CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

2000 CLK with 139K

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-08-2022, 05:14 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
SuperMario72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 CLK
2000 CLK with 139K

Ok guys, I am going to look at a 2000 CLK with 139K on the clock. Looks pretty clean in the pics only problem noted is that the EC light comes on intermittently, which I think means likely has an AC problem. Are there any other common problems I should be looking for?

This car is just going to be a summer fun for my wife, not a daily. They are asking $5K, based on what I have seen this looks about right but would like some feedback there.

BTW I used to own a 2005 E320, bought it new and drove it for a few years but then moved mainly to SUV's.
Old 02-08-2022, 06:01 PM
  #2  
Member
 
zill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2008 CLK 550 2012 C300
Dear super,

skip it. Way too many miles. I don’t know your finances, my advice is to look for something with lower miles. At that age and miles things are worn: bushings, shocks, control arms, ball joints, top hydraulics, everything.

zill.
Old 02-09-2022, 09:42 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,506
Received 424 Likes on 350 Posts
MB’s
Run…. Too many miles. Not good enough for a daily and not fun enough for a weekend toy. The cabriolet tops are a pain in the a$$ to have and cost huge $$$ to fix when they break. Also a 2000 CLK is a W208 and that was not the best of the CLK’s. What is your budget? Even in this market CLK’s that are clean can be had for cheap. Spend about $13,000 and find a clean low mileage C209 Coupe. Put the windows down and sunroof and get the cabriolet feel without the nonsense and drama to go with it.
The following users liked this post:
Panama (02-10-2022)
Old 02-10-2022, 04:37 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Panama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 277
Received 115 Likes on 74 Posts
2017 SL450, 2017 Ford Expedition, 2007 CLK 550, 2019 Buick Enclave
You cannot begin to compare a hardtop with the windows down to a Cabriolet.... LOL...
Also, I agree about too many miles and years to suit me. If you do decide to do it, go to a good independent mechanic and get him to go over it top to bottom. Some of the costly things might have already been done. If you don't have a good independent tech, don't buy it.
Old 02-10-2022, 09:05 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,506
Received 424 Likes on 350 Posts
MB’s
Originally Posted by Panama
You cannot begin to compare a hardtop with the windows down to a Cabriolet.... LOL...
Also, I agree about too many miles and years to suit me. If you do decide to do it, go to a good independent mechanic and get him to go over it top to bottom. Some of the costly things might have already been done. If you don't have a good independent tech, don't buy it.

Having owned both at the same time I will tell you for what you deal with it just is not worth it. The lack of solidity, cowl shake and soft top issue are just not worth the trouble.
Old 02-11-2022, 02:34 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
nkx1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 322
Received 52 Likes on 44 Posts
2010 E550 Coupe
There's no way I would consider a convertible with 139K miles. That thing will almost certainly nickel and dime you to death if you try to take care of it properly, unless you have the time and skill to work on your own car. But who wants to spend a bunch of time doing that anyway!?

Last edited by nkx1; 12-26-2023 at 01:14 AM.
Old 02-12-2022, 11:40 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C280 Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saratoga Springs, New York & Sarasota, Florida.
Posts: 3,506
Received 424 Likes on 350 Posts
MB’s
Originally Posted by nkx1
In all honesty, the coupe isn't worth the trouble either. Mine only has 83K or so miles, and it's already had many thousands of dollars of work done (with more to go). When I bought it, I knew it would be a little more maintenance-intensive than a Toyota (it shouldn't be, but it is). But keeping on top of everything just gets old- there are many things I'd rather be doing than driving to the mechanic and trying to keep track of what needs to be done. Now I barely drive it and just drive my wife's car (since we both work from home). I honestly can't wait to get rid of it once car prices come down a bit.

There's no way I would consider a convertible with 139K miles. That thing will almost certainly nickel and dime you to death if you try to take care of it properly, unless you have the time and skill to work on your own car. But who wants to spend a bunch of time doing that anyway!?

Cannot say the same about my 2009 CLK and 2005 CLK55 AMG Coupe. Both have been very trouble free.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2000 CLK with 139K



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.