CLK63 Black Series Forum & Registry Information and discussion on the W209 CLK63 AMG Black Series and Registry for all owners.

CLK63 Black Series transmission shifting compared to E63 AMG..how different are they?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-26-2012, 09:15 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Meeyatch1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,527
Received 139 Likes on 51 Posts
'94 NSX,'99 NSX Z,'12 C63 Black Series (Prior: '07 E63, '08 CLK63 Black Series,'14 E63-S & 16 C63-S)
CLK63 Black Series transmission shifting compared to E63 AMG..how different are they?

I have an '07 E63 AMG, and have been going back and forth on what my next car will be. The heard is narrowed down to the 911 Twin Turbo, 911 GT3 or GT3 RS, and the CLK63 Black Series. One of my main concerns when considering the CLK63 Black Series is that I hate the lag in the paddle shifting of my E63 AMG, and would not want to have that in my next car choice.

So, who here has driven both aggressively and can give some firsthand feedback on how much of a difference there is between the two, if any?
Old 02-26-2012, 09:22 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montana/Alberta
Posts: 1,669
Received 62 Likes on 43 Posts
C63 BS, GLA45
The shifting is nearly identical between the 2 cars. I taught my boss to drive at the track in his '07 E63, so I've spent a lot of time with both cars. M mode is pretty much used just on the streets. At the track, it's S mode.
Old 02-26-2012, 09:27 PM
  #3  
Member
 
bmstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
clk63 black series
Originally Posted by Meeyatch1
I have an '07 E63 AMG, and have been going back and forth on what my next car will be. The heard is narrowed down to the 911 Twin Turbo, 911 GT3 or GT3 RS, and the CLK63 Black Series. One of my main concerns when considering the CLK63 Black Series is that I hate the lag in the paddle shifting of my E63 AMG, and would not want to have that in my next car choice.

So, who here has driven both aggressively and can give some firsthand feedback on how much of a difference there is between the two, if any?
Sounds like your priority is performance in which case perhaps the black might not be the best of choices in comparison with the other choices.

Don't get me wrong, the black ain't no slouch but (to me) I feel it is more desirable due to it's rarity.

On that note, you can't go wrong with the 911 turbo or the GT3 RS.

Good luck
Old 02-27-2012, 12:11 PM
  #4  
SMP
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,067
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
CLK63 Black Series
There is a slight difference in transmissions (mechanically and electronically) between the CLK and the E automatic transmission. The CLK shifts a touch quicker and harsher. Especially noticeable on downshifts.

Depends which model Porsche you consider. 996 TT's and 997.1 TT's have automatic transmissions, which are Mercedes Benz supplied 5 speeds with Porsche software. If you are concerned with "shift lag", they're the same as the CLK and the E. 997.2 TT's have PDK, currently the quickest and most efficient transmissions on the market. Shifts are instantaneous and have no loss in tractive torque between shifts. When "race start" is selected, it feels like being shot out of a rifle. GT3's and GT3 RS's only come in a 6 speed manual ... you're left foot and right hand determine how quick they shift . Major difference between a GT3 and a GT3 RS is the difference in flywheels and clutches ... which makes the RS less practical in stop and go traffic.
Old 02-27-2012, 08:01 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
alexander stemer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CLK 63 AMG Black
I'll grant the the BS paddle response is not instantaneous. But, shifting only matters on the track, and there the S setting is excellent. I have a 996ttX50, and prefer the BS in all conditions except snow. The 997tt with pdk is quicker, but it has a funny way of channeling road and tire noise into the car, so is not a great distance car. I'm hoping the new 991 will be better, but have yet to try that. Good luck with your choice. AS
Old 02-27-2012, 10:37 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
ari1856's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
911 Turbo
I own an 02 996 Turbo that's pretty modded. Bilstein suspension, etc.. it's very smooth with limitless torque and fast as hell. Even on the freeway in 6th passing cars is a few seconds affair. 650HP on pump and 700 on race gas. It also out-handles most cars by a good margin.

I also have extended seat time in my father in law's 997 GT3. The GT cars are razor sharp in handling. Truly as close to a race car on the street as is feasible. But they have buckboard rides straight off the showroom floor. Press the stiff suspension setting and it's cement truck stiff. Definitely not everyone's cup of tea and not a daily driver for 99% of people. They are very rewarding to drive hard but you have to really work to wring out the most out of them (except the turbo GT cars, basically the GT2).

I think if you're thinking about a Mercedes, 911 turbo or GTx, you will be happy with a turbo. It's designed to be more comfortable. From the suspension to the engine mounts.

Last edited by ari1856; 02-28-2012 at 01:14 AM.
Old 02-27-2012, 10:43 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
jenk12m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: georgia
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clk Black Series
will you taking this new car to the track at all?
Old 02-28-2012, 10:47 PM
  #8  
Member
 
forhamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Public Transportation
The black is one of the few cars I miss. I've owned numerous turbos. Track days in the bs are unforgettable. Perfect car.
Old 02-29-2012, 01:01 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Meeyatch1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,527
Received 139 Likes on 51 Posts
'94 NSX,'99 NSX Z,'12 C63 Black Series (Prior: '07 E63, '08 CLK63 Black Series,'14 E63-S & 16 C63-S)
Originally Posted by jenk12m
will you taking this new car to the track at all?
Absolutley. I currently daily drive an NSX that does double duty as a track car for me to. Part of the reason I am looking at the cars above is because I think they would be more track oriented. Quite honestly, I do not mind the ride being firm, I want a car that is responsive to driver inputs.

It appears you have (2) of the cars I am looking into. Well done!
Old 02-29-2012, 03:19 PM
  #10  
Newbie
 
JAG1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK63 AMG Black Series
I have the BS with headers, high flow throttle bodies, Evo brakes, ECU flash, Evo diff, 2001 BMW Z8 with similar set up, had 997 08 Turbo (too soft), 1955 AH 100/4(cool, fun, slow), 2004 GT3 with full track set up (for sale) and now 2004 996 GT3 Cup car which is amazing on tracks like Daytona, Sebring, Roebleing Road, PRIR etc. Without a doubt the GT3 RS is the best track car of the lot, total connection with the car and track and incredibly fast in the twists with a set of track wheels and Michelin slicks.

My BS is a beast and very fast and fun on the street, gets A LOT of attention, but not a real good track car.

Just my opinion and experience. Hope this helps.
Old 02-29-2012, 04:10 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG BRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK63 Black Series
Jag1111, where are you located?
Old 02-29-2012, 04:23 PM
  #12  
Newbie
 
JAG1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK63 AMG Black Series
Ponte Vedra Beach, between Jacksonville and St. Augustine. Chris Chapas at C2Design did all of my work on the car including some minor exterior mods as well. Really good guy and fine shop in your area. You probably know him as well.
Old 03-01-2012, 12:07 AM
  #13  
Member
 
forhamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Public Transportation
Originally Posted by JAG1111
gets A LOT of attention, but not a real good track car.
I've had the opposite experience in both areas. The bs almost disappears in traffic and is at home on the dance floor. So much fun on the track.
Old 03-01-2012, 12:21 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG BRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK63 Black Series
I also use Chris at C2 Design. Best shop, and awesome guy to deal with.

Last edited by AMG BRED; 03-01-2012 at 12:21 PM. Reason: typo
Old 03-03-2012, 02:38 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Meeyatch1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,527
Received 139 Likes on 51 Posts
'94 NSX,'99 NSX Z,'12 C63 Black Series (Prior: '07 E63, '08 CLK63 Black Series,'14 E63-S & 16 C63-S)
Originally Posted by JAG1111
I have the BS with headers, high flow throttle bodies, Evo brakes, ECU flash, Evo diff, 2001 BMW Z8 with similar set up, had 997 08 Turbo (too soft), 1955 AH 100/4(cool, fun, slow), 2004 GT3 with full track set up (for sale) and now 2004 996 GT3 Cup car which is amazing on tracks like Daytona, Sebring, Roebleing Road, PRIR etc. Without a doubt the GT3 RS is the best track car of the lot, total connection with the car and track and incredibly fast in the twists with a set of track wheels and Michelin slicks.

My BS is a beast and very fast and fun on the street, gets A LOT of attention, but not a real good track car.

Just my opinion and experience. Hope this helps.
Thank you. Yes, that kind of first hand experience does help.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLK63 Black Series transmission shifting compared to E63 AMG..how different are they?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.