Need help
My GF wants to buy a CLK.
When did the body style change?
On ebay the 2003's have the earlier headlights where the 2004s are the new design. Here on the forum it lists the 209s as 2003 models. Confusing.
What years were the most reliable and least?
Were the 208s better/worse then the 209s?
What is the best choice for used car warranty?
Thanks everyone in advance.
Last edited by RJC; Jun 24, 2007 at 02:52 PM.
I believe 2004 was the first year for the W209 Convertible, meaning the 2003 'vert is a W208.
One concern I have had is the legendary Mercedes quality seems to have been very much in question lately. I am not sure how long and to what extent. I want her to have a highly reliable car especially since being a used car purchase with maybe no available factory warranty.
So, the convertible gets the 209 upgrades in 2004 vs 2003 for the coupe... that is odd.
Was there that much difference in the basic car for the change or was it largely cosmetic? IOW, would a 2004 convertible be more worrisome than a 2005 or is the reported quality more of a concern in the later years?
My caveat is that the car only has 32,000 miles on it, so there may be gremlins waiting down the line. But I'll buy an extended warranty once the factory coverage expires to cover wear and tear and failure issues.
I was also able to give the VIN to my local MB dealer before I purchased the car, and learned that any and all applicable service issues had been taken care of or checked.
IF I'm not mistaken, it could cost a lot more for an extended warranty if you wait until after your factory warranty expires.
My 2004 CLK500 has only 24k miles and I just recently purchased an extended warranty and was told that it's more expensive to purchase after the factory warranty expires.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Also, MB won't sell extended warranties for cars older than 2005.
I have three quotes from the largest warranty companies for bumper-to-bumper, wear and tear plus failures repairs for anywhere from three to five years, and they are in the $1700 - $2000 range.
I received quotes from Warrantydirect.com, Warranties4wheels.com, and aaautowarrnty.com. The quotes I received were for my vehicle with 36,000 miles on it.
I have three quotes from the largest warranty companies for bumper-to-bumper, wear and tear plus failures repairs for anywhere from three to five years, and they are in the $1700 - $2000 range.
I received quotes from Warrantydirect.com, Warranties4wheels.com, and aaautowarrnty.com. The quotes I received were for my vehicle with 36,000 miles on it.
If you want "true" "Bumper to bumper" coverage, make sure the policy you sign lists what it DOESN'T cover. Not what it does cover. I've not come across a plan for $1,700 that I would consider "Bumper to bumper". I think that term gets used far too loosely when it comes to aftermarket warranties.
One of the biggest things that goes wrong with these CLK's is the radiator leaking coolant into the transmission, requiring a replacement of the radiator and transmission. Most aftermarket warranties I've seen in that price range, won't replace the radiator.
Search this forum for posts by Toog4me. He convinced me to call a specific person at Continental warranty to get the best coverage that is most like the factory warranty. I don't know if my warranty is the best there is but what really made me feel good about it was that it lists specifically what it DOESN'T cover. Anything not on that list IS covered.
I don't think it's any secret as Toog4me posted it in another thread. But it seems the best person to speak to is Kenny Hilton @ Continental Warranty. (888) 244-0925 X2615. Call him after 3 P.M. PST.


