CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

SpeedTuning GB Evaluation.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-09-2010, 02:54 PM
  #76  
Out Of Control!!
 
dynomite05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jerzy
Posts: 10,275
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
04 CLK 320 > CLK32K
Originally Posted by Klinh
I said "probably" and there's NO way any one would know until they dyno the car. All tuners know what ideal air fuel ratio should be at for na engine (no more then 13.5:1 a/f ratio at WOT) and sc/turbo engine (no more then 12.0:1 a/f ratio at WOT). Since is a mail order tunes, it pretty much a stock tunes based on a stock car. Since most people car are not stock with mods like AMG air box, secondary CAT deleted...etc, they can kiss that a/f ratio ideally good bye. Because of people have different mods in their car, you can't apply the same files from one car to the next. The only way to be sure is to dyno the car and i'm surprised that NOT a single person here with the ECU upgrade dyno their car yet !!!

What makes you think they are applying the same tune to everybody's car?
Old 09-09-2010, 03:06 PM
  #77  
Banned
 
badblackbenz550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
benzo larenzo
Im going to dyno my car, if i lose to a stock 550 which should happen today.
Old 09-09-2010, 04:01 PM
  #78  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Klinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,632
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
C63s Cabriolet, BMW M4, Civic
Originally Posted by dynomite05
What makes you think they are applying the same tune to everybody's car?

They said that they can tuned based on what mods you have in your car but reality is, you CAN NOT tune it that way without having the car on the dyno and tune it live !!!!!! A mod like CAT deleted , AMG air box..etc, how do they know how much air is being suck in to provide enough fuel without running lean at WOT and enough timing that it won't cause detonation? I've been around the tuning shops and experienced with tuning for years on my cars and friend's cars and seen it all. Take my friend's C55 with Kleemann SC for example, all his mods are Kleemann and it take 3 ECU tuned from Kleemann just to get the air fuel ratio right. The funny thing was, we never knew there was any problems with the car because it run perfect and super strong until he dyno to find out how much power it make and find out that his air fuel ratio was way high. All this **** i'm saying sound like I'm try to put negative on this ECU tuning. To be honest, it for your own good to dyno your car and be safe. I've been there and done that and tell people how fast my CL55 is with HPS Supercharger based on BUTT DYNO but when I finally dyno my CL 55, I made just 25 rwhp more (instead of 125 hp more)and air fuel ratio at WOT was in the 17.0:1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here's the link to the 68 pages debates when me and my friend (AMGSC) has our car Supercharger installed.................btw, my old screen name is "CLK&SLK". I decided to changed it to get away from that whole mess after we sued them.


https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...er-hps-sc.html

Last edited by Klinh; 09-09-2010 at 04:13 PM.
Old 09-09-2010, 04:30 PM
  #79  
Out Of Control!!
 
dynomite05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jerzy
Posts: 10,275
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
04 CLK 320 > CLK32K
Originally Posted by Klinh
They said that they can tuned based on what mods you have in your car but reality is, you CAN NOT tune it that way without having the car on the dyno and tune it live !!!!!! A mod like CAT deleted , AMG air box..etc, how do they know how much air is being suck in to provide enough fuel without running lean at WOT and enough timing that it won't cause detonation? I've been around the tuning shops and experienced with tuning for years on my cars and friend's cars and seen it all. Take my friend's C55 with Kleemann SC for example, all his mods are Kleemann and it take 3 ECU tuned from Kleemann just to get the air fuel ratio right. The funny thing was, we never knew there was any problems with the car because it run perfect and super strong until he dyno to find out how much power it make and find out that his air fuel ratio was way high. All this **** i'm saying sound like I'm try to put negative on this ECU tuning. To be honest, it for your own good to dyno your car and be safe. I've been there and done that and tell people how fast my CL55 is with HPS Supercharger based on BUTT DYNO but when I finally dyno my CL 55, I made just 25 rwhp more (instead of 125 hp more)and air fuel ratio at WOT was in the 17.0:1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here's the link to the 68 pages debates when me and my friend (AMGSC) has our car Supercharger installed.................btw, my old screen name is "CLK&SLK". I decided to changed it to get away from that whole mess after we sued them.


https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...er-hps-sc.html


Nobody is bragging how fast their car is after this tune. Everybody that I know doing the tune has an NA engine. You're talking superchargers with all these mods. I have a 320, deleted cats, and drive about 500 miles a month and your talking to me about rebuilding my engine. Since you are always right, I will be preparing for my engine to explode.
Old 09-09-2010, 04:33 PM
  #80  
Senior Member
 
BadDebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 ML550 P2. 2010 E350 P2
Honestly, I see Klinh's point.
Old 09-09-2010, 05:13 PM
  #81  
Out Of Control!!
 
dynomite05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jerzy
Posts: 10,275
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
04 CLK 320 > CLK32K
Would be nice if Oliver was here to defend his Tune. All these assumptions on both ends...
Old 09-09-2010, 06:30 PM
  #82  
Banned
 
badblackbenz550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
benzo larenzo
yo this tune gave me MAD POWER LOOK!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ndxq4uTjWo4
Old 09-09-2010, 06:31 PM
  #83  
Super Member
 
Moedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'05 CLK55, '04 CLK320
Originally Posted by Klinh
They said that they can tuned based on what mods you have in your car but reality is, you CAN NOT tune it that way without having the car on the dyno and tune it live !!!!!! A mod like CAT deleted , AMG air box..etc, how do they know how much air is being suck in to provide enough fuel without running lean at WOT and enough timing that it won't cause detonation? I've been around the tuning shops and experienced with tuning for years on my cars and friend's cars and seen it all. Take my friend's C55 with Kleemann SC for example, all his mods are Kleemann and it take 3 ECU tuned from Kleemann just to get the air fuel ratio right. The funny thing was, we never knew there was any problems with the car because it run perfect and super strong until he dyno to find out how much power it make and find out that his air fuel ratio was way high. All this **** i'm saying sound like I'm try to put negative on this ECU tuning. To be honest, it for your own good to dyno your car and be safe. I've been there and done that and tell people how fast my CL55 is with HPS Supercharger based on BUTT DYNO but when I finally dyno my CL 55, I made just 25 rwhp more (instead of 125 hp more)and air fuel ratio at WOT was in the 17.0:1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Here's the link to the 68 pages debates when me and my friend (AMGSC) has our car Supercharger installed.................btw, my old screen name is "CLK&SLK". I decided to changed it to get away from that whole mess after we sued them.


https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...er-hps-sc.html
how did the lawsuit go? does your cl55 still have an hps supercharger and is your car running fine now?
Old 09-09-2010, 07:29 PM
  #84  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Klinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,632
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
C63s Cabriolet, BMW M4, Civic
Originally Posted by dynomite05
Would be nice if Oliver was here to defend his Tune. All these assumptions on both ends...

Never take the tuner words for it. The only safest way is dyno the car to find out yourself. I learned that lessons throught that whole messy. We were defending our tuner for 2 years but we were totally wrong after the dyno and in the end, the damages already weak the engine and blew it up.
Old 09-09-2010, 07:33 PM
  #85  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Klinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,632
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
C63s Cabriolet, BMW M4, Civic
Originally Posted by dynomite05
Nobody is bragging how fast their car is after this tune. Everybody that I know doing the tune has an NA engine. You're talking superchargers with all these mods. I have a 320, deleted cats, and drive about 500 miles a month and your talking to me about rebuilding my engine. Since you are always right, I will be preparing for my engine to explode.

You missed my points, what we think and feels doesn't mean much until you dyno it. In your case of getting better gas mileages could sacarfied a lean running engine. No way of knowing for sure until you dyno the car, is the only way to be safe. Specially your car is deleted the CAts. The CAT is there to filter/burn up all the unburn gas. Now that it not there, to clean up the unburn gas, the ECU gonna think that the engine is running richer then it really is and tell the ECU to reduce fuel which could cause it to run leaner.

Last edited by Klinh; 09-09-2010 at 07:55 PM.
Old 09-09-2010, 07:52 PM
  #86  
Out Of Control!!
 
dynomite05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jerzy
Posts: 10,275
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
04 CLK 320 > CLK32K
I see your point, it's the way you go about making it I don't understand
Old 09-09-2010, 08:24 PM
  #87  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Klinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,632
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
C63s Cabriolet, BMW M4, Civic
Originally Posted by dynomite05
I see your point, it's the way you go about making it I don't understand

My Engish is bad as you can see. It even harder trying to put it in words and that's where the confusion and the mis-understood started. Man, I would love to see any one of you guys with the ECU upgrade dyno with success results. I would jump on the bangwagon too.

Last edited by Klinh; 09-09-2010 at 08:59 PM.
Old 09-09-2010, 09:07 PM
  #88  
Senior Member
 
supacrazykev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLE 450 2021, SLK 350 2013, Honda Civc Type R 2019, Suzuki GSXR 750 2014, Ducati Diavel 2018
Originally Posted by badblackbenz550
yo this tune gave me MAD POWER LOOK!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ndxq4uTjWo4
OMG did your vtec kicked in? Sounds awesome LOLOL
Old 09-09-2010, 10:14 PM
  #89  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
user 76208202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK550
Originally Posted by dynomite05
Would be nice if Oliver was here to defend his Tune. All these assumptions on both ends...
Seriously. Is he even on this forum?


Originally Posted by Klinh
My Engish is bad as you can see. It even harder trying to put it in words and that's where the confusion and the mis-understood started. Man, I would love to see any one of you guys with the ECU upgrade dyno with success results. I would jump on the bangwagon too.

Me too! I'd love nothing more than to jump on the bandwagon and make my car faster, but untill i see a dyno i won't do that in fear of blowing my engine. I need my car to last through law-school and can't afford a $20,000 engine.
Old 09-09-2010, 10:16 PM
  #90  
Senior Member
 
BadDebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 ML550 P2. 2010 E350 P2
Originally Posted by Klinh
Never take the tuner words for it. The only safest way is dyno the car to find out yourself. I learned that lessons throught that whole messy. We were defending our tuner for 2 years but we were totally wrong after the dyno and in the end, the damages already weak the engine and blew it up.
Originally Posted by Klinh
My Engish is bad as you can see. It even harder trying to put it in words and that's where the confusion and the mis-understood started. Man, I would love to see any one of you guys with the ECU upgrade dyno with success results. I would jump on the bangwagon too.
This is why i sat on the sidelines from the start. It seems this performance mod has a lot of upside for the money, but I'd rather know the results are documented and this guy knows what the hell is doing. Not saying he doesn't but were not exactly dealing w/ vinshu here and we are talking about our engine's fuel to air ratio and programing.

Last edited by BadDebt; 09-09-2010 at 10:19 PM.
Old 09-09-2010, 10:25 PM
  #91  
Senior Member
 
BadDebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 ML550 P2. 2010 E350 P2
ahahaha we typing at the same time... great minds think alike.
Old 09-09-2010, 11:17 PM
  #92  
Banned
 
badblackbenz550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
benzo larenzo
ok so me and badblack550 ran stock for stock and we ware dead even, i had my tune for almost a week now and tonight we had a few runs 20-100. watch the video judge for your self.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXiGFGxhY3A

Last edited by badblackbenz550; 09-10-2010 at 12:07 AM.
Old 09-10-2010, 12:05 AM
  #93  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
dark knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 CLK500


ENOUGH WILL ALL THE NONSENSE ALREADY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !


You guys are wasting a lot of energy with the back and forth arguments.

I created this thread for people that got the tune to give their opinion, experience about the tune.

PLEASE keep it simple.
Old 09-10-2010, 12:51 AM
  #94  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Klinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,632
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
C63s Cabriolet, BMW M4, Civic
Originally Posted by badblackbenz550
ok so me and badblack550 ran stock for stock and we ware dead even, i had my tune for almost a week now and tonight we had a few runs 20-100. watch the video judge for your self.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXiGFGxhY3A


The first half of the video, look like you got a great jump on him. The second half of the video, when you pulled on him from behind and passed him, if you guys were still racing then your car is faster then stock. Did you beat him every single races you guys races tonight? Btw, did you even took it past 135 mph to check on the speed limiter?

Last edited by Klinh; 09-10-2010 at 12:54 AM.
Old 09-10-2010, 01:04 AM
  #95  
Banned
 
badblackbenz550's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
benzo larenzo
Originally Posted by Klinh
The first half of the video, look like you got a great jump on him. The second half of the video, when you pulled on him from behind and passed him, if you guys were still racing then your car is faster then stock. Did you beat him every single races you guys races tonight? Btw, did you even took it past 135 mph to check on the speed limiter?
every time he got the jump, in the 1st video you can hear his car rev up before mine, 2nd video we agreed i will give him ahead start and i still passed, we went all the way on. Regarding the limiter mine from stock was 155 so i didn't bother going past that to see if my limiter is out.
Old 09-10-2010, 01:41 AM
  #96  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
user 76208202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK550
Originally Posted by badblackbenz550
every time he got the jump, in the 1st video you can hear his car rev up before mine, 2nd video we agreed i will give him ahead start and i still passed, we went all the way on. Regarding the limiter mine from stock was 155 so i didn't bother going past that to see if my limiter is out.
Great videos! Now race a M3 so we know that Black550 wasn't sand baggin
Old 09-10-2010, 01:48 AM
  #97  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Klinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,632
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
C63s Cabriolet, BMW M4, Civic
Originally Posted by Amiricanmade
Great videos! Now race a M3 so we know that Black550 wasn't sand baggin

Hmmmm.......if both cars is stock, he's not sand baggin since the M3 is about half a second faster.
Old 09-10-2010, 01:50 AM
  #98  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
user 76208202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK550
Originally Posted by Klinh
Hmmmm.......if both cars is stock, he's not sand baggin since the M3 is about half a second faster.

I meant if 550 in the youtuve video was sandbaggin (doubt he was, i heard him step on it). Klinh, we need a dyno to see what the deal with this dyno is..so far it looks promising.
Old 09-10-2010, 02:14 AM
  #99  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Klinh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,632
Received 149 Likes on 123 Posts
C63s Cabriolet, BMW M4, Civic
Originally Posted by Amiricanmade
I meant if 550 in the youtuve video was sandbaggin (doubt he was, i heard him step on it). Klinh, we need a dyno to see what the deal with this dyno is..so far it looks promising.

When you do rolling start racing like that, if he a good racer, he should already be in manual mode and selected the right gears then just floor it. He engine sounded like he's in automatic mode then he just floor it and that's why you hear that engine roar to life when the kick down switch kick in. You're looking at like half a second lost reaction time for the tranny to do all that step.

Last edited by Klinh; 09-10-2010 at 02:16 AM.
Old 09-10-2010, 02:18 AM
  #100  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
user 76208202's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK550
Originally Posted by Klinh
When you do rolling start racing like that, if he a good racer, he should already be in manual mode and selected the right gears then just floor it. He engine sounded like he's in automatic mode then he just floor it and that's why you hear that engine roar to life when the kick down switch kick in. You're looking at like half a second lost reaction time for the tranny to do all that step.
Ya. Props to them for taking the time to post a video for us. I'm willing to donate $5 towards a dyno


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: SpeedTuning GB Evaluation.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 AM.