2011 E350 Bluetech
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Says someone who's probably never seen the newer car.
My thoughts are based on seeing them at the dealer and adBlue and runflat tires have finally come to the E-class.
The W212 is an improvement on the W211 and although the engine is same as 2007-on W211 Bluetecs (minus the adBlue) either run rings around the '05-'06 inline diesels with the silly old 5-speed. Have had both.
Newer is ALWAYS better with Mercedes, as it's a reputable company selling on its engineering. Those that think the old stuff is better are simply jealous and rationalizing their position.
My thoughts are based on seeing them at the dealer and adBlue and runflat tires have finally come to the E-class.
The W212 is an improvement on the W211 and although the engine is same as 2007-on W211 Bluetecs (minus the adBlue) either run rings around the '05-'06 inline diesels with the silly old 5-speed. Have had both.
Newer is ALWAYS better with Mercedes, as it's a reputable company selling on its engineering. Those that think the old stuff is better are simply jealous and rationalizing their position.
#4
Member
The silly old 7 Speed has had a lot more issues than the 5 spd.
My dealer service advisor even embraces the 05-06, and thinks the Torque is better on the older inline 6 then the newer V6!
Newer is not always better, look at all the W211 early problems (03-04) in comparison to how good the previous generation was!!!
But this is all subjective! Buy what you like and what you feel is best!
My dealer service advisor even embraces the 05-06, and thinks the Torque is better on the older inline 6 then the newer V6!
Newer is not always better, look at all the W211 early problems (03-04) in comparison to how good the previous generation was!!!
But this is all subjective! Buy what you like and what you feel is best!
#5
Super Member
The W212 is an improvement on the W211 and although the engine is same as 2007-on W211 Bluetecs (minus the adBlue) either run rings around the '05-'06 inline diesels with the silly old 5-speed. Have had both.
Just curious, but what about the Bluetec V6/7spd runs circles around the I-6/5spd? I thought power & acceleration were very close, and the I-6 actually got slightly better mileage...
To the OP, everything I've read about the w212 Bluetec has been positive. We may look into one in a couple years, especially if MB releases a Bluetec wagon. But I'm really hoping for a w221 Bluetec...
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Four Oaks, NC
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1991 Mercedes 350SD, 2006 Mercedes E320 CDI
Stay away from any mercedes diesel beyond the 06 CDI with the straight 6. From 2007 until today, the V-6 diesel engines are throw away. The US EPA has destroyed the once reliable workhorse of years ago - the diesel engine of today is so burdened with stringent emission controls that you can guarantee routine shop visits to fix all the check engine lights that will plague the owner for years to come. Urea injection and particulate filters are regulatory requirements beyond the technology to build any reliability into these engines.
#7
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
A simple ECU reprogram and the E320 CDI will run rings around the bean-counter designed V6, get much better fuel economy and outlive it by many years (Not to mention its actually rebuildable when it wears out, the V6 is scrap metal when its worn out).
Newer is ALWAYS better with Mercedes
as it's a reputable company selling on its engineering.
everything I've read about the w212 Bluetec has been positive.
Trending Topics
#8
Stay away from any mercedes diesel beyond the 06 CDI with the straight 6. From 2007 until today, the V-6 diesel engines are throw away. The US EPA has destroyed the once reliable workhorse of years ago - the diesel engine of today is so burdened with stringent emission controls that you can guarantee routine shop visits to fix all the check engine lights that will plague the owner for years to come. Urea injection and particulate filters are regulatory requirements beyond the technology to build any reliability into these engines.
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
That is false information. The only reason its "faster" is because it uses a very small turbo for instant response (which sacrifices top-end power) and the DPF allows it to be tuned dirtier for more low-end torque.
A simple ECU reprogram and the E320 CDI will run rings around the bean-counter designed V6, get much better fuel economy and outlive it by many years (Not to mention its actually rebuildable when it wears out, the V6 is scrap metal when its worn out).
That is very wrong. Remember the 90's? Have you actually DRIVEN (not just looked at in a dealership) a V6/7sp?
Also false. Their marketing is based around luxury, performance and history. Engineering is at the back of the bus these days.
Except the worse fuel economy and $5000 DPF.
A simple ECU reprogram and the E320 CDI will run rings around the bean-counter designed V6, get much better fuel economy and outlive it by many years (Not to mention its actually rebuildable when it wears out, the V6 is scrap metal when its worn out).
That is very wrong. Remember the 90's? Have you actually DRIVEN (not just looked at in a dealership) a V6/7sp?
Also false. Their marketing is based around luxury, performance and history. Engineering is at the back of the bus these days.
Except the worse fuel economy and $5000 DPF.
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Originally Posted by TheHysteric
Engineering is at the back of the bus these days.
And, again, the lack of rebuildablity is a red herring, as pretty much ZERO gasoline engines can be either. You're talking about the realm of industrial engines that has ZERO relevance to today's automobiles. Sorry, but light weight is a virtue.
Perhaps those looking for knowledge here rather than a platform to denigrate the world of Mercedes may find some value in ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_particulate_filter
Last edited by lkchris; 12-05-2010 at 07:18 PM.
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2006 E320 CDi, 2008 3/4 Ton Suburban, 2007 "rice rickshaw" Accord 5 speed
Yet, General Motors determined it couldn't live without its German engineers.
And, again, the lack of rebuildablity is a red herring, as pretty much ZERO gasoline engines can be either. You're talking about the realm of industrial engines that has ZERO relevance to today's automobiles. Sorry, but light weight is a virtue.
Perhaps those looking for knowledge here rather than a platform to denigrate the world of Mercedes may find some value in ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_particulate_filter
And, again, the lack of rebuildablity is a red herring, as pretty much ZERO gasoline engines can be either. You're talking about the realm of industrial engines that has ZERO relevance to today's automobiles. Sorry, but light weight is a virtue.
Perhaps those looking for knowledge here rather than a platform to denigrate the world of Mercedes may find some value in ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_particulate_filter
1) Rebuildability of modern engines. 240 is right in pointing out that new passenger car engines are more and more "throw away" in their designs. Using MB as an example there are still lots of MB passenger diesel cars running on the road these days all over the world with amazing mileage, a lot of them taxis. Think of the resources and energy saved if these cars were junked instead of being rebuilt.
2) When cats were installed in 1971 or so it was the cure-all for air-pollution. The standards were tightened every few years, to the LEV and eventually the ULEV and soon zero emission vehicles. Like cigarette smoking the real and ultimate goal is the killing of the diesel and the gasoline engines. Unfortunately Ralph Nader and Alfonso (Ozone Man) Gore and disciples are very much alive and well.
3) The "virtue" of lightweight cars. There is none apart from fuel conservation. From the US governemnt's own research data passengers travelling in heavy vehicles survive much better in crashes with lighter cars. This is common sense needing no confirmation. If you try to hit me head-on when I am driving in my 3/4 ton Suburban with your mini or Mercedes Smart car you will end up somewhere under my rear axle, all squashed up in the process. If you can afford it drive the biggest and safest car always. Try shutting the doors of a MB 560 SEL (I owned one), the 1992 S500 with the double-glazed glass (I drove one) and feel the difference. The modern MB cars are tinny by comparison. Audi and BMW are using aluminum extensively to save weight. Have you ever priced the cost of a paint job on a 100% aluminum body Audi A8? Colossal. My brother drove one.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2006 E320 CDi, 2008 3/4 Ton Suburban, 2007 "rice rickshaw" Accord 5 speed
However, I do know that you have to buy one just when your car is worth less then the cost of a PDF, after the MB warranty expires.
Are you going to buy a new replacement PDF or cut it off and re-program the computer? The choice is easy and obvious to most.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
2006 E320 CDi, 2008 3/4 Ton Suburban, 2007 "rice rickshaw" Accord 5 speed
Stay away from any mercedes diesel beyond the 06 CDI with the straight 6. From 2007 until today, the V-6 diesel engines are throw away. The US EPA has destroyed the once reliable workhorse of years ago - the diesel engine of today is so burdened with stringent emission controls that you can guarantee routine shop visits to fix all the check engine lights that will plague the owner for years to come. Urea injection and particulate filters are regulatory requirements beyond the technology to build any reliability into these engines.
Older (pre 2006) MB diesels are workhorses alright. Change the oil, fuel filter, transmission and axle fluids and you are done. The less emission junk there is on the engine the less there is to go wrong. Remember ALL emission equipment on the modern engine was designed neither for performance enhancement nor better fuel economy and therefore add nothing of value to the vehicle. The EPA had the brilliant idea of forcing car makers to do this Check Engine Light (CEL) thing for all emission equipment failures, to scare motorists into fixing their cars. Now they had forced MB to do the 50 start thing with the AdBlue diesels. When your urine solution runs dry you don't drive. What a joke! Would you like to be stranded in the middle of nowhere because of a stupid piece of emission equipment?
#14
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
And, again, the lack of rebuildablity is a red herring, as pretty much ZERO gasoline engines can be either.
You're talking about the realm of industrial engines that has ZERO relevance to today's automobiles.
Perhaps those looking for knowledge here rather than a platform to denigrate the world of Mercedes may find some value in
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
You guys can keep bashing the bluetec that I have, but I think I'll be fine. I'm willing to pay for repairs or do them myself. If my DPF costs 2K every 100K miles, I think I can cope. Additionally, if my engine is reliable and scalable enough to be used in trucks around the world, I think it can't be as worthless as those who drive 30 year old taxis may attest. Considering my car is paid off, if I have to spend 3-5K in one year a few years down the line to keep it up and running circles around 99 SL500's while getting 36MPG highway, I think I'll be able to deal with it..
#17
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Great, people like the Tribeca lookalike.
It isn't. The biggest its used in is cargo vans with a 11300lb GVWR.
If you're going to troll, please try and get your facts correct. Otherwise people such as myself will continue to walk all over you.
Additionally, if my engine is reliable and scalable enough to be used in trucks around the world
If you're going to troll, please try and get your facts correct. Otherwise people such as myself will continue to walk all over you.
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
You are playing with words again . 2.1 ton truck or van , what is the difference. He made his point.
#19
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Whats the difference? Work ability. Look at an actual truck of similar size, such as an Isuzu NPR, and their rating is above 20,000lbs, double that of the sprinter.
#20
Caveat emptor
Drove a 2010 R-class BlueTec this weekend. It was impressive. After reading this thread I must say it is crossed off my list. As a long-time Mercedes owner, the non-rebuildable feature of this engine is totally unacceptable to me. Replacement long blocks from Mercedes have never been cheap, but I can only imagine what they will charge, given that they know there is no other option. Aluminum is intolerant to overheating, so a bad radiator hose and inattentive driver may render a $18k R-class diesel worthless. I can buy a lot of gas for my Suburban to avoid that risk.
In the past I always bought Mercedes that were at least 10 years old, because that was what I could afford. That practice allowed me to side-step a lot of problems, e.g. the bad wiring harnesses in the 90s, transmissions that lasted 85k because they told us not to change the fluid, etc. Now that can afford a new one, I will continue that policy, because I cannot trust the engineering of an untested Mercedes.
Thanks to all who posted on this thread, given resources like this forum we can all learn from the experience of others.
Caveat emptor
In the past I always bought Mercedes that were at least 10 years old, because that was what I could afford. That practice allowed me to side-step a lot of problems, e.g. the bad wiring harnesses in the 90s, transmissions that lasted 85k because they told us not to change the fluid, etc. Now that can afford a new one, I will continue that policy, because I cannot trust the engineering of an untested Mercedes.
Thanks to all who posted on this thread, given resources like this forum we can all learn from the experience of others.
Caveat emptor
Last edited by miller1952; 01-17-2011 at 11:44 AM.
#21
Senior Member
Unfortunately I agree with you totally.
Older (pre 2006) MB diesels are workhorses alright. Change the oil, fuel filter, transmission and axle fluids and you are done. The less emission junk there is on the engine the less there is to go wrong. Remember ALL emission equipment on the modern engine was designed neither for performance enhancement nor better fuel economy and therefore add nothing of value to the vehicle. The EPA had the brilliant idea of forcing car makers to do this Check Engine Light (CEL) thing for all emission equipment failures, to scare motorists into fixing their cars. Now they had forced MB to do the 50 start thing with the AdBlue diesels. When your urine solution runs dry you don't drive. What a joke! Would you like to be stranded in the middle of nowhere because of a stupid piece of emission equipment?
Older (pre 2006) MB diesels are workhorses alright. Change the oil, fuel filter, transmission and axle fluids and you are done. The less emission junk there is on the engine the less there is to go wrong. Remember ALL emission equipment on the modern engine was designed neither for performance enhancement nor better fuel economy and therefore add nothing of value to the vehicle. The EPA had the brilliant idea of forcing car makers to do this Check Engine Light (CEL) thing for all emission equipment failures, to scare motorists into fixing their cars. Now they had forced MB to do the 50 start thing with the AdBlue diesels. When your urine solution runs dry you don't drive. What a joke! Would you like to be stranded in the middle of nowhere because of a stupid piece of emission equipment?
Last edited by zemun1234; 01-17-2011 at 01:20 PM.
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
#23
Us USAians can certainly engineer. I'd put MIT grads up against Max Planck alumni any day.
UMich grads, however...
In my experience, most every company, regardless of product or business model, always sees R&D as a cost center/rent extraction, and wants to hire the cheapest they can get, then lay them off ASAP. That's why they prefer overseas folks who rely on their employers for visa sponsorship.
Used to have a UMich grad for a boss. One day, he complained about me being unable to work late because I was taking a class for my MS: "I never went to most of my classes at UMich, and I still got A's..." It showed.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
USA companies have to pay their assembly labor so much they have to cut back on materials and engineering quality to still compete at common price points.
#25
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
The iron cylinder liners are cast into the aluminum cylinder block and no press in sleeves are available. That means once the cylinder bore is damaged or excessively worn, the block (aka, the engine) is scrap metal. That, by definition, means the engine is not rebuildable.
The entire engine is filled with integrated parts that, if damaged or worn, require many other components to be replaced with it.
The valvecovers are integral and machined to match to the cylinder head. That means if a valvecover is damaged the entire cylinder head must be replaced.
The turbo is not sold as individual parts. That means if the electronic actuator fails (as they frequently do) the entire turbo must be purchased.
If any of the piston cooling jets in the block are so much as bent, the block is scrap metal (Per MB).
So on and so on. The entire V6 is based around minimal manufacturing costs; not reliability, ease of repairs or longevity.