amg gt vs gts
#1
amg gt vs gts
Hello,
I'm here from the jag side of the world, f type r FTW!
Considering the amg gt for my next car. I dislike getting the base model in any car, but the gts is a bit out of my price range. Can I get your expertise on the differences between the gt and gts?
From the mb website specs, I see the following:
-gt has lower HP and torque, at slightly lower rpm
-gt has thinner tires and smaller rear wheels by standard options
-gt doesn't get leather seats by standard options
-gt gets manual adaptive suspension, while gts gets interactive adaptive suspension
The last one seems important, but since every manufacturer makes up their own language, I'd appreciate some clarification. Can you gentlemen (and women) explain this to me? Does this affect handling or comfort?
Also, please let me know if I missed something, or if I'm underestimating they impact of something like smaller wheels!
Thanks!
I'm here from the jag side of the world, f type r FTW!
Considering the amg gt for my next car. I dislike getting the base model in any car, but the gts is a bit out of my price range. Can I get your expertise on the differences between the gt and gts?
From the mb website specs, I see the following:
-gt has lower HP and torque, at slightly lower rpm
-gt has thinner tires and smaller rear wheels by standard options
-gt doesn't get leather seats by standard options
-gt gets manual adaptive suspension, while gts gets interactive adaptive suspension
The last one seems important, but since every manufacturer makes up their own language, I'd appreciate some clarification. Can you gentlemen (and women) explain this to me? Does this affect handling or comfort?
Also, please let me know if I missed something, or if I'm underestimating they impact of something like smaller wheels!
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
You can option a GT to be identical to a GTS, save for following:
- Race mode
- Crested armrest
- ... and the performance mapping
- Race mode
- Crested armrest
- ... and the performance mapping
#3
Senior Member
In relation to suspension, the standard passive GT suspension is dual valved (or something), while the AMG Performance Suspension is electronic/switchable.
The later is very effective, Comfort is pretty that, while the sportier settings firm up progressively.
The later is very effective, Comfort is pretty that, while the sportier settings firm up progressively.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 1,107
Received 358 Likes
on
204 Posts
2022 AMG SL63
One of the other features in the Dynamic Plus Package gives "more negative front-wheel camber for crisper, more direct response in the most athletic of driving situations."
Of course whether any of these features (or the others) included in the Dynamic Plus Package are useful or desirable to you is another question...but there are some significant differences between the two models.
Trending Topics
The following users liked this post:
Gojirra99 (01-11-2018)
#9
Dynamic Plus matters, especially if the handling advantage the amg has over the f type is due to those technologies.
From the build page I see the gt has a Dynamic package that allows for multiple modes, but not "race" mode.
From the build page I see the gt has a Dynamic package that allows for multiple modes, but not "race" mode.
#10
Member
I believe the rationale was discussed in many other posts, but the bottom line is that from an actual performance difference, it's negligable. It's hard for me to not get "the nicest one" but after much research, and time spent in both - I ended up going with a GT that I spec'd out above and beyond a stock GTS, reason being was I felt that for the money - it was a lot more car per dollar. I wanted the carbon ceramic brakes, and on the 17' it was an option. On the 18', I hear you can't get the GT with them. As far as the interior, it's the exact same, save for the center armrest cover has an embossed Affelterbach logo (but, I ordered one ..and it was only $500
).. One thing that wasn't discussed was the fact that the GTS has an electronic controlled rear differential, whereas the GT has a standard mechanical locking diff. Those who have driven both will say the mechanical feels like it has more of a "bite" if that makes sense, that for hard driving, it's a bit better. There is a video floating around that explains it.. I will see if I can find it. Basically, Its harder to get in trouble with the GTS, as the fantastic electronic diff works well... maybe too well, for somebody who is trying to get wild with it. The mechanical diff, (if I'm not mistsken - is the same one that was in the SLS.) the Dynamic package is for sure a much harsher ride.. I have driven both, and for a pure track car? Great. Daily driver? Not so much. The power band increase is basically intended for track use, and if you ever intended on tuning the car - it would be wiped anyway. As far as race mode? You can't use it for daily driving. It's for track use.. just holds the rev's to redline in auto mode!
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
Last edited by xcfisher; 04-22-2017 at 10:39 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Case1906 (02-24-2021)
#11
Member
Good comments above.
I picked the GTS over the GT. When I roll up the number, the GTS was a better deal.
I wanted exclusive leather and a nice interior. I did not want ceramic brakes and I wanted to stay with stock 19" rims vs spening $10k on aftermarket. I wantd launch mode. To get all that the cost difference is small, except for when you go to sell it an no one wants a GT and people will only pay top dollar for a GTS.
I picked the GTS over the GT. When I roll up the number, the GTS was a better deal.
I wanted exclusive leather and a nice interior. I did not want ceramic brakes and I wanted to stay with stock 19" rims vs spening $10k on aftermarket. I wantd launch mode. To get all that the cost difference is small, except for when you go to sell it an no one wants a GT and people will only pay top dollar for a GTS.
#12
Senior Member
The GT does have launch control.
Think it would be close in terms of resale on a lighly optioned GTS, versus a very pretty GT.
Think it would be close in terms of resale on a lighly optioned GTS, versus a very pretty GT.
#15
It's the same car with enough differences, including the name, horse power, calipers, etc, and the fact it's not the lowest model. The GT will always be the lowest model, nothing will change that.
The following users liked this post:
philster-1 (09-05-2020)
#17
This is really good post.
With the advent of the GTC there is quite a bit of variety vying for a purchasers' attention.
First up - I love the car!
I love the concept and I love the technology.
My only previous MBs were a C43 and E55 over 10 years ago.
(I really miss the C43).
I drove GTS demonstrator and was wowed! Seriously overawed!
I currently, only have older cars - 1971 Alfa 1750 GTV, 2003 6 speed Murcie, 1985 Testa, manual 2005 DB9 - this is my first ever paddle car.
I am not a race driver, sporting car driver etc etc.
I appreciate the cars as artwork and ambience.
I love to look and admire...yes, the aural magnificence in sport/race mode is superb...
Driving is secondary but important.
I bought a GT with a lot of options - Solarbeam; sport seats; cover; bigger wheels etc...I think, that unless you are a high end driver, with space and roads to appreciate, you will not notice the difference between GT/S/C.
Just my 2 c worth...
For sure resale, people WILL go for the badge difference...
Best Regards to all
Phil
Australia
With the advent of the GTC there is quite a bit of variety vying for a purchasers' attention.
First up - I love the car!
I love the concept and I love the technology.
My only previous MBs were a C43 and E55 over 10 years ago.
(I really miss the C43).
I drove GTS demonstrator and was wowed! Seriously overawed!
I currently, only have older cars - 1971 Alfa 1750 GTV, 2003 6 speed Murcie, 1985 Testa, manual 2005 DB9 - this is my first ever paddle car.
I am not a race driver, sporting car driver etc etc.
I appreciate the cars as artwork and ambience.
I love to look and admire...yes, the aural magnificence in sport/race mode is superb...
Driving is secondary but important.
I bought a GT with a lot of options - Solarbeam; sport seats; cover; bigger wheels etc...I think, that unless you are a high end driver, with space and roads to appreciate, you will not notice the difference between GT/S/C.
Just my 2 c worth...
For sure resale, people WILL go for the badge difference...
Best Regards to all
Phil
Australia
#18
Senior Member
#20
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 C63 AMG w/ Development Package
Hello,
I'm here from the jag side of the world, f type r FTW!
Considering the amg gt for my next car. I dislike getting the base model in any car, but the gts is a bit out of my price range. Can I get your expertise on the differences between the gt and gts?
From the mb website specs, I see the following:
-gt has lower HP and torque, at slightly lower rpm
-gt has thinner tires and smaller rear wheels by standard options
-gt doesn't get leather seats by standard options
-gt gets manual adaptive suspension, while gts gets interactive adaptive suspension
The last one seems important, but since every manufacturer makes up their own language, I'd appreciate some clarification. Can you gentlemen (and women) explain this to me? Does this affect handling or comfort?
Also, please let me know if I missed something, or if I'm underestimating they impact of something like smaller wheels!
Thanks!
I'm here from the jag side of the world, f type r FTW!
Considering the amg gt for my next car. I dislike getting the base model in any car, but the gts is a bit out of my price range. Can I get your expertise on the differences between the gt and gts?
From the mb website specs, I see the following:
-gt has lower HP and torque, at slightly lower rpm
-gt has thinner tires and smaller rear wheels by standard options
-gt doesn't get leather seats by standard options
-gt gets manual adaptive suspension, while gts gets interactive adaptive suspension
The last one seems important, but since every manufacturer makes up their own language, I'd appreciate some clarification. Can you gentlemen (and women) explain this to me? Does this affect handling or comfort?
Also, please let me know if I missed something, or if I'm underestimating they impact of something like smaller wheels!
Thanks!
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#21
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Santa Monica Mountains
Posts: 973
Received 677 Likes
on
359 Posts
2020 GTA; 2022 Audi e-tron GT, 2022 Ford F-150; 1926 Rolls-Royce Springfield 40/50 Playboy roadster
If 469 HP on the street is sufficient for you, then the GT will do. It also has a slightly more compliant (comfortable) ride.
It is unlikely you will ever get to 7/10ths of its acceleration or handling capabilities unless you track it.
It is unlikely you will ever get to 7/10ths of its acceleration or handling capabilities unless you track it.
#22
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!