the huyandi. Longer warranties etc. They are not bad cars. The quality has improved and the look has 2.

my 2cents.

LIL Raja

 

THANKS FOR THE INPUT IM STILL CONSIDERING ALL POSSIBILITIES. EVERYTHING IS UP IN THE AIR.

 

I thought the CLK (W208) came out in 1998??

 

My Mom prefers Harleys. Good investment! (humor)