CLK55 AMG, CLK63 AMG (W208, W209) 2000 - 2010 (Two Generations)

Is W211 CLK55 faster than m3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-12-2004, 12:11 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
VelocitE55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Encino
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'06 CLS55 AMG
[QUOTE= I drive an M3 and work for MB and am very informed and am an enthusiast of both companys. You would be suprised how much BMW enthusiasts know about Merc and vice versa.


Can you speak for all BMW drivers? You are very much more informed only because you own a BMW and work for MB. That doesnt mean that BMW owners all the sudden know a lot about MB.
Old 09-12-2004, 06:11 PM
  #27  
Member
 
coloboardin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
96 ///M3
[QUOTE=VelocitE55][QUOTE= I drive an M3 and work for MB and am very informed and am an enthusiast of both companys. You would be suprised how much BMW enthusiasts know about Merc and vice versa.


Can you speak for all BMW drivers? You are very much more informed only because you own a BMW and work for MB. That doesnt mean that BMW owners all the sudden know a lot about MB.[/QUOTE]

I can't speak for all of them but I can speak for most of them my age around here, just don't throw the steriotype out like that.
Old 09-27-2004, 12:55 PM
  #28  
Member
 
zkagan818's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
clk 430
Clk is not for the track. Car is not balanced at all, will be very hard to drive. The M3 will smoke the **** out of it. Apples and Oranges. M3 is basically for the track and clk is for freeway.
Old 09-27-2004, 06:24 PM
  #29  
Member
 
AMIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF VALLEY
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK55
[QUOTE=VelocitE55][QUOTE= I drive an M3 and work for MB and am very informed and am an enthusiast of both companys. You would be suprised how much BMW enthusiasts know about Merc and vice versa.


Can you speak for all BMW drivers? You are very much more informed only because you own a BMW and work for MB. That doesnt mean that BMW owners all the sudden know a lot about MB.[/QUOTE]

im a AMG owner comming from a BMW....my mercedes sucks and i'll never get one again till im @ least 50....
Old 09-27-2004, 07:40 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by AMIL
im a AMG owner comming from a BMW....my mercedes sucks and i'll never get one again till im @ least 50....
What's wrong with your CLK?
Old 09-28-2004, 06:34 AM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ahmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,553
Received 161 Likes on 130 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
Originally Posted by AMIL
im a AMG owner comming from a BMW....my mercedes sucks and i'll never get one again till im @ least 50....
interesting statement!
Old 09-29-2004, 01:15 PM
  #32  
Member
 
AMIL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF VALLEY
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK55
Originally Posted by Stiggs
What's wrong with your CLK?
other then the fact that i just got it and its a lemon, I cant trust it on the twisties of a canyon...
bmw sucks too, thats why im getting a porsche
Old 09-30-2004, 02:48 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55 RUSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 2,596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E55K
M3 is very capable handler especially with 19's...it wont have any probs keeping up with a Porsche 996 C2 or C4...
Old 09-30-2004, 07:42 AM
  #34  
H50
Almost a Member!
 
H50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BMWM3 BMWM5 E55
to sum it up

am an amg fan and bmw fan..

a week a go i raced a w209 clk55 ... on the highway they are dead equal same pace... on next traffic using launch control i was in front half a car length...and stayed the same .. the performance of both car is the same ,,,

but on track i think the m3 is much better from the suspension settings and the smg
Old 09-30-2004, 09:50 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
reggid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: .
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.
Originally Posted by Henrik
I can't recall any time at all when MB was slower than a comparable BMW.. In the 90's? no... 80's? no... 70?.. no.. and before that? No..

But it's a common thought amongst many BMW owners that their cars are faster than anything else. Just because they do not know anything about Merc.. sadly. They don't even bother reading about them because they think it's an old mans car and it can't be fast anyway.
yeah, right what world are you living in

One thing both bmw and mb fans have in common we don't like blatant BS
Old 10-11-2004, 01:07 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ahmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,553
Received 161 Likes on 130 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
I have never owned a BMW that didnt break down!

I had my CLK320 for a glorious 150,000 kms and absolutely no problems!
Old 10-11-2004, 08:55 PM
  #37  
Member
 
coloboardin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
96 ///M3
Originally Posted by AMIL
other then the fact that i just got it and its a lemon, I cant trust it on the twisties of a canyon...
bmw sucks too, thats why im getting a porsche
other than your statement of bmw's, good call on the porsche! someday I will upgrade to one also.
Old 10-12-2004, 01:44 AM
  #38  
Newbie
 
ImGettinA55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 BMW M3 convertible
Exclamation I own a 2003 M3, and test drove a CLK 55 today

I own a 2003 M3, and test drove a 2004 CLK 55 today, The CLK55 is hot, but you really dont feel the low end acceleration, but the midrange torque is hot, like from 50mph on up, but my M3 is fast, in low range, mid and high, the CLK55 is only good mid & high, I think my M3 is much faster and its a convertible.
Old 10-12-2004, 04:24 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
MikeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: LA
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uber 202
In a drag race, SMG is slower than a standard 6 speed. US spec cars only allow the car to launch at 1800 rpms. The optimum launch rpm for the S54 is about 4-5000 rpm. In a drag race or red light to red light, with a 6 speed and a good driver, the M3 coupe (Cabs are pigs) will win hands down. (you really have to know what you are doing to get ahead, get limited wheel spin, perfeft launch etc) Im not talking bus lengths, but it will win. From a stop to 1/4 mile the M3 will edge the MB's 5.5L out. From a fwy roll, lets say anything from 70-80+ to top speed, the M3 will only see the CLK's rear end. It's amazing on how hard the CLK55 pulls away from the S54 at higher fwy speeds. I have tested this time and time again. If you choke on the launch, the CLK will win. (you must dump the clutch at 4K rpm to win) If I nail it and dont mind abusing the clutch/drivetrain a little bit, all the MB sees is the ///M's quad tips.
Old 10-13-2004, 11:27 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Frank Wiesmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
[QUOTE=Chappy]Ditto.

MB never made a MY 2000 (W208) CLK55

Maybe he was referring to Europe, where the W208 CLK 55 AMG was sold from 1999.
Old 10-13-2004, 12:36 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Ahmed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,553
Received 161 Likes on 130 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
[QUOTE=Frank Wiesmann]
Originally Posted by Chappy
Ditto.

MB never made a MY 2000 (W208) CLK55

Maybe he was referring to Europe, where the W208 CLK 55 AMG was sold from 1999.
even in europe, W208 CLK55's were sold in from september 1999 as model year 2000 cars!
Old 10-13-2004, 01:40 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MiamiAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Magic City
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by coloboardin
And not to start a huge controversy (not ******* on MB) but in the late 80s early 90s what MB is comparable to the e30 M3?


Mercedes-Benz AMG 190E 2.5-16 Evolution II

Last edited by MiamiAMG; 10-13-2004 at 01:44 PM.
Old 10-13-2004, 05:26 PM
  #43  
ZAF
Almost a Member!
 
ZAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Volvo S40
So bottom line,
E46 M3 6 MT Vs CLK55 (w209):
If drag, M3 wins till 1/4mile then the CLK equals and passes...
If on the high way CLk55 wins any way...
E46 SMG Vs CLK55 (w209)
CLK wins any way!!

Is that the final situation?
Old 10-13-2004, 09:12 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
MikeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: LA
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uber 202
Originally Posted by ZAF
So bottom line,
E46 M3 6 MT Vs CLK55 (w209):
If drag, M3 wins till 1/4mile then the CLK equals and passes...
If on the high way CLk55 wins any way...
E46 SMG Vs CLK55 (w209)
CLK wins any way!!

Is that the final situation?
Put them on a race track or AutoX, and the M3 will hand the CLK its ***
Old 10-14-2004, 07:05 AM
  #45  
ZAF
Almost a Member!
 
ZAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Volvo S40
Originally Posted by MikeL
Put them on a race track or AutoX, and the M3 will hand the CLK its ***
What does S54 mean? Is that the name of the engine or what?
Old 10-14-2004, 02:54 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
MikeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: LA
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uber 202
Originally Posted by ZAF
What does S54 mean? Is that the name of the engine or what?
Correct, S54 is the engine code for the 333HP E46 M3 3.2L motor. All ///M motors start with a S, BMW's regular motors start with a M. For examples the 330's 3.0L motor is called M54.

Last edited by MikeL; 10-14-2004 at 02:56 PM.
Old 10-14-2004, 04:48 PM
  #47  
Super Member
 
JLee81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
04 CLK55, IWC CLS55 AMG(one of 55), 07 Honda CR-V 4WD
0-60 not really true if CLK has light forged wheel with 19's with low profile tires. I am consistantly getting 4.83-5 with my W209 CLK55 with the setting I mentioned above. CLK drivers need to know how to dirve without wheel spin tho then it's no match.
Old 10-14-2004, 07:38 PM
  #48  
ZAF
Almost a Member!
 
ZAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Volvo S40
Originally Posted by JLee81
0-60 not really true if CLK has light forged wheel with 19's with low profile tires. I am consistantly getting 4.83-5 with my W209 CLK55 with the setting I mentioned above. CLK drivers need to know how to dirve without wheel spin tho then it's no match.
Ok if both were doing 60-70mph and both floored it who is faster?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Is W211 CLK55 faster than m3?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.