Carlsson C-Tronic CD32 installed into my CDI...OMFG!!!
#1
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
2005 Carlsson CD32 E320 CDI Inline-6
Carlsson C-Tronic CD32 installed into my CDI...OMFG!!!
Just amazing what a simple software upgrade can do.
My CDI is getting 3-4 MPG more, around town, and I'm not exactly trying to go easy on it with my new mod.
That's the desert. The main course is TORQUE!
The motor is extremely eager. Stepping off a light at 1/4 throttle it now feels like a Jetliner when initial thrust is applied. You can feel the driveline tense up as power in advanced, and the car yanked into motion.
I don't have baseline or actual numbers on acceleration, but definitely a different animal. Breaks traction, without trying, needs a limited slip differential.
The most enjoyable aspect is accelerating on uphill runs, the motor is just so eager it feels like it should have more work to do than just drag a little 4,000 lb car around. It wants to truck!
My CDI is getting 3-4 MPG more, around town, and I'm not exactly trying to go easy on it with my new mod.
That's the desert. The main course is TORQUE!
The motor is extremely eager. Stepping off a light at 1/4 throttle it now feels like a Jetliner when initial thrust is applied. You can feel the driveline tense up as power in advanced, and the car yanked into motion.
I don't have baseline or actual numbers on acceleration, but definitely a different animal. Breaks traction, without trying, needs a limited slip differential.
The most enjoyable aspect is accelerating on uphill runs, the motor is just so eager it feels like it should have more work to do than just drag a little 4,000 lb car around. It wants to truck!
#2
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 522
Likes: 2
From: ct
All Diesel Fleet !1983 240d stick,2005 E320 CDI Midnight blue, 2005 E320 CDI, Desert Silver, Kubota
Would you mind sharing how much it cost, and where it was done? thanks. Are you sure of the mileage figures?
#3
Did they provide you with a engine and/or wheel dyno sheet of how well it performs? How is the extra power obtained, e.g. increased timing/rail pressure, injection duration?
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, MD / Wash. DC
Its big and Grey!
here is some info I found..
http://www.carlsson.de/en/tuning/e-k...motor/cd32.php
http://www.carnews.nu/car-news.php?n...article&sid=75
http://www.carlsson.de/en/tuning/e-k...motor/cd32.php
http://www.carnews.nu/car-news.php?n...article&sid=75
#5
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
2005 Carlsson CD32 E320 CDI Inline-6
Answers to above, to best of my knowledge:
Jimbo: Cost, about $1600, bought directly from Carlsson North America. Link there site from the .de site, you can click on www.carlsson.de and follow to the North America site.
I installed it myself in less than 1 hour, it slides into a special tray near the ECU, and truly is plug-and-play. It could be removed just as quick.
If you PM me I will forward the North America director's contact info to you, he is very knowlegeable. You can get it from other outfits, like Carlson Products USA in Texas, but I wouldn't advise it, they don't return calls or email even with a potential puchase dangled in front of them.
I was assured that rail pressure is not the means of power gain, which is exactly why I did not go with one of the cheaper options that solders a chip into your ECU. The added power is only available with the motor at full operating temperature.
There are dyno charts supplied with my literature, they indicate torque is peak at 2200 RPM approx, and HP peaks just over 4000 or so. The chart shows a huge torque gain at 2200, and then much meatier torque all the way though 4000. HP is a straight line up to 4200 whereas stock starts to go limp at 3500.
Cannot be sure of mileage without a longer test period, will check it over time and keep you posted. The dash cluster is telling me 28-30 MPG for most around-town runs, whereas I was looking at typically 24-26 MPG around town previously.
I installed it myself in less than 1 hour, it slides into a special tray near the ECU, and truly is plug-and-play. It could be removed just as quick.
If you PM me I will forward the North America director's contact info to you, he is very knowlegeable. You can get it from other outfits, like Carlson Products USA in Texas, but I wouldn't advise it, they don't return calls or email even with a potential puchase dangled in front of them.
I was assured that rail pressure is not the means of power gain, which is exactly why I did not go with one of the cheaper options that solders a chip into your ECU. The added power is only available with the motor at full operating temperature.
There are dyno charts supplied with my literature, they indicate torque is peak at 2200 RPM approx, and HP peaks just over 4000 or so. The chart shows a huge torque gain at 2200, and then much meatier torque all the way though 4000. HP is a straight line up to 4200 whereas stock starts to go limp at 3500.
Cannot be sure of mileage without a longer test period, will check it over time and keep you posted. The dash cluster is telling me 28-30 MPG for most around-town runs, whereas I was looking at typically 24-26 MPG around town previously.
#7
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
2005 Carlsson CD32 E320 CDI Inline-6
Carlsson offers "ECO" and "POWER" versions.
If that's your question.
ECO:
Carlsson claims 10% better fuel economy, same HP as stock. Bottom-end torque is 570 N/m @2,000, a good improvement over the stock 500 N/m.
POWER:
Claims 580 N/m and 240 HP. Claims fuel economy improves in lower rev range. This is the unit in my car. Fuel economy is notably better, based on my first impressions.
ECO:
Carlsson claims 10% better fuel economy, same HP as stock. Bottom-end torque is 570 N/m @2,000, a good improvement over the stock 500 N/m.
POWER:
Claims 580 N/m and 240 HP. Claims fuel economy improves in lower rev range. This is the unit in my car. Fuel economy is notably better, based on my first impressions.
Trending Topics
#9
cdiken,
What made you decide to go with the Carlsson over the other main manufactures or were you dead set on Carlsson?
http://www.brabus-online.de/prog14e.htm
http://www.kleemann.dk/site/Main/tuningproducts/ecu
What made you decide to go with the Carlsson over the other main manufactures or were you dead set on Carlsson?
http://www.brabus-online.de/prog14e.htm
http://www.kleemann.dk/site/Main/tuningproducts/ecu
#10
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
2005 Carlsson CD32 E320 CDI Inline-6
Did not want my ECU mailed or remapped.
The three tuners I considered were Brabus, Carlsson, or Renntech based on reputation and references including MBWORLD posts....thank you MBWORLD!
Cheap $350-$450 solder chipping was out of the question. No open-heart surgery on my ECU under warranty or not. Plus, most of the cheapo units cheat and boost fuel pressure excessively in the common rail, no thanks at 23,000 PSI stock, you could almost make diamonds by putting coal in there.
Renntech was out as I didn't want my ECU remapped or in transit in the mail. Since dealers sometimes have to reflash an ECU for various reasons, I didn't want to set myself up for that potential hassle in the future. Not to mention if the motor goes BOOM I don't want to be told it was my fault for altering the ECU.
Brabus, while apparently posts a few HP more, was out because of price. Close to $4,000, that's getting extreme to spend on an E320.
So Carlsson it is. Good service and reputation. Plug and play, not too expensive at $1600.
In my haste I didn't realize Kleeman had a CDI upgrade, just clicked on Flint's link...Holy Schitt, Kleeman boasts 670 N/m or nearly 500 lb/ft of torque. I wonder if common-rail fuel pressure is up? That is a mountain of torque! More than the E400 CDI twin-turbo V8 stock or with Kleeman tuning. The I6 engine apparently has more potential, strength, and durability than the new V6, as Kleeman only boosts that engine to 250 HP and 600 N/m gains for that engine. Still no slouch, but not the 265 HP and 670 N/m for the I6.
These numbers make me tend to think Diesel, in general, has huge potential. If just software can post big gains, imagine as materials and technology in general improve, diesels may become the fuel of choice to build serious power in automotive engines. It already is (and has been for 50 years) in trucking, rail, equipment, etc.
I predict the real challenge to diesel performance will be constructing a driveline that can handle extreme torque without adding substantial weight to a car. The basic Diesel characteristic of making big power by huge torque (vs. high RPM's) is a limitation, esp if we are ever to see a 200+ mph diesel, the torque would have to be monumental to make that kind of power without high rpm's.
Lets see...an AMG 8 liter V-12 tri-turbo 60 valve (5 per cylinder) intercooled, propane injected diesel G series truck. 2200 HP and 4,000 lb/ft of torque. 0-300 MPH in under 5 seconds and 25 MPG!!! Dual 6" diameter exhausts, sticking straight through the hood.
Cheap $350-$450 solder chipping was out of the question. No open-heart surgery on my ECU under warranty or not. Plus, most of the cheapo units cheat and boost fuel pressure excessively in the common rail, no thanks at 23,000 PSI stock, you could almost make diamonds by putting coal in there.
Renntech was out as I didn't want my ECU remapped or in transit in the mail. Since dealers sometimes have to reflash an ECU for various reasons, I didn't want to set myself up for that potential hassle in the future. Not to mention if the motor goes BOOM I don't want to be told it was my fault for altering the ECU.
Brabus, while apparently posts a few HP more, was out because of price. Close to $4,000, that's getting extreme to spend on an E320.
So Carlsson it is. Good service and reputation. Plug and play, not too expensive at $1600.
In my haste I didn't realize Kleeman had a CDI upgrade, just clicked on Flint's link...Holy Schitt, Kleeman boasts 670 N/m or nearly 500 lb/ft of torque. I wonder if common-rail fuel pressure is up? That is a mountain of torque! More than the E400 CDI twin-turbo V8 stock or with Kleeman tuning. The I6 engine apparently has more potential, strength, and durability than the new V6, as Kleeman only boosts that engine to 250 HP and 600 N/m gains for that engine. Still no slouch, but not the 265 HP and 670 N/m for the I6.
These numbers make me tend to think Diesel, in general, has huge potential. If just software can post big gains, imagine as materials and technology in general improve, diesels may become the fuel of choice to build serious power in automotive engines. It already is (and has been for 50 years) in trucking, rail, equipment, etc.
I predict the real challenge to diesel performance will be constructing a driveline that can handle extreme torque without adding substantial weight to a car. The basic Diesel characteristic of making big power by huge torque (vs. high RPM's) is a limitation, esp if we are ever to see a 200+ mph diesel, the torque would have to be monumental to make that kind of power without high rpm's.
Lets see...an AMG 8 liter V-12 tri-turbo 60 valve (5 per cylinder) intercooled, propane injected diesel G series truck. 2200 HP and 4,000 lb/ft of torque. 0-300 MPH in under 5 seconds and 25 MPG!!! Dual 6" diameter exhausts, sticking straight through the hood.
Last edited by cdiken; 12-18-2005 at 09:25 PM.
#11
You guys could email info@euroteckmotorsports.com for the Carlsson chip. He's probably be able to get the chip for cheaper than 1600$
#12
Originally Posted by cdiken
In my haste I didn't realize Kleeman had a CDI upgrade, just clicked on Flint's link...Holy Schitt, Kleeman boasts 670 N/m or nearly 500 lb/ft of torque. I wonder if common-rail fuel pressure is up? That is a mountain of torque! More than the E400 CDI twin-turbo V8 stock or with Kleeman tuning. The I6 engine apparently has more potential, strength, and durability than the new V6, as Kleeman only boosts that engine to 250 HP and 600 N/m gains for that engine. Still no slouch, but not the 265 HP and 670 N/m for the I6.
The other question I have is about particulate smoke out the tailpipe. Are you seeing visible smoke in your rear view mirror when the engine is under load? My experience with the KD-Box was noticeably more power, with the biggest torque difference at 2,200 RPM. However, I also saw quite a bit of visible smoke out the tailpipe. Without the KD-Box; no smoke.
Thanks.
#13
Thread Starter
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
2005 Carlsson CD32 E320 CDI Inline-6
No smoke....
No visible smoke at any throttle position. Although your smoke situation, while not becoming of a 2006 Mercedes, actually sounds kinda cool....twin entrails of black smoke, I would love to see it! Anyone who knows anything about a modern diesel and sees that smoke knows not to choose you at the stoplight pole position lest they be clowned! Or on the open road, you'll clown 'em there too!
The electrical connections are all at the ECU location next to the fuse panel. (Under a cover, against firewall, driver's side). Carlssson provides a rather intricate looking insert or "sandwich adaptor" that goes between the ECU and its 2 connectors. Everything is of OEM quality. The "sandwich" insert has jumper wires that go to the Carlsson box, which rides next to the ECU in a special basket they provide.
BTW does that 670 N/m sound right to you? The car must just absolutely stick you in the seat.
The electrical connections are all at the ECU location next to the fuse panel. (Under a cover, against firewall, driver's side). Carlssson provides a rather intricate looking insert or "sandwich adaptor" that goes between the ECU and its 2 connectors. Everything is of OEM quality. The "sandwich" insert has jumper wires that go to the Carlsson box, which rides next to the ECU in a special basket they provide.
BTW does that 670 N/m sound right to you? The car must just absolutely stick you in the seat.
#14
Originally Posted by cdiken
These numbers make me tend to think Diesel, in general, has huge potential. If just software can post big gains, imagine as materials and technology in general improve, diesels may become the fuel of choice to build serious power in automotive engines. It already is (and has been for 50 years) in trucking, rail, equipment, etc.
I predict the real challenge to diesel performance will be constructing a driveline that can handle extreme torque without adding substantial weight to a car. The basic Diesel characteristic of making big power by huge torque (vs. high RPM's) is a limitation, esp if we are ever to see a 200+ mph diesel, the torque would have to be monumental to make that kind of power without high rpm's.
I predict the real challenge to diesel performance will be constructing a driveline that can handle extreme torque without adding substantial weight to a car. The basic Diesel characteristic of making big power by huge torque (vs. high RPM's) is a limitation, esp if we are ever to see a 200+ mph diesel, the torque would have to be monumental to make that kind of power without high rpm's.
Well, let me introduce you to an organization I have been with since its inception, the Diesel Hot Rod Association. We have been racing diesels since late 1999, and decided to start an official organization to sanction our own races.
Anyway, diesel engines have HUGE potential. I know some folks in negotiations with Mercedes to stuff an ~800hp MB diesel into something like the SLK/CLK strictly for drag racing. We have our Dodge trucks (diesels) running in the 10s in the quarter. Mine is running low 13s at 7900 pounds with me in it and is still a daily driver. I would love to see a fleet of 11 second Mercedes diesels come and clean house.
So, at risk of hijacking the thread completely (sorry! ) the potential and interest in high performance diesels is certainly there.
On edit: Trails of smoke from one of my past trucks and one from a dear friend's truck.
Last edited by prometheus; 12-19-2005 at 07:22 AM.
#16
High HP diesels!
#17
Originally Posted by cdiken
No visible smoke at any throttle position. Although your smoke situation, while not becoming of a 2006 Mercedes, actually sounds kinda cool....twin entrails of black smoke, I would love to see it! Anyone who knows anything about a modern diesel and sees that smoke knows not to choose you at the stoplight pole position lest they be clowned! Or on the open road, you'll clown 'em there too!
The electrical connections are all at the ECU location next to the fuse panel. (Under a cover, against firewall, driver's side). Carlssson provides a rather intricate looking insert or "sandwich adaptor" that goes between the ECU and its 2 connectors. Everything is of OEM quality. The "sandwich" insert has jumper wires that go to the Carlsson box, which rides next to the ECU in a special basket they provide.
BTW does that 670 N/m sound right to you? The car must just absolutely stick you in the seat.
The electrical connections are all at the ECU location next to the fuse panel. (Under a cover, against firewall, driver's side). Carlssson provides a rather intricate looking insert or "sandwich adaptor" that goes between the ECU and its 2 connectors. Everything is of OEM quality. The "sandwich" insert has jumper wires that go to the Carlsson box, which rides next to the ECU in a special basket they provide.
BTW does that 670 N/m sound right to you? The car must just absolutely stick you in the seat.
The Carlsson components appear to be a more elegant hardware setup than the KD-Box. And, about $500 more as well. And, you appear to be getting similar performance, and mpg improvements, as I did; but without the particulate smoke. There must be some differences in how the two units are increasing torque and hp.
I watched the tailpipe area behind my car during all the dyno runs. With stock setup - no visible smoke. With the KD-Box, plenty of smoke. I loved the power, but did not like the smoke. The engine ran perfectly, and no check-engine lights. I've since sold the car, but still have the box. I'll probably try to sell the KD-Box.
#18
Never heard of an wheel (chassis) dyno that compensates for parasitic driveline loss. What percentage loss did it use to calculate crank hp? Hope I read that right...
On edit: What shape was the torque curve? i.e. relatively flat between xxxx and xxxx rpm
On edit: What shape was the torque curve? i.e. relatively flat between xxxx and xxxx rpm
#19
Originally Posted by prometheus
Never heard of an wheel (chassis) dyno that compensates for parasitic driveline loss. What percentage loss did it use to calculate crank hp? Hope I read that right...
On edit: What shape was the torque curve? i.e. relatively flat between xxxx and xxxx rpm
On edit: What shape was the torque curve? i.e. relatively flat between xxxx and xxxx rpm
Last edited by themerc; 06-18-2007 at 10:23 AM.
#20
Originally Posted by themerc
The Carlsson components appear to be a more elegant hardware setup than the KD-Box. And, about $500 more as well. And, you appear to be getting similar performance, and mpg improvements, as I did; but without the particulate smoke. There must be some differences in how the two units are increasing torque and hp.
#21
Originally Posted by Sauerkraut
The difference is that Carlsson is not increasing the boost but they manipulate injection timing, a very elegant and gentle method to increase power but it needs more brainwork, therefore the higher price compared to Kleemann. But higher safety for the engine and common rail pump should be worth spending some extra $, right?.
It appears to me that both the CD32 and KD-Box take the signal from the stock ECU and change AFRs and injection timing from there. This; vs a software change on the ECU chip itself, as the Renntech program.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 4
From: Portugal
'08 CLK320CDI AMG// '13 E500 Coupe AMG// '17 E350d AMG
Good to see you guys in US liking so much the CDI's
In Europe we all know what diesel engines are and how easy is to get some more Hp and torque, thats why 67% of the cars sold in Europe are diesel
Hope to see more and more CDI's in US
Audi did show what a diesel engine could do in the new Audi R8
In Europe we all know what diesel engines are and how easy is to get some more Hp and torque, thats why 67% of the cars sold in Europe are diesel
Hope to see more and more CDI's in US
Audi did show what a diesel engine could do in the new Audi R8
#25
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 4
From: Toronto
2006 E320 CDi, 2008 3/4 Ton Suburban, 2007 "rice rickshaw" Accord 5 speed
More information please
[QUOTE=cdiken;1393479]Just amazing what a simple software upgrade can do.
My CDI is getting 3-4 MPG more, around town, and I'm not exactly trying to go easy on it with my new mod.
That's the desert. The main course is TORQUE!
The motor is extremely eager. Stepping off a light at 1/4 throttle it now feels like a Jetliner when initial thrust is applied. You can feel the driveline tense up as power in advanced, and the car yanked into motion.
I don't have baseline or actual numbers on acceleration, but definitely a different animal. Breaks traction, without trying, needs a limited slip differential.
__________________________________________________ ____
Dear Ken,
Where did you get your Carlsson box? How much and any installation charge? Unfortunately there is only Kleemann in Toronto. Thanks.
My CDI is getting 3-4 MPG more, around town, and I'm not exactly trying to go easy on it with my new mod.
That's the desert. The main course is TORQUE!
The motor is extremely eager. Stepping off a light at 1/4 throttle it now feels like a Jetliner when initial thrust is applied. You can feel the driveline tense up as power in advanced, and the car yanked into motion.
I don't have baseline or actual numbers on acceleration, but definitely a different animal. Breaks traction, without trying, needs a limited slip differential.
__________________________________________________ ____
Dear Ken,
Where did you get your Carlsson box? How much and any installation charge? Unfortunately there is only Kleemann in Toronto. Thanks.