CLK350 vs CLK500 ride quality?
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
2006 BMW 330i Sport 6 Speed
CLK350 vs CLK500 ride quality?
Has anyone taken back to test drives with the CLK350 and CLK500? I am curious how they compare with regard to ride quality?
Also, how much of a difference does the Sport Package make?
With BMW, the Sport Package makes a significant differnce with improved handling....however the ride quality is reduced quite a bit.
Thanks,
Mike
Also, how much of a difference does the Sport Package make?
With BMW, the Sport Package makes a significant differnce with improved handling....however the ride quality is reduced quite a bit.
Thanks,
Mike
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
My experience with both is only with the Cabs. Both are the same and are cruisers, comfortable even on rough NE roads. However. they have performance tires that really stick during fast street driving.
Not counting the AMG G-Class, I don't think MB has made a car that was "too stiff" for the average driver since the origional CE of the mid '90's.
Not counting the AMG G-Class, I don't think MB has made a car that was "too stiff" for the average driver since the origional CE of the mid '90's.
Almost a Member!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MagicO309D
My experience with both is only with the Cabs. Both are the same and are cruisers, comfortable even on rough NE roads. However. they have performance tires that really stick during fast street driving.
Not counting the AMG G-Class, I don't think MB has made a car that was "too stiff" for the average driver since the origional CE of the mid '90's.
Not counting the AMG G-Class, I don't think MB has made a car that was "too stiff" for the average driver since the origional CE of the mid '90's.
I've not driven the AMG either.
Best of Luck!
- Thinker
