W208 guys- For anyone that has driven both a 55 and a 430
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 6.1 14.5
2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG 5.0 13.6
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
I'm having a hard time seeing where a full second can be gained in what seems to be not exactly a huge HP boost. So, I figured I'd ask right where someone would know....... the owners. Anyone that has driven both will be able to honestly answer this question.
Hell, either way they are both faster than a Ferrari Testarossa.
1989 Ferrari Testarossa 6.2 14.2
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Na, but seriously.... with just this small amount of HP added, the 55 really pulls a full second harder? God that is just absolutely huge. I don't think people realize what it takes to move the same car 1 full second faster.
Just make sure you get an extended warranty if possible on either of them, or at the very least have it thoroughly checked out prior to purchase.
Trending Topics
If a 55 launched in winter mode, and got a door length lead, before I could think "I'm in front", I'd be looking at tail lights - AND I CHEAT!!
OK, maybe I'm exaggerating a little, but not by much. And if it's Blackbenzz's car forget about that one second stuff. He'll spot a 430 two car lengths and be past it before the 430's traction control light goes off.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
If a 55 launched in winter mode, and got a door length lead, before I could think "I'm in front", I'd be looking at tail lights - AND I CHEAT!!
OK, maybe I'm exaggerating a little, but not by much. And if it's Blackbenzz's car forget about that one second stuff. He'll spot a 430 two car lengths and be past it before the 430's traction control light goes off.
I'm having a hard time seeing where a full second can be gained in what seems to be not exactly a huge HP boost. So, I figured I'd ask right where someone would know....... the owners. Anyone that has driven both will be able to honestly answer this question.
Na, but seriously.... with just this small amount of HP added, the 55 really pulls a full second harder? God that is just absolutely huge. I don't think people realize what it takes to move the same car 1 full second faster.
You're focusing on just HP.....don't forget the torque!
and yes....the 55 is a beast.
I've been holding out for the right one though. I'm partial to my car, I like it the way it is. The silver/black is the way to go for me. I won't even notice a difference looking out in the driveway since they both have the AMG appearance package and just a slight thickness in wheel spokes.
Gotta find the right service records and tie it into the right price, then I'll be set. 
So, anyone race any Testarossa's lately?
(LOL). Looking forward to my purchase.
The 55 right now is worth every penny, especially when some people are selling theirs in the $12K-$15K price range =)
The 55 right now is worth every penny, especially when some people are selling theirs in the $12K-$15K price range =)
I'm picky.
When I find one like that, silver exterior, all service records, and the right price, I'm in

1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK430 6.1 14.5
2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG 5.0 13.6
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
I'm having a hard time seeing where a full second can be gained in what seems to be not exactly a huge HP boost. So, I figured I'd ask right where someone would know....... the owners. Anyone that has driven both will be able to honestly answer this question.
Hell, either way they are both faster than a Ferrari Testarossa.
1989 Ferrari Testarossa 6.2 14.2
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Na, but seriously.... with just this small amount of HP added, the 55 really pulls a full second harder? God that is just absolutely huge. I don't think people realize what it takes to move the same car 1 full second faster.

Here's a test ride.

http://s197.photobucket.com/player.s...fs=1&os=1&ap=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alk0h-_9ul8
And although I own a W209 now, I still think the W208 looks better.
The 55 right now is worth every penny, especially when some people are selling theirs in the $12K-$15K price range =)
Current 2004 W209 CLK55 AMG. More of everything. Power and transmission are much improved. W209 handles better because of the 40% stiffer chassis and improved AMG suspension and true rack & pinion steering vs. the old ball and track in the W208.
Lookswise, they both looked great in their own right at different angles. I like the W209.









