Diesel Forum Forum for Diesel engine vehicle related discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Firsthand issues with new V6 bluetec motor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-07-2011, 12:29 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
edd1e22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 147
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 G500
Firsthand issues with new V6 bluetec motor?

There has been quite a bit of speculation here about the possible unreliability of the V6 vs the I6. Has anyone here actually experienced FIRSTHAND any issues with their V6?

The motor is now four years old in the states and six years over in Europe so some issues should be coming up already.

I'm trying to make the decision between a 2007 E320 Bluetec vs the 2006 E320 CDI and have only found speculation about the issues of cast iron sleeves within the aluminum block.
Old 02-07-2011, 09:44 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
dgiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 898
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
His 2019 RAM Cummins Turbo Diesel Laramie; Her's 2007 ML320 CDI P3; Mine BMW R1200R
I have 86000 miles on my 2007 CDI. Will let you know. Stand by for a few years.
I think you will find that the differences will boil down to whether you prefer using Adblue or run flat tires.
Old 02-08-2011, 01:56 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
edd1e22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 147
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 G500
07-09 w211 didn't have adblue/runflats
Old 02-08-2011, 08:49 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
zemun1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 309
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2005 E320 CDI (sold); 2007 R320 CDI (sold); 2008 ML320 CDI; 2014 ML350 Bluetec
Originally Posted by edd1e22
There has been quite a bit of speculation here about the possible unreliability of the V6 vs the I6. Has anyone here actually experienced FIRSTHAND any issues with their V6?

The motor is now four years old in the states and six years over in Europe so some issues should be coming up already.

I'm trying to make the decision between a 2007 E320 Bluetec vs the 2006 E320 CDI and have only found speculation about the issues of cast iron sleeves within the aluminum block.
I used to drive 2005 E320 CDI and (2007 R320 + 2008 ML320) ...If you ask me, I prefer more I5 (don't forget I drive V6) ...It's much easier to maintenance and I trust more iron than aluminum

I sold my E320 CDI ONLY due to I couldn't drive any more in cold, a lot of snow climate ...
Old 02-08-2011, 03:36 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ImInPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
2012 S350 Bluetec 4Matic, Diamond White, P2
Originally Posted by edd1e22
There has been quite a bit of speculation here about the possible unreliability of the V6 vs the I6. Has anyone here actually experienced FIRSTHAND any issues with their V6?

The motor is now four years old in the states and six years over in Europe so some issues should be coming up already.

I'm trying to make the decision between a 2007 E320 Bluetec vs the 2006 E320 CDI and have only found speculation about the issues of cast iron sleeves within the aluminum block.
I think you answered your own quest. There is a LOT of speculation. The V6 diesels have been out long enought that if there was any symptomatic issues they would certainly be revealed by now. Buy the one that makes you smile, drive it like you stole it, and at 300K miles, let us know how you are doing.
Old 02-08-2011, 05:47 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
edd1e22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 147
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2005 G500
Yeah I figured as much. There is so much speculation regarding the cast iron sleeves/aluminum combo but no one has actually had any issues. MBZ knows their stuff when it comes to diesel but everyone builds a lemon(M271).
Old 02-08-2011, 11:08 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 1 hours drive north of Sydney Australia
Posts: 3,714
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
2007 W204 220CDI Classic Sedan
I have not had any issues with 30 year old petrol Peugeot wet sleaves . Still original. No leaks after 450,000 km. Cast liners , cast block & alloy head.

The secret is regular coolant changes ,regular oil services & driving within their capabilities.
Old 02-10-2011, 08:23 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by edd1e22
There is so much speculation regarding the cast iron sleeves/aluminum combo but no one has actually had any issues.
There is no speculation about problems, the known fact is that its scrap metal IF it develops a problem.
Old 02-10-2011, 02:55 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
dgiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 898
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
His 2019 RAM Cummins Turbo Diesel Laramie; Her's 2007 ML320 CDI P3; Mine BMW R1200R
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
There is no speculation about problems, the known fact is that its scrap metal IF it develops a problem.
In this day and age with todays evolving technology, and time is more valuable, no one really is into rebuilding motors. "IF" my ML's diesel engine for some far fetched reason blows the motor, I will just head to a MB dealer and drive a new one home. I am "handy" and I used to be a VW/Audi tech a long time ago, but there is no way I will waste my time and money rebuilding, when there are brand new ones with newer technologies and new warranties waiting for me.
Iron block, aluminium block, who cares. Just drive the Benz and watch the miles roll by.
By the way, my goal on this ML is 500,000 miles.
414,000 more miles to go!!!!!
Old 02-11-2011, 11:22 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jctevere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dix Hills, New York
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2012 C250 Coupe
Here is a quote from a newsletter I got on my OM603.97 engine:

"Another provocative issue deals with cylinder sleeves. Sleeves refer to the metal ‘tubes’ sometimes used to line the cylinder walls. Cylinder sleeves are most often used to provide a longer wearing lining made of a more wear-resistant material such as cast iron in an engine block that is cast from a lighter weight material such as aluminum where the friction of the moving piston would wear out the relatively soft aluminum.

What is tremendously interesting here is that when this 3.5 liter engine first went into production Mercedes determined that in the event the engine was ever to need rebuilding, the installation of cylinder sleeves “is not permissable.” (Source: 602/603 Service Manual). There is nothing necessarily troubling about this position; it simply most likely reflects an engineering analysis by Mercedes that installation of cylinder sleeves, which requires the boring out of the cylinder to a diameter sufficient to accept the outside diameter of the sleeve (here, from 89.0 mm to 92.5 mm) risked damage to coolant or lubrication passages, the wall between adjacent cylinders, or anyplace in the engine block immediately adjacent to the cylinder where insufficient material might be left.

However, after this engine was in production Mercedes did an ‘about face’ on this issue, advising in Technical Service Bulletin 01/32, issued in August 1994 on how to install cylinder sleeves in any 603 engine, including the 603.97x. “In the event of an engine rebuild, cylinder sleeves may be subsequently installed in these engines.”"

I dunno about you, but that doesn't sound like it becomes scrap metal...

I don't get why you are so hard pressed against the new engines for not using cylinder liners.

Last edited by jctevere; 02-11-2011 at 11:25 AM.
Old 02-11-2011, 09:30 PM
  #11  
Newbie
 
cannonec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 E320 Bluetec
2008 Bluetec

I have 08 E320 Bluetec, 42k mi, no issues or major complaints.
No adblue system.
I agree that is does not drive well in snow conditions, whether it's the E chassis or choice of tires (Kuhmo Ecsta LX platinum, have over 37k on them now -very usual for this tire class).
I ditched the orig Michelin's because they were loud, and really sucked in the rain - online reviews agreed with these observations.
Old 02-11-2011, 10:12 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tbal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: BC
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Haters crazy
09 ml320 bluetec... no issues what so ever, runs like a champ
Old 02-26-2011, 09:29 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DubVBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,202
Received 188 Likes on 131 Posts
W212 M276 DELA 30 ; W211 OM642 ; R107 M117, Sierra 1500 LZ0
07 Bluetec with 42K on it. The only problems I've had are not related to the drivetrain. I also have a KD-Box and like to floor the car a few times every 45 miles (daily commute).
Old 02-26-2011, 11:43 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by dgiturbo
and time is more valuable
Wrong. The average worker's cost remains the same as it was decades ago. The difference is inflation, which is why the average worker earns significantly more than decades ago.

no one really is into rebuilding motors.
Except people who care about the environment and a vehicle's useful lifespan.

"IF" my ML's diesel engine for some far fetched reason blows the motor, I will just head to a MB dealer and drive a new one home.
Thus perpetuating America's (well deserved) reputation as resource hogs.

By the way, my goal on this ML is 500,000 miles
You won't see it. The service rating for that engine is only half that. Go check the figures of commercial vehicles using it.

I dunno about you, but that doesn't sound like it becomes scrap metal...
That would be accurate, IF we were talking about that engine.
Old 03-03-2011, 09:42 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
dgiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Woodstock, IL
Posts: 898
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
His 2019 RAM Cummins Turbo Diesel Laramie; Her's 2007 ML320 CDI P3; Mine BMW R1200R
Originally Posted by 240D 3.0T
Wrong. The average worker's cost remains the same as it was decades ago. The difference is inflation, which is why the average worker earns significantly more than decades ago.

Except people who care about the environment and a vehicle's useful lifespan.

Thus perpetuating America's (well deserved) reputation as resource hogs.

You won't see it. The service rating for that engine is only half that. Go check the figures of commercial vehicles using it.

[/B]
1) Sorry, workers cost is the same, but wages are higher due to inflation? Where do you come up with this stuff?
2) Which is why I drive a modern computerized Clean Diesel as opposed to that classic you drive?
3) Really?? Have you been to China recently?? I have. Don't confuse "resource hog" with affluence. I tend to keep what I buy unless technology improvements are worthwhile.
4) Why? I will just drive it myself and find out. Commercial vehicles usually aren't driven by the owners.
Old 03-06-2011, 04:32 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
240D 3.0T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Federal Heights, CO
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1982 300D VNT, 1980 240D 3.0T, 1982 300TD
Originally Posted by dgiturbo
1) Sorry, workers cost is the same, but wages are higher due to inflation? Where do you come up with this stuff?
The US government's census.

Which is why I drive a modern computerized Clean Diesel as opposed to that classic you drive?
Correct. Its far cleaner to the environment to maintain an old vehicle in good condition than buy a new one.

Don't confuse "resource hog" with affluence.
There is no difference between the two.

Commercial vehicles usually aren't driven by the owners.
However, they are better maintained.
Old 03-11-2011, 10:27 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DubVBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,202
Received 188 Likes on 131 Posts
W212 M276 DELA 30 ; W211 OM642 ; R107 M117, Sierra 1500 LZ0
Just saw that the bluetec motor is now being offered in the G-class with a curb weight around a ton more than an e320. Mercedes sure is putting an awful lot of stock in such a ****ty motor.
Old 03-13-2011, 06:35 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Zedd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300SDL
Yes. They designed the engine to fit in as many models as possible.

FYI, The GL is not a G class, its a Subaru Tribeca ripoff.
Old 03-13-2011, 08:19 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DubVBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,202
Received 188 Likes on 131 Posts
W212 M276 DELA 30 ; W211 OM642 ; R107 M117, Sierra 1500 LZ0
I know the difference between a GL and a G.

It's also in the G class. So it's in the following models now: C, E,S,CLS,ML,GL, G and Sprinter.

http://www.topspeed.com/cars/mercede...c-ar85698.html

That's a lot of trust for such a piece of crap motor. Let's be honest here, mercedes has put out one truly crappy diesel engine in the last 30 years, and that was the 6 cylinder they used in the 350SDL and S350 D in the late 80s and early 90s. They used that engine for a very brief period. Once the problems were obvious, it was gone. The V6 has been around since about 2003. It's only been in the states since 07, but I haven't read of any engine related problems on any forum. I'd say it's biggest problems are compactness (turbo in the V) which makes routine maintenance more tedious.

BTW, I used to have an 84 300SD for about 6 years, so I'm fairly familiar with their diesel offerings.
Old 04-04-2011, 06:44 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
Hu99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 ml350 Bluetec
Originally Posted by Zedd
Yes. They designed the engine to fit in as many models as possible.

FYI, The GL is not a G class, its a Subaru Tribeca ripoff.
Put down the crack pipe and seek professional help.
Old 04-05-2011, 07:21 PM
  #21  
Super Member
 
sunny_j's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver British Columbia
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
09 E320 Bluetec
09 e320 no adblue, 26,8xxkm, kd box & i drive the car hard with no issues
Old 04-08-2011, 01:54 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lkchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 6,050
Received 198 Likes on 177 Posts
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550
Hardly any issues reported with the V6 (OM642).

With the OM648 (inline 6) there are injector, glow plug, and EGR issues reported with some frequency on the forums.

Our 2006 got one new injector while still under warranty and the dealer billed MBUSA $750 for the part.

Inherent with the V6 is the 7-speed transmission, and it could bring more issues than the 5-speed attached to the OM648 and for sure the engine.

The "cylinder sleeve" thing is a red herring--none of the gasoline engines can be sleeved either. NOBODY NOBODY NOBODY buys cars these days expecting to run them forever and therefor nobody sells them. These are high performance Autobahn burners, not trucks.
Old 04-22-2011, 06:19 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
Pierre Louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Savannah
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2011 BMW 335d Sport Package
Originally Posted by lkchris
...NOBODY NOBODY NOBODY buys cars these days expecting to run them forever and therefor nobody sells them. These are high performance Autobahn burners, not trucks.
Uh, and you have STRONG STRONG STRONG data to support your speculation. Would love to hear about it.

PL
Old 04-23-2011, 12:05 AM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 1 hours drive north of Sydney Australia
Posts: 3,714
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
2007 W204 220CDI Classic Sedan
A 2005 W203 220CDI in Israel just passed 500,000 km with no mechanical problems. Just a computer fault.
Old 05-02-2011, 07:53 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
pinebaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Blaine, WA
Posts: 1,240
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
07 E320 Bluetec
Definitely a winner. 2007 Bluetec, 26,500 miles, KD-Box, I drive hard and zero problems.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Firsthand issues with new V6 bluetec motor?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.