2006 CLK 55 -vs- 2007 CLK 550 Cabriolets
2)You were foolish enough to buy an old CL55 (2001, non-kompressor) and spend/waste thousands more with HPS (hahahaha) trying to achieve more power.
3)You were one of the fools who did not realize the 2001 CL was underpowered and wasted your money on that car, and the thousands more with HPS (again, hahahahaha). Don't hate on the CLK55 because of your experience. Hate your own stupidity for buying the wrong car.
.
1)Thanks for the personal attacked and I can see you're doing very well for someone with better education.
I'm happy for you finally upgrade from a Clk 430 to an Clk 55 since i meet you more then 10 years ago. I don't blame you for feeling being on top of the world with the 3 letters words on your trunk. Enjoy it man. Btw, mext time, race a Clk 550 and I gaurantee you want to sell that thing and get the Clk 550 right away.2)As for being a foolish that I bought the CL 55, that's alright because at that time, you can only dream of AMG cars. Mercedes sold thousand of them world wide. I guess you didn't get one because you're smarter then all of them.........or you can't afford it? I'm happy that your dream finally came ture for you. Happy motoring.
3) kleeman, Renntech....etc sold alot of supercharger kit to Clk 55 and C55 owners. Hmmmm........I wonder why all those owners bought the kit? Could it be they bought the wrong car because they're "stupid" or felt the same as me about the underpower NA 5.4 AMG engine?
Last edited by Klinh; Jul 26, 2009 at 02:50 AM.
I noticed that you are on suspension, now, huh? Perhaps you should edit you posts again and get back on topic.
The answer to the OP's question is very subjective, as this thread has shown. Each car has its + and -, it just depends on what the buyer values more. Either way, you're getting a good car.
I noticed that you are on suspension, now, huh? Perhaps you should edit you posts again and get back on topic.
The answer to the OP's question is very subjective, as this thread has shown. Each car has its + and -, it just depends on what the buyer values more. Either way, you're getting a good car.
Andy
Something else to consider: Mercedes-Benz makes many different models - 'flavors' if you will. Some opt for an AMG, some do not. Just look at the R230 SL600 vs. the SL55. HP was rated the same on the V12tt and blown V8 versions, but appealed to totally different buyers. There were many comparisons done both here on MBW and in the press between these two cars.
I think you should also be mindful of context when comparing different model years, etc. AMG made the highest performance vehicle for each model line at the time of release. Are there current non-AMG cars that have equal or better performance that previously-released AMGs? Of course there are! The hand-built 342, 349, 355 or 362 hp 5.4Ls were installed in the W202 (AMG manufaktur), W203, W208, W209, W210, W215, W220, and R171. It is by no means a poor-mans AMG, unless you're only considering the current market value of these cars and nothing else.
The engine is (though very important) also just one piece of the performance enhancements that are part of each factory produced AMG. Upgraded brakes, transmission and suspension, as well as a host of interior options (more aggressive seat bolsters, sport steering wheel, etc.) add to the overall performance enjoyment.
Enjoy your ride(s)!
Last edited by Chappy; Jul 27, 2009 at 02:07 PM.
AMG cars are not just badging. that is why they are so cool. they take a great car like the CLK for instance and they give you a stronger, more powerful, better performing engine. they give you more stopping power with huge factory brakes, better factory suspension, mandrel bent exhaust, upgraded interior, and very sporty transmission mapping for improved drive feel and throttle response.
you sure seem bitter in your posts. the only reason people are defending the AMG so vehemently is that you are simply out of line. it is one thing to voice your opinion but it is a completely different thing to be flat out wrong.
arent you the same guy that put coilovers on his car only to go back to lowering springs? not sure i would even trust your opinion after something like that. even the cheapest coilovers are a better option for lowering a car than just springs. it is simply a function of suspension travel.
AMG cars are not just badging. that is why they are so cool. they take a great car like the CLK for instance and they give you a stronger, more powerful, better performing engine. they give you more stopping power with huge factory brakes, better factory suspension, mandrel bent exhaust, upgraded interior, and very sporty transmission mapping for improved drive feel and throttle response.
you sure seem bitter in your posts. the only reason people are defending the AMG so vehemently is that you are simply out of line. it is one thing to voice your opinion but it is a completely different thing to be flat out wrong.
arent you the same guy that put coilovers on his car only to go back to lowering springs? not sure i would even trust your opinion after something like that. even the cheapest coilovers are a better option for lowering a car than just springs. it is simply a function of suspension travel.

Sorry to go tottaly off-topic but, how so? I'm only asking because i been looking for a set of used KW V2's for my CLK550 but have had no luck so i figured i get a set of H&R springs and cut the deal coil in the front just to make the ride even. I don't track my car and i just want it lowered (nothing too crazy, the back of the H&R's is perfect, hell your drop is
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
however in my opinion there are some short comings with running a coilover set-up. The first is that you will need to run a spacer on the front if you are running stock wheels. if you are running aftermarket wheels and you want to go low (like me) you can not run anything greater than an 8" wheel. I run a 8x19 with a 20mm offset and 6" backspacing up front. you could run a 8.5" wheel up front but you will have to raise the ride height from where i am by at least 1.5 inches to clear the coilover perch.
you can run just springs on your car and get an even ride height. MB uses spring pads of various widths that allow you to tweak the ride height to get things even front to back. do a search and you will see what i mean. in other words you could go with springs that lower the car 1-1.5" and adjust the spring pads for the perfect all around look. you stock shocks/struts or a good set of aftermarket shocks/struts would probably work just fine.
again i am probably 2-2.5" lower than stock. i can almost slide an index finger between the top of the tire and the bottom of the fender. basically there is almost zero fender gap.
i know this is long winded but i want you to make an informed decision, outside of just your budget. the coilover set-up is more involved because you have to clear the perch, which could involve a spacer. they do limit your wheel options as well if you want to go really low. but i love the way the car rides. again i am slammed, i never bottom out, and the ride is perfect.
so if you are looking to spend less than $1000 you want to stay away from coilovers. if that is the case get you a good set of springs and play with the spring pads. from what i have read the pads are not expensive and they are genuine MB parts.
good luck!
however in my opinion there are some short comings with running a coilover set-up. The first is that you will need to run a spacer on the front if you are running stock wheels. if you are running aftermarket wheels and you want to go low (like me) you can not run anything greater than an 8" wheel. I run a 8x19 with a 20mm offset and 6" backspacing up front. you could run a 8.5" wheel up front but you will have to raise the ride height from where i am by at least 1.5 inches to clear the coilover perch.
you can run just springs on your car and get an even ride height. MB uses spring pads of various widths that allow you to tweak the ride height to get things even front to back. do a search and you will see what i mean. in other words you could go with springs that lower the car 1-1.5" and adjust the spring pads for the perfect all around look. you stock shocks/struts or a good set of aftermarket shocks/struts would probably work just fine.
again i am probably 2-2.5" lower than stock. i can almost slide an index finger between the top of the tire and the bottom of the fender. basically there is almost zero fender gap.
i know this is long winded but i want you to make an informed decision, outside of just your budget. the coilover set-up is more involved because you have to clear the perch, which could involve a spacer. they do limit your wheel options as well if you want to go really low. but i love the way the car rides. again i am slammed, i never bottom out, and the ride is perfect.
so if you are looking to spend less than $1000 you want to stay away from coilovers. if that is the case get you a good set of springs and play with the spring pads. from what i have read the pads are not expensive and they are genuine MB parts.
good luck!
Thank you for your info as this really helped. i think i'll be holding off on the springs and gonna go for a set of KW V2's or H&R coils.
i wanna slammmm my ride

however in my opinion there are some short comings with running a coilover set-up. The first is that you will need to run a spacer on the front if you are running stock wheels. if you are running aftermarket wheels and you want to go low (like me) you can not run anything greater than an 8" wheel. I run a 8x19 with a 20mm offset and 6" backspacing up front. you could run a 8.5" wheel up front but you will have to raise the ride height from where i am by at least 1.5 inches to clear the coilover perch.
you can run just springs on your car and get an even ride height. MB uses spring pads of various widths that allow you to tweak the ride height to get things even front to back. do a search and you will see what i mean. in other words you could go with springs that lower the car 1-1.5" and adjust the spring pads for the perfect all around look. you stock shocks/struts or a good set of aftermarket shocks/struts would probably work just fine.
again i am probably 2-2.5" lower than stock. i can almost slide an index finger between the top of the tire and the bottom of the fender. basically there is almost zero fender gap.
i know this is long winded but i want you to make an informed decision, outside of just your budget. the coilover set-up is more involved because you have to clear the perch, which could involve a spacer. they do limit your wheel options as well if you want to go really low. but i love the way the car rides. again i am slammed, i never bottom out, and the ride is perfect.
so if you are looking to spend less than $1000 you want to stay away from coilovers. if that is the case get you a good set of springs and play with the spring pads. from what i have read the pads are not expensive and they are genuine MB parts.
good luck!
I want to thank you all for your feedback in regards to the question I posted. I ended up purchasing a 07 CLK 550 cab with 16,500 miles on the clock. I would have loved to have pulled the trigger on a CLK 63 but I feel I have stimulated the economy enough with this purchase. Anyhow, I negotiated the purchase from the orginal asking price of $36,500 to $32,500 and feel very pleased with my choice. I'll post pictures as soon as I can. Thanks again for your knowledge and feedback.

Silver/black
Cabriolet
Nav
AMG package
I want to thank you all for your feedback in regards to the question I posted. I ended up purchasing a 07 CLK 550 cab with 16,500 miles on the clock. I would have loved to have pulled the trigger on a CLK 63 but I feel I have stimulated the economy enough with this purchase. Anyhow, I negotiated the purchase from the orginal asking price of $36,500 to $32,500 and feel very pleased with my choice. I'll post pictures as soon as I can. Thanks again for your knowledge and feedback.

Silver/black
Cabriolet
Nav
AMG package








