Anyone else experience diesel discrimination?



Back in the early 90s, when I was driving diesel Rabbits, the promotional literature for AAA indicated that they would bring you "fuel" as a part of their road service. As a pilot, I'm predisposed to believe that there are very few excuses for a rational individual to ever run out of fuel in a motor vehicle, but I managed to find one.
I was driving in Northern Virginia at night, when my engine went dead. My fuel gauge was reading 1/4 tank, but after troubleshooting, all of the symptoms were of fuel starvation. (It later turned out that a bad vent caused the fuel tank to run empty and collapse onto the sender, causing a false reading.)
I called AAA, and asked for someone to bring me fuel, to which they said "Oh, we can't have anyone bring you diesel, only gasoline." I said, "then send me a tow truck."
Of course, when the tow arrived, he asked "Why didn't you just have us bring you some diesel fuel?" I was really torqued. I cancelled my membership on the spot and have been happy to use Mercedes-Benz road service for almost all of my needs for the past 8 years or so.
I'm just wondering if there are other cases where diesel drivers are second-class citizens or where vendors don't do what they say they'll do if you're in a diesel vehicle?
"Why did you buy a diesel?"
or
"Was it a lot cheaper to get the diesel?"
- you should see the shock on their face when I tell them I bough a E350 and a E320 CDI with similar options and the CDI cost more!
For me the diesel engine is a superior design in every respect except sound level, and even the the E350 is not much quieter when you're on the freeway.
But she was a certified nut case. She wound up shooting her husband, putting him in a wheelchair for life, and killing herself.




IMHO "propaganda" is better word. Regardless, whoever steers this government - it is steering citizens away from affordable transportation.
The best sample for me was VW diesel from 1980's. I used to drive Rabbit pickups, but the only diesel engine available in USA was 44 HP. The power was annoying as I had to turn AC off for better acceleration, but 35 mpg vehicles had lot of admires even as of today, what is like 35 years later.
What I am getting to is that those cars were available with turbo-charged 75 HP version, but the better version never made it to USA, although I have seen Mexico could enjoy it.
Bare in mind that in those years all diesel cars have been exempt from smogs in all states, so the lack of choices could not be pollution- related.
Last edited by kajtek1; May 25, 2020 at 02:42 PM.
Trending Topics




Later the story changed that they can make x to y % of diesel or v ot z % of gasoline.
No matter how exactly it works, they seem to have pretty big flexibility what fuel to manufacture from the crude.
Europe is converting gasoline engines to propane and they don't worry about too much gasoline.
Than why small gasoline engines are not allowed in this country? Evidently people having upper power want the fuel to flow in high amounts.
"Buy 7 mpg Hummer and 3 mpg boat>>> you deserve it". Is't that what 1 of Presidents said?
Last edited by kajtek1; May 28, 2020 at 01:55 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Later the story changed that they can make x to y % of diesel or v ot z % of gasoline.
No matter how exactly it works, they seem to have pretty big flexibility what fuel to manufacture from the crude.
Europe is converting gasoline engines to propane and they don't worry about too much gasoline.
Than why small gasoline engines are not allowed in this country? Evidently people having upper power want the fuel to flow in high amounts.
"Buy 7 mpg Hummer and 3 mpg boat>>> you deserve it". Is't that what 1 of Presidents said?
Long story short, if you do chemical reductions, then you can produce any amount of gas and/or diesel. However if you rely on distillation, there's only certain amount of gas and diesel present in the crude oil so there's a limit on the proportion you can do, but you can tune the distillation parameters to give some variations on it.
Europe has developed biodiesels so they are producing much more diesel than gas, plus since biodiesel is considered a recycled/regenerated energy source the tax rate on it is much lower. US is influenced by those oil tycoons and they like people to use as much oil as possible that's a different story. Even natural gas has a short history in US compared to any other countries.
The biodiesel thing was looooong planned. I remember in late 1990s when the oil price crisis happened there were a lot of discussions about renewable energy and the power source for future cars. Looked to me that European scientists were in favor of biodiesel while US scientists like hydrogen and fuel cell better.




https://theconversation.com/fact-che...rol-cars-76241
Those stereotypes against diesels are mainly due to the impression of those old cuttlefish diesel vehicles. I saw a lot of those buses when I was young as well. But nowadays diesel engines are more and more clean. Not to mention those cuttlefish were mainly due to poor maintenance.



