BANNED From Service Department
age of entitlement?
The reality is, that happy people don't take surveys, only pissed off ones with an axe to grind use the survey as an opportunity to cry about the service. That's why they make a big deal out of it. They need all the positives they can get, to balance out the 5% of people that give you 50% of your surveys.
The best way to resolve your concerns is to escalate them right then and there, go the the service director, or the GM of the dealership, or MBUSA corporate. All of those will get you results quicker than a bad survey. A bad survey just costs all of those people money, even down to the SA and the tech to a minor point (not having proper CSI can exclude the tech from certain performance bonus programs but they aren't much). Bonuses for commissioned employees are heavily weighted on CSI.
Went for a 60k major, here comes the call from dealer, the 3 emails from corporate, then a survey ok that's fine.
Then an oil change and the same 2 months later. Then again for exhaust rattle one month after that. Big waste of time.
Went for a 60k major, here comes the call from dealer, the 3 emails from corporate, then a survey ok that's fine.
Then an oil change and the same 2 months later. Then again for exhaust rattle one month after that. Big waste of time.
This is exactly what I mean. You didn't have a bad service visit, but you feel the survey is a waste of time. The upset customer with an axe to grind loves to blast everyone on the survey. So dealers need happy people to fill out the survey to compensate.




The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The reality is, that happy people don't take surveys, only pissed off ones with an axe to grind use the survey as an opportunity to cry about the service. That's why they make a big deal out of it. They need all the positives they can get, to balance out the 5% of people that give you 50% of your surveys.
The best way to resolve your concerns is to escalate them right then and there, go the the service director, or the GM of the dealership, or MBUSA corporate. All of those will get you results quicker than a bad survey. A bad survey just costs all of those people money, even down to the SA and the tech to a minor point (not having proper CSI can exclude the tech from certain performance bonus programs but they aren't much). Bonuses for commissioned employees are heavily weighted on CSI.
Lone customer feedback should (almost) never dictate negative management actions against an employee. Never. That's like business 101 stuff, because as described here, it's (almost) never an unbiased opinion.
A sample of customer feedback is supposed to be used as a guide to shape your management/customer service offerings/needs/wants/spot poor trends/etc. One douchebag *****ing because he can is generally tossed into the "not valid" pile in any other business.
Car business is so screwed up.
Last edited by Mike450; Oct 13, 2016 at 12:57 PM.
Lone customer feedback should (almost) never dictate negative management actions against an employee. Never. That's like business 101 stuff, because as described here, it's (almost) never an unbiased opinion.
A sample of customer feedback is supposed to be used as a guide to shape your management/customer service offerings/needs/wants/spot poor trends/etc. One douchebag *****ing because he can is generally tossed into the "not valid" pile in any other business.
Car business is so screwed up.
If the senior executives lose money, everyone below them also loses too as they are tied this number. It is a truly insane process where you and your people can execute flawlessly for your customers, but because a single customer in another state or region that you and your people have nothing to do with either didn't send the survey back (that counts as a ZERO to corporate) or gave less than all 10's, you and all your people not only lose out comp wise, but are then at risk of being fired in the next round of layoffs. So as you can see, this insane mentality is not limited to merely the auto industry.
Thanks for the info. GL to anyone that has to deal with that. It's an assinine way to evaluate any performance metric that drives your company's profitability.
agreed --- this survey centric model is killing business on the one hand but giving the customer an advocate on the other hand and a source of leverage
my SA always seems so nervous after I bring the car in encouraging me to give him a perfect survey
agreed --- this survey centric model is killing business on the one hand but giving the customer an advocate on the other hand and a source of leverage
my SA always seems so nervous after I bring the car in encouraging me to give him a perfect survey




Lone customer feedback should (almost) never dictate negative management actions against an employee. Never. That's like business 101 stuff, because as described here, it's (almost) never an unbiased opinion.
A sample of customer feedback is supposed to be used as a guide to shape your management/customer service offerings/needs/wants/spot poor trends/etc. One douchebag *****ing because he can is generally tossed into the "not valid" pile in any other business.
Car business is so screwed up.




I have learned over the years that the surveys are unfortunately so critical to the dealer and the employee who serviced you that filling out with bad grades actually does the opposite of what you want (get meaningful help from the the dealer and attention from the mother ship). The dealer punishes the SA by lowering his pay and MB USA reduces benefits paid to the dealer. The assumption that the dealer will help is flawed in that scenario. You are better off dealing one on one with the SA, the service manager or the GSM and make them your friend to help you achieve what you want.
Assuming you have a bad vehicle, you need the dealer to cooperate fixing it or help with the process of getting MB to buy it back.
Sounds very political.
Not filling out a survey truthfully because you want to get 'good' service? Pfffft.... pathetic.
EDIT: After reading more comments, seems MB employees are 'fixing' these surveys. Telling people to not fill it out unless it's perfect is just crazy! Completely flawed.
Last edited by MTV10; Oct 16, 2016 at 10:20 AM.




Not filling out a survey truthfully because you want to get 'good' service? Pfffft.... pathetic.
EDIT: After reading more comments, seems MB employees are 'fixing' these surveys. Telling people to not fill it out unless it's perfect is just crazy! Completely flawed.
To be sure everyone wants perfect, friendly and timely service and support when purchasing or servicing their car. But the reality is that you are dealing with people and all that comes with it.
Most companies provide surveys just for corporate correctness you can fill it out any way you want and never hear back either way. The results likely never even be looked at or just statistically analyzed.
BMW is such a place. Don't even waste your time filling out a survey...
I look at the MB survey as a tool that gives the customer additional leverage. If used in a friendly way, it is very effective in getting the extra attention if something isn't done right.
To be sure everyone wants perfect, friendly and timely service and support when purchasing or servicing their car. But the reality is that you are dealing with people and all that comes with it.
Most companies provide surveys just for corporate correctness you can fill it out any way you want and never hear back either way. The results likely never even be looked at or just statistically analyzed.
BMW is such a place. Don't even waste your time filling out a survey...
I look at the MB survey as a tool that gives the customer additional leverage. If used in a friendly way, it is very effective in getting the extra attention if something isn't done right.
Some dealers may care more while others care less but it definitely affects BMW. I know because I have a few friends who run BMW dealerships.




I have never heard a beep from BMW. If it would affect the financials like MB I assume there would have been follow up.
I have never heard a beep from BMW. If it would affect the financials like MB I assume there would have been follow up.





