E-Class (W124) 1984-1995: E 260, E 300, E 320, E 420, E 500 (Includes CE, T, TD models)

Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 9 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 11-27-2011, 11:38 PM
  #951  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Nevermind, housemate got a 2007 CLS63, black on black, P2 package + AMG Development package.

I have to quite humbly say that he has the most amazing car in the driveway by far.
Old 11-27-2011, 11:55 PM
  #952  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
However, I think El Bucko has had quite the recovery after 6 or so months in surgery. Not quite done yet, but here is my latest progress report

All comments, criticisms, etc welcome. I still have plans, this is but one step closer to realizing my final vision for Bucky.

Also, the H&R Sports + Koni Yellows (4/5 firmness) with the upgraded swaybars has yielded a carfeel like nothing else. This car is now. It still feels like the 3600lb beast it is (especially after becoming used to the nimble feel of the c280 Sport) but it is direct, with almost no roll & lean, and just feels glued to the road.
Attached Thumbnails Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?-dscf0018-medium-.jpg   Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?-dscf0019-medium-.jpg   Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?-dscf0020-medium-.jpg   Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?-dscf0021-medium-.jpg   Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?-dscf0022-medium-.jpg  

Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?-dscf0023-medium-.jpg  
Old 11-28-2011, 12:42 AM
  #953  
Super Member
 
stormtigers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
88 W124 300CE
Originally Posted by Saijin_Naib
However, I think El Bucko has had quite the recovery after 6 or so months in surgery. Not quite done yet, but here is my latest progress report

All comments, criticisms, etc welcome. I still have plans, this is but one step closer to realizing my final vision for Bucky.

Also, the H&R Sports + Koni Yellows (4/5 firmness) with the upgraded swaybars has yielded a carfeel like nothing else. This car is now. It still feels like the 3600lb beast it is (especially after becoming used to the nimble feel of the c280 Sport) but it is direct, with almost no roll & lean, and just feels glued to the road.
How do you whistle on this thing ?

BUCKY really looking the goods mate ! (that Oz slang for looking fantastic)
Love what you've done - looks like he is fresh off the car lot !
Interesting detail on the qwheels how/what did you do to them.
They appear bronze/gold centre on silver rims.

Anyway that's is no doubt a beautiful car my friend !



EDIT : OH PS I'll shoot you of you put roof racks on it !
Old 11-28-2011, 01:19 AM
  #954  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Originally Posted by stormtigers
How do you whistle on this thing ?
Because the whistles got a little woo woooo.
Originally Posted by stormtigers
BUCKY really looking the goods mate ! (that Oz slang for looking fantastic)
Love what you've done - looks like he is fresh off the car lot !
Interesting detail on the qwheels how/what did you do to them.
They appear bronze/gold centre on silver rims.
Anyway that's is no doubt a beautiful car my friend !
Thanks man! It needs much more attention, IE AMG kit and ducktail but that is much later down the road :P Thanks, Dmitry did an amazing job rehabing the paint and fixing my rust and various dings and other imperfections.

My idea was to simply paint the whole wheel the color my hematite trim faded to from Black/Silver to this very sublime bronze. He disagreed, then called my Dad on Saturday simply saying "Don't worry, I've got it under control. Pick it up tomorrow." He decided to do the bronze over a polished lip look and I think its fantastic. I'll be changing out the center caps for the MB Laurel style caps as I think the blue will offset the bronze quite nicely. That is actually my father's idea, I can't take credit for it
Originally Posted by stormtigers
EDIT : OH PS I'll shoot you of you put roof racks on it !
You can shoot me after I find a set, I still need some hauling capacity with this car, we got rid of all our SUVs so its either roof racks or a trailer hitch or both. Bucky will need to branch out into CUV territory (Coupe Utility Vehicle)
Old 11-28-2011, 06:13 AM
  #955  
RHW
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RHW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North NJ
Posts: 1,246
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
94 Wagon and 94 Cabriolet
Wow, project appears quite successful, the body looks sharp, the wheels look...really incredible. A great idea that I'd avoid for the gamble. Dmitri is either lucky or good.

I'd consider adding a bump to front and reducing a bit in rear, no?

It is always an experience to "refresh" the suspension on such an older car, the ride comes back or in your case, the ride is better than Bucky offered when new.

I still might delete headlight washer arms, and body match the grill too.

Are you color matched? Hard to tell from pics, I think not. On my 92 sportline, I painted the black bumper strip to match the lower cladding, it looked more modern I thought.

Every time I do a significant upgrade, I tend to want to enjoy it more than do more stuff..but you asked.
Old 11-28-2011, 11:01 AM
  #956  
Super Member
 
stormtigers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
88 W124 300CE
And Saijin, spoiler, honestly. you have a classy colour.

I think a little bib spoiler on the trunk rather than something large.
Similar to the Zender bib I want to put on mine - just enough to stand out, not enough to insult the overall shape !

Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?-rear-spoiler-003.jpg
Old 11-28-2011, 11:30 AM
  #957  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Originally Posted by RHW
Wow, project appears quite successful, the body looks sharp, the wheels look...really incredible. A great idea that I'd avoid for the gamble. Dmitri is either lucky or good.
Thanks Rich! Dmitry is excellent at what he does. He has been the one that has done all the cosmetic modwork that my car has had done over the past years including fitting the STI Vortex Generator, making my wiper panel inserts, etc. He is meticulous and has a great eye for design. Also, as I learned this time, if you get him excited enough he'll start throwing out his own ideas and you'll end up with something better than what you even had in mind.
Originally Posted by RHW
I'd consider adding a bump to front and reducing a bit in rear, no?
It is always an experience to "refresh" the suspension on such an older car, the ride comes back or in your case, the ride is better than Bucky offered when new.
I kept the stock bump pads as I had no clue how the car would sit, but yes, I think I may have to go 4/8mm or so up on the fronts maybe. I'm going to keep the back is or lower 4mm max as I really want to keep the front->rear rake of the car's suspension setup. I think that little touch lends the c124 a bit more aggression than a 100% flat stance.
Originally Posted by RHW
I still might delete headlight washer arms, and body match the grill too.
Are you color matched? Hard to tell from pics, I think not. On my 92 sportline, I painted the black bumper strip to match the lower cladding, it looked more modern I thought.
Every time I do a significant upgrade, I tend to want to enjoy it more than do more stuff..but you asked.
For the most part, I'm really not fond of full on colormatching components. I like the contrast of the various chrome and black elements to the burgundy and bronze. I think a colormatched grille would lose most of its impact and just look kinda blah on the front. The wiper arms will be functional as soon as I find a set of motors that work. This new set I got hasn't worked since day 1, but what can you do. Cladding is not color matched, but its such a minor difference in tone (darker than top) that I truly don't mind. Again, I like the contrast it provides. The car doesn't have aggressive lines that low on the body, so having a color shift helps provide more visual impact. I enjoyed it yesterday, I'll enjoy it today, but tomorrow, tomorrow I start anew
Originally Posted by stormtigers
And Saijin, spoiler, honestly. you have a classy colour.
I think a little bib spoiler on the trunk rather than something large.
Similar to the Zender bib I want to put on mine - just enough to stand out, not enough to insult the overall shape !
Attachment 223084
Thanks Stormy, I agree. I know I was a bit rice with the AMG wing, but I just love the shape of those and I was going to have it cut in half height-wise so it would have been just over the decklid. It would have been borderline perfect. Lip spoilers are nice, but I don't think they provide enough oomph to make up for the unapologetically plain lines of the truck on the c124. Both Dmitry and my father are fans of the ducktail and I have approval/recommendations from both to go track one down. Previously I was not fond of them as I thought you HAD to debadge and lose the car and star, but I saw a member on here who had his ducktail with car and star badges and that clinched it for me. I will unfortunately have to have the AMG filled on the spoiler as there isn't an AMG bit on the car :C
Old 11-28-2011, 08:50 PM
  #958  
Super Member
 
AMGDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boise, ID, USA
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
300D, 500E, E420
Based on the photos, I'd go up 2 bumps in the front, and see if that even does anything. It's possible the car is sitting on the strut shaft stop buffers, and if so, thicker spring pads may not change anything. This would also be why it feels glued to the road. The rake will also skew the weight balance even more to the front, and these cars are already front-heavy.

Have you measured the ride height, front & rear, from wheel center to bottom of the fender lip? When you do this, note the amount of fuel in the tank, as the rear ride height will vary about 0.5" between full tank & empty tank. Any idea what pads were on the car stock?

Looks sharp though! Any news on the engine performance issues? Get your 0-60 down to factory specs yet?


Old 11-28-2011, 08:51 PM
  #959  
Senior Member
 
chlippo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
300E W124, 300E W124 3.4 AMG, Audi S3 2002
Ducktail rocks! no other thing can match a ducktail, its even a lot better in person than in pictures!

Good to see bucky back!

now tell us whats up with the performance after the engine refresh and you were experiencing a lack of power low down...what went with that?
Old 11-29-2011, 12:37 AM
  #960  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Originally Posted by AMGDave
Based on the photos, I'd go up 2 bumps in the front, and see if that even does anything. It's possible the car is sitting on the strut shaft stop buffers, and if so, thicker spring pads may not change anything. This would also be why it feels glued to the road. The rake will also skew the weight balance even more to the front, and these cars are already front-heavy.
Hm, okay. I was thinking of going to the 12mm for the fronts as that would at most give me back about .7in or so of ride height. The wheels are quite tucked in the fenders. No rubbing yet, but its certainly possible.
Originally Posted by AMGDave
Have you measured the ride height, front & rear, from wheel center to bottom of the fender lip? When you do this, note the amount of fuel in the tank, as the rear ride height will vary about 0.5" between full tank & empty tank. Any idea what pads were on the car stock?
No, not yet. I'll try and do this when I can find a level surface. No idea what stock pads were on there, they didn't get refreshed like I wanted them to.
Originally Posted by AMGDave
Looks sharp though! Any news on the engine performance issues? Get your 0-60 down to factory specs yet?
Thanks! No, no 0-60 runs yet. I will say that I doubt its any faster than 12s 0-60. So maybe a slight improvement but still a dog.
Originally Posted by chlippo
Ducktail rocks! no other thing can match a ducktail, its even a lot better in person than in pictures!
Good to see bucky back!
now tell us whats up with the performance after the engine refresh and you were experiencing a lack of power low down...what went with that?
Thanks man Yeah, I do like the ducktail, especially if I can keep my badging No firm numbers for engine performance, buttmeter says still slow as ****.
Old 11-29-2011, 12:44 AM
  #961  
Super Member
 
whipplem104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
Looks good but I agree with Dave. You are sitting or close to sitting on the bump stops on the shocks. If you want to be close to that low you will need to put the 129 upper shock mounts on.
Old 11-29-2011, 12:52 AM
  #962  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Originally Posted by whipplem104
Looks good but I agree with Dave. You are sitting or close to sitting on the bump stops on the shocks. If you want to be close to that low you will need to put the 129 upper shock mounts on.
Thanks man. What do you mean by the r129 uppers? Is that in conjunction with larger spring perch pads, or is that by its self?
Old 12-01-2011, 02:07 AM
  #963  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Thought you'd all like to see the horrific state my suspension geometry was in post-lower and the two alignment sheets
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Before.pdf (97.7 KB, 466 views)
File Type: pdf
After.pdf (101.6 KB, 408 views)
Old 12-01-2011, 01:53 PM
  #964  
Junior Member
 
teezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300ce
looks like both sheets are after springs installed, since no change in camber front and rear

should handle well but going to be hard on tire tread life till you get the negative camber values down on both ends

here are amg specs on a 300e which should be pretty close to the coupe

Front suspension
-camber -0 degree 45'
-caster 10 degrees 10' (straight ahead position)
-toe-in 0 degree 20'

Rear Suspension
-camber -1 degree
-toe-in is 0 degree 20'

these came from this link
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/...300ce-amg.html
Old 12-01-2011, 02:02 PM
  #965  
Junior Member
 
teezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300ce
car looks great

always been on the fence with the side pinstripes

with the stripes, they create a panel look on the side, braking up the styling

without the stripes, they let the styling sweep to the roof as i think was the intention, much cleaner

btw ~~~ i believe all the pinstriping was aftermarket and not factory applied, just another dealer money maker
Old 12-01-2011, 04:52 PM
  #966  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Originally Posted by teezer
looks like both sheets are after springs installed, since no change in camber front and rear

should handle well but going to be hard on tire tread life till you get the negative camber values down on both ends

here are amg specs on a 300e which should be pretty close to the coupe

Front suspension
-camber -0 degree 45'
-caster 10 degrees 10' (straight ahead position)
-toe-in 0 degree 20'

Rear Suspension
-camber -1 degree
-toe-in is 0 degree 20'

these came from this link
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/...300ce-amg.html
Yeah, both sheets are post-install, just before and after alignment. A lot of the measurements were way out of spec, though the new measurements are much closer to what they should be when compared to a w124 Sportline (what spec they used to align off of). I'll have to look into getting the shortened rear links and maybe adjustable front towers or seeing if using the r129 Strut Towers will help the camber issue by unlowering it a bit.

Originally Posted by teezer
car looks great
always been on the fence with the side pinstripes
with the stripes, they create a panel look on the side, braking up the styling
without the stripes, they let the styling sweep to the roof as i think was the intention, much cleaner
btw ~~~ i believe all the pinstriping was aftermarket and not factory applied, just another dealer money maker
Yeah, the stripes were done at the dealer in 90 by Paintwerks by Jeff, a pinstriper that did a ton of work out of the dealership the car was purchased from.

I don't mind the pinstripes, they've been on the car since I've first seen it so I've grown rather accustomed to them. But I see what you're saying about it splitting the side profile up.
Old 12-02-2011, 11:29 AM
  #967  
Super Member
 
AMGDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boise, ID, USA
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
300D, 500E, E420
If you're interested in the shortened rear LCA's for camber correction, there's a group buy in the works at 500Eboard.com for the RDM TEK units (which are out of production, but the mfr will build 10 pairs at a time on special order). These will reduce rear camber approx 1.25°, so if you are a -2.25° now, it would change to approx -1.00°. Also keep in mind that rear camber is a function of ride height, so if you change the spring pads, the camber will change too... and this will also require the rear toe to be adjusted.

Old 12-02-2011, 12:20 PM
  #968  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
I think I have no choice but to get in on that Dave. Would you mind PMing me the relevant info? I hope they're not too expensive, I'm already tapped out from having the car rebuilt :C

Do you have any further info about what whipplem104 said above?

Thanks!
Old 12-02-2011, 01:18 PM
  #969  
Super Member
 
AMGDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boise, ID, USA
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
300D, 500E, E420
Email sent about the rear camber correction kits - let me know if you didn't receive it.

I am not familiar with the R129 strut mount modification... but would like to know more about it. Note that if the front wheel is allowed to travel further upward, you may have rubbing issues between the tire and the inner fender liner or sheet metal. The R129 was originally designed for a lower ride height & wider wheels, but the W124 was not.

Got measurements on your ride height yet, btw? And have you checked to see if the front end is sitting on the stops as shown here? (It's hard to check this, as the car can't be jacked up to check... need a flashlight & something to lift the dust boot with so you can see what's going on in there.)
Old 12-02-2011, 01:49 PM
  #970  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Originally Posted by AMGDave
Email sent about the rear camber correction kits - let me know if you didn't receive it.

I am not familiar with the R129 strut mount modification... but would like to know more about it. Note that if the front wheel is allowed to travel further upward, you may have rubbing issues between the tire and the inner fender liner or sheet metal. The R129 was originally designed for a lower ride height & wider wheels, but the W124 was not.

Got measurements on your ride height yet, btw? And have you checked to see if the front end is sitting on the stops as shown here? (It's hard to check this, as the car can't be jacked up to check... need a flashlight & something to lift the dust boot with so you can see what's going on in there.)
Thanks for the email. They are pricey, but I guess I really don't have a choice if I want the car to drive properly. I think the r129 uppers will correct my front camber enough, though I honestly think it is close enough to be acceptable.

I'll check rideheight and the stops soon.
Old 12-02-2011, 02:04 PM
  #971  
Super Member
 
AMGDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boise, ID, USA
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
300D, 500E, E420
The R129 front strut mounts won't change camber at all, only suspension travel limits. If you want more camber adjustment up front, you'll have to try and score one of the RDM TEK adjustable strut mounts (were $499/pair when available new), but those are gone and not likely to ever be produced again. Your front camber didn't look bad, btw... I'd leave that alone since you autocross, and a tad more negative won't hurt.
Old 12-02-2011, 02:40 PM
  #972  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Originally Posted by AMGDave
The R129 front strut mounts won't change camber at all, only suspension travel limits. If you want more camber adjustment up front, you'll have to try and score one of the RDM TEK adjustable strut mounts (were $499/pair when available new), but those are gone and not likely to ever be produced again. Your front camber didn't look bad, btw... I'd leave that alone since you autocross, and a tad more negative won't hurt.
Ah, my mistake. Well, if its only travel then I may leave well enough alone or try to put a few more bumps up there. Honestly, I think the suspension travel is fine as-is. But I do need to check to be sure.

Rear might be an issue, though visually (I know it means nothing visually) the c280 Sport looks to be as negative in the rear as the 300ce, as does the 500e.
Old 12-05-2011, 10:21 AM
  #973  
Super Member
 
AMGDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boise, ID, USA
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
300D, 500E, E420
Originally Posted by Saijin_Naib
Rear might be an issue, though visually (I know it means nothing visually) the c280 Sport looks to be as negative in the rear as the 300ce, as does the 500e.
In stock form, rear camber is strictly a function of ride height. The 500E had the lowest ride height of any factory 124 and yes, it had the most negative camber. With stock wheels/tires, this is not a huge deal; however the wider yours rear wheels/tires are, the worse the problem becomes. I know a guy with a 500E who shredded a set of 275 rears (on 10.0 wheels) inside 3kmi. I'm guessing you have 205-225's on 7.5's in the back, in which case your -2.x° rear camber isn't awful, but if you notice accelerated wear on the inside edges of your rear tires, the only way to fix it is a camber correction kit. And the only one that doesn't have annoying drawbacks is the RDM TEK kit. Real shame they stopped selling 'em.

Old 12-18-2011, 02:13 PM
  #974  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
Front: about 12.5" from center to fender lip
Rear: about 13.5" from center to fender lip
-----------------------
Full tank of fuel, snow tires
Old 12-18-2011, 10:19 PM
  #975  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with you on colour matching the grille, keep it black for contrast.

I'd lose the stripes though, and raise the front just a little, leaving the rear as is.

Your car is looking like the dogs danglies.....


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 9 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Possible Modifications to 1991 300ce?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 PM.