CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) 2000 - 2010 (Two Generations)

2003 clk55 vs. 2008 clk550

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-10-2007, 04:33 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
CZ55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
M156
2003 clk55 vs. 2008 clk550

Which one is faster?
Old 11-10-2007, 07:09 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ausmbtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
190D 2.5 (x2), 190E 2.6, W202 C240,W202 C43 (C55), W210 E55, W212 E250CDI
CLK550, just as much torque with a flatter torque curve, a little more HP and a much better gearbox in terms of acceleration and response.
Old 11-10-2007, 12:31 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OPALW208's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, C63
Originally Posted by Ausmbtech
CLK550, just as much torque with a flatter torque curve, a little more HP and a much better gearbox in terms of acceleration and response.

i don't know about that one......I have a W208 CLK55, and the new CLK550's can not beat me.
Old 11-15-2007, 03:32 PM
  #4  
Member
 
hong1dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MTA
Originally Posted by OPALW208
i don't know about that one......I have a W208 CLK55, and the new CLK550's can not beat me.
i think a clk550 will beat you
Old 11-15-2007, 03:50 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OPALW208's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, C63
Originally Posted by hong1dan
i think a clk550 will beat you
you think incorrectly on this one! i've beaten BOTH ones that tried to race me.
Old 11-15-2007, 08:37 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
AndyAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OC
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MB & BMW
I took out a CLK550 easily in my 04' CLK55.
Old 11-15-2007, 11:27 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
DBLNICKL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK 55
i've beat one out as well...i think the AMG may be a liiiittle bit quicker than the 550...i've been contemplating a 550 next, but i'd definitely miss the F1 shifting/M mode if i did...i guess i'd broaden the possibility of gettin slapped by an AMG as well...hahaa
Old 11-15-2007, 11:51 PM
  #8  
Member
 
brabusw209amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1 V10, 2 V8
amg is a tad quicker due to it being AMG. i am not kidding. there's those programs, tune, transmission, etc etc. I'd rather get a CLK55 than a CLK550 for the AMG package honestly. I wouldnt buy a CLK63. I would rather kleemann the 55. Makes it a little more fun. But then, why not get a BMW 135 when it comes out and transform it into a crazy machine?? But then why not a Lotus Exige S. Next summer, I am still debating on either an Exige S or a 135....I am going way off topic
Old 11-17-2007, 04:20 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
iguess's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CLK350
Originally Posted by brabusw209amg
amg is a tad quicker due to it being AMG. i am not kidding. there's those programs, tune, transmission, etc etc. I'd rather get a CLK55 than a CLK550 for the AMG package honestly. I wouldnt buy a CLK63. I would rather kleemann the 55. Makes it a little more fun. But then, why not get a BMW 135 when it comes out and transform it into a crazy machine?? But then why not a Lotus Exige S. Next summer, I am still debating on either an Exige S or a 135....I am going way off topic
I'm sure a 135 is probally faster than your CLK55, but the car is 1/2 the size. Are you willing to sacrifice that much room? I think you should look into a 335i instead.
Old 11-19-2007, 04:37 PM
  #10  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by brabusw209amg
But then, why not get a BMW 135 when it comes out and transform it into a crazy machine??
Because its ugly as sin!
Old 11-19-2007, 04:47 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
OPALW208's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Bay
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SL55, C63
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
Because its ugly as sin!
+1. It's not ALL about being quick....looks do matter
Old 11-21-2007, 02:08 AM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
blazinginder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
AlabasterWhiteSL ObsidianBlackML
Originally Posted by iguess
I'm sure a 135 is probally faster than your CLK55, but the car is 1/2 the size. Are you willing to sacrifice that much room? I think you should look into a 335[x]i instead.
+1
Old 11-21-2007, 06:12 PM
  #13  
Super Member
 
AMGOODNESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
03 CLK 55 AMG, IMCO muffler/Magnaflow tips, KW V1 coilovers, 19" Petrol Metrix Wheels
i think the new i135's will look good. the car may end up being small but it will be like have a brand new BMW 2002 but with 300hp/300tq
Old 11-22-2007, 12:22 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
iguess's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 CLK350
i honestly think the 3 series is borderline small. i mean its not bad but there isnt too much room in the back. the 1 series would be hell, unless the back passengers dont mind sitting with your knees pressed against the front seats. you should definitely look into a 335i or xi instead. its a GREAT car, 1/2 the price of a CLK63. sure the interior is ugly, but if you can live with that, then time for your new 3 series
Old 12-11-2007, 05:11 PM
  #15  
Member
 
hong1dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MTA
Originally Posted by iguess
I'm sure a 135 is probally faster than your CLK55, but the car is 1/2 the size. Are you willing to sacrifice that much room? I think you should look into a 335i instead.
335i and 135i have VERY similar dimensions
Old 06-09-2012, 02:51 AM
  #16  
Member
 
robusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: From NYC now in Hong Kong
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shopping for: CLK500or CLK55 or SL55 or SL500 or C43
more than just HP/torque

perhaps the reason a w209 CLK55 AMG is faster has more than to do about just HP/Torq.

im sure AMG has put many adjustments throughout the car to make it perform a lot better than its hp/torq state.

my question is how the CLK550 brakes compare the w209 CLK55?
Old 06-09-2012, 07:03 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
betrezra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,589
Received 68 Likes on 44 Posts
C63 507 AMG DA Car #19
Could be driver too.

Watch out a few of those 550's have the colorful wood interiors and white interiors which may not be your taste.

Also mods are limited for the 550's....... no blower that I know of.
Old 06-09-2012, 07:50 AM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kevwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: A Canadian in Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'05 C200K SS, '05 Kleemann CLK500K, '08 Hummer H3 & '92 Z34 5sp (track car in Canada)
Holy blast from the past Batman!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2007
Old 06-10-2012, 03:17 AM
  #19  
Member
 
robusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: From NYC now in Hong Kong
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shopping for: CLK500or CLK55 or SL55 or SL500 or C43
:)

im glad to have opened up an old thread!

(full disclosure, im in the market for a CLK55 or CLK550 or C55 or maybe C43)

I think it makes sense for a w209 CLK55 to be slightly faster than a CLK550 which is not designed to be a hi performance car
Old 06-11-2012, 11:07 AM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by iguess
I'm sure a 135 is probally faster than your CLK55,
I know the N55 powered ones are not faster. My friend's stock was trapping 104, after JB4 on map 2 he was trapping 106-107, I was trapping 108-109.
Old 06-11-2012, 10:47 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
Eric299's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMW
i've beat one out as well...i think the AMG may be a liiiittle bit quicker than the 550...i've been contemplating a 550 next, but i'd definitely miss the F1 shifting/M mode if i did...i guess i'd broaden the possibility of gettin slapped by an AMG as well...hahaa __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2003 clk55 vs. 2008 clk550



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07 PM.