C218 CLS63, 2011 - 2019

Results of the Vtech tune on my 2012 CLS 63 WOW!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Results of the Vtech tune on my 2012 CLS 63 WOW!!!

I can't tell you how happy I am with this tune. The car is an entirely different animal. We base lined my car at 516 HP/559 tq bone stock. In fact, I drove the car straight from the dealer and put it on the dyno

The day after getting the base line numbers I had the ECU tuned. I enjoyed the car thru the holiday weekend and brought it back to the dyno today so I could measure the gains. To my surprise it laid down 595 HP to the wheels Torque jumped thru the roof to 643.9

So we are looking at a gain of 80 HP to the wheels and 85 lb ft of torque to the wheels. Freaking amazing!!!

Anyone know how much power loss thru the drive train? I see some tuners saying 17%, but I think that's an inflated number to possibly make their tunes look better? If we figure on a modest 12 % power loss thru the drive train then my dyno numbers would translate into roughly 666 crank HP and 720 lb ft of torque. We all know dyno's can vary so I wouldn't say these are exact numbers, but my base line numbers on the same dyno definitely show the gains.

Here's a dyno chart for you guys



Here's cool little video the Vtech guys put together with some pics/videos I sent them of my car. Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6z_S...1&feature=plcp

The best part of the tune is it was only $2000
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 05:41 PM
  #2  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
I forgot to mention... my local track is closed until January 4th, but I will be there on that date, weather providing, to get some numbers on how well it goes down the track
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 07:29 PM
  #3  
BenzoBoi's Avatar
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
W221
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 07:44 PM
  #4  
hyperion667's Avatar
MBWorld God!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 31,273
Likes: 3,916
From: on my way
2012 CLS63
is right!
hope it holds up!
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 08:42 PM
  #5  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by hyperion667
is right!
hope it holds up!
There's no doubt in my mind that it will. I didn't blindly have this tune loaded to my 125k car. We carefully checked air fuel ratios throughout the RPM range and also for any spark retard (detonation). there was none

Despite the power levels, this is a very safe and reliable tune. In fact, it's quite a modest tune. There's plenty of room for more performance if someone was willing to push the limits

From what I'm told this is the same tune sold by other vendors only this one is thousands less.

Last edited by Ready2roll; Dec 27, 2011 at 08:44 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 10:25 PM
  #6  
805Benz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: California
C2S CAB & C6Z06 & CLS63
So how does the 643 lb of torque feel?
How does the drive differ from stock? Are the wheels breaking at different gears vs stock?

Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #7  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by 805Benz
So how does the 643 lb of torque feel?
How does the drive differ from stock? Are the wheels breaking at different gears vs stock?

It feels incredible! This car is already a beast stock, but with the tune it kicks it up to a whole different level. The car is still very civil and drives like stock until you get into the peddle and the thing just roars to life. With traction control on you can definitely feel torque management kicking in to limit wheel spin in the lower speeds. I'll try to get a video of the car accelerating from a dead stop for you guys soon. It's a beast!
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
Ali_E55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 13
From: Abu Dhabi
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
the power loss on our CLS63 TT is about 9.5% as German MB tech says.

congrats on the gains my friend.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 27, 2011 | 11:15 PM
  #9  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by Ali_E55
the power loss on our CLS63 TT is about 9.5% as German MB tech says.

congrats on the gains my friend.
Thank you Ali!

Excellent info on the power train loss, thank you for sharing! It seems these 7 speed transmissions are very efficient
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 03:16 PM
  #10  
Nachtsturm's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
From: Chicago
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Impressive, get a retune with some breathing mods to break that 600whp mark, lol.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 03:40 PM
  #11  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by Nachtsturm
Impressive, get a retune with some breathing mods to break that 600whp mark, lol.
I said I was going to leave the car alone after the tune, but that doesn't sound like a bad idea

Are there any breathing mods/air intake mods for these cars?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 03:50 PM
  #12  
Nachtsturm's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
From: Chicago
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
I said I was going to leave the car alone after the tune, but that doesn't sound like a bad idea

Are there any breathing mods/air intake mods for these cars?
Not yet that I know of. Couldn't even find a drop in for it.

Are there charcoal filters you can remove? I know that helps out the C63 guys.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #13  
griza's Avatar
Super Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 501
Likes: 92
From: Miami Beach
2006 CLS55 AMG Sold 2010 E550 Coupe totaled by mechanic, '13 SL550 I totaled it, 2017 SL63 current
How much boost are you pushing? What is stock boost?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 09:36 PM
  #14  
Vic55's Avatar
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador

20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 12,263
Likes: 901
From: THE Orange County, California
2024 C8 Z06- 2025 BMW CS- 2022 Porsche 992 GTS
Nice over all numbers!!! Nice gains over the curve after certain RPMs.


Not sure why anybody else didnt ask this or everyone is focused on peak numbers but did you notice that that stock tune is stronger in TQ and HP at lower RPM's? The modified tune doesnt start its gain (and its a strong one) until after 3500 rpms.

Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 09:58 PM
  #15  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by griza
How much boost are you pushing? What is stock boost?
That's a good question griza. I don't have a boost gauge on the car and I didn't get that info from the guy running the dyno. From what I've heard the PP cars have 18.8 psi and the non PP cars are running 14.4 psi
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 10:02 PM
  #16  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by Vic55

Not sure why anybody else didnt ask this or everyone is focused on peak numbers but did you notice that that stock tune is stronger in TQ and HP at lower RPM's? The modified tune doesnt start its gain (and its a strong one) until after 3500 rpms.
Well, that's not exactly true. If you look at the chart the base line dyno reading started capturing at 2500 RPM whereas the tuned dyno run started at 3000. This gives the illusion that the stock tune may be stronger than the tuned version in the lower RPM ranges. If you move the Orange lines over to the start of the blue lines you can see the gains in the lower RPM's.

I assure you the "seat of my pants dyno" feels very strong gains right off idle

Last edited by Ready2roll; Dec 28, 2011 at 10:08 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 10:47 AM
  #17  
TMC M5's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 53
From: Maryland
'14 E63S & '14 Audi SQ5
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
Well, that's not exactly true. If you look at the chart the base line dyno reading started capturing at 2500 RPM whereas the tuned dyno run started at 3000. This gives the illusion that the stock tune may be stronger than the tuned version in the lower RPM ranges. If you move the Orange lines over to the start of the blue lines you can see the gains in the lower RPM's.

I assure you the "seat of my pants dyno" feels very strong gains right off idle
I still see some power loss at say 3,250RPM. At that RPM the baseline is showing 330-340hp and the tuned run is showing around 290hp. The difference may just be how the dyno operator got into the throttle on the two runs.

Getting back to your original point about parasitic loss...it all depends on the type of dyno. What type of dyno was it? Were the #'s corrected? Does your car have the performance package? (edit: I see that your sig has the PP) The 515hp baseline is much stronger than any other dyno # I have seen for a stock CLS63...which would lead me to believe that this particular dyno reads higher...and you would apply a much lower parasitic loss % if you were to try to guesstimate crank hp.

Tom
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 10:58 AM
  #18  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by TMC M5
The difference may just be how the dyno operator got into the throttle on the two runs.
That's certainly the difference. It was actually two different guys operating the dyno on each run. I'm sure they got into the throttle differently

Originally Posted by TMC M5
Getting back to your original point about parasitic loss...it all depends on the type of dyno. What type of dyno was it? Were the #'s corrected? Does your car have the performance package? (edit: I see that your sig has the PP) The 515hp baseline is much stronger than any other dyno # I have seen for a stock CLS63...which would lead me to believe that this particular dyno reads higher...and you would apply a much lower parasitic loss % if you were to try to guesstimate crank hp.

Tom
This dyno was a dynocom and numbers were corrected. It's very possible the dyno reads higher. This is why it's impossible to compare one dyno number to another. For this test I was simply wanting to measure the gains from stock VS tuned on the same dyno.

If Ali's number of 9.5% holds true then this dyno is not that far off.
516 rwhp x 9.5% drive train loss = 565 crank HP
That's only a 15 crank HP variance from Mercedes advertised 550 HP

Last edited by Ready2roll; Dec 29, 2011 at 12:23 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:30 PM
  #19  
Vic55's Avatar
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador

20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 12,263
Likes: 901
From: THE Orange County, California
2024 C8 Z06- 2025 BMW CS- 2022 Porsche 992 GTS
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
Well, that's not exactly true. If you look at the chart the base line dyno reading started capturing at 2500 RPM whereas the tuned dyno run started at 3000. This gives the illusion that the stock tune may be stronger than the tuned version in the lower RPM ranges. If you move the Orange lines over to the start of the blue lines you can see the gains in the lower RPM's.

I assure you the "seat of my pants dyno" feels very strong gains right off idle
My bad, and I have zero doubt the car moves faster in all points... Im sure the tune starts the boost up higher earlier which gives you immediate power.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:32 PM
  #20  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by Vic55
My bad, and I have zero doubt the car moves faster in all points... Im sure the tune starts the boost up higher earlier which gives you immediate power.
No worries Vic. The graph does look confusing.
Next chance I get I will swing by the shop and have them re pull it on the dyno and this time start capturing at 2500 RPM
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 07:10 PM
  #21  
vdubpower's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,279
Likes: 58
From: OC
i drive them all, fast and hard
did you start with the PP,

wondering if someone is gonna tune anyways, if it matters whether to get the PP version. besides the other aspects of it
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 07:22 PM
  #22  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by vdubpower
did you start with the PP,

wondering if someone is gonna tune anyways, if it matters whether to get the PP version. besides the other aspects of it
Yes, my car did have the PP package to begin with. You can save some money and not get the PP package and just get the Vtech tune and the results would be the same as a PP car with Vtech tune for a whole lot less money

Last edited by Ready2roll; Dec 29, 2011 at 10:14 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 02:18 PM
  #23  
805Benz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: California
C2S CAB & C6Z06 & CLS63
Hope you having lots of fun with the new toy. Any new videos from the dig, 60-mph-100mph, ect?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2012 | 04:40 PM
  #24  
Ready2roll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 221
Likes: 4
2012 CLS 63 AMG
Originally Posted by 805Benz
Hope you having lots of fun with the new toy. Any new videos from the dig, 60-mph-100mph, ect?
I've been having a great time with the car

I'll get you guys some video very soon. I'm hoping to take it to the drag strip Friday night to get some times. I'll keep you guys posted
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 06:03 AM
  #25  
Ali_E55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 13
From: Abu Dhabi
C218 CLS63TT PP Edition1, W213 E63S
Originally Posted by Ready2roll
That's certainly the difference. It was actually two different guys operating the dyno on each run. I'm sure they got into the throttle differently



This dyno was a dynocom and numbers were corrected. It's very possible the dyno reads higher. This is why it's impossible to compare one dyno number to another. For this test I was simply wanting to measure the gains from stock VS tuned on the same dyno.

If Ali's number of 9.5% holds true then this dyno is not that far off.
516 rwhp x 9.5% drive train loss = 565 crank HP
That's only a 15 crank HP variance from Mercedes advertised 550 HP
stock CLS63 PP is rated in the manual 557hp so 9 hp are missing. but it is close though.

how is your car running ?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE