spring pad discussion (no gay secks talk allowed)
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Dora the Explorer
So, at least for spring pads on the front suspension, you can pretty much assume that a 5mm change in spring pad will amount to approximately (due to possible error inherent to measuring a drawing) a 10mm of change in ride height.
If someone can measure these points on actual suspension parts, we'll get a more accurate number, if anyone cares that much about it.
Last edited by mgw_300e; Nov 7, 2006 at 02:54 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Dora the Explorer
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 3
From: Long Beach, Ca
lots of cars
No, their not the same because as you can see from these other post if you put the spring pad on the bottom it will raise the car more than if it was on top because mercedes springs are flat on one side and putting in the bottom wich is not the flat part will cause it to be uneven and higher on one side of the spring...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Dora the Explorer
No, their not the same because as you can see from these other post if you put the spring pad on the bottom it will raise the car more than if it was on top because mercedes springs are flat on one side and putting in the bottom wich is not the flat part will cause it to be uneven and higher on one side of the spring...
This thread rules - it's making everyone geek out!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
1990 300ce
I'm not telling anybody to install the spring pad on the top or bottom. Obviously if the spring pad was installed in the incorrect place, it would cause the ride hieght to be off since the spring is flat on the top vs. the bottom. I didn't go and look under my car before drawing this out. These aren't installation instructions, we're just trying to figure out the relationship between pad thickness and ride height.
I made a quick drawing to help illustrate this. But I disagree with you. The principle is the same- there is a multiplicative relationship between pad height and ride height. That's the principle, and it's the same regardless of whether the spring pad is on the top or bottom. Sure, if you took the old spring pad off the top and installed the new one on the bottom, it wouldn't drop the car as much as expected because it was installed wrong. But the mathematical principle is the same, assuming the pad is installed properly. jeeze. That will teach me to try and help.
I made a quick drawing to help illustrate this. But I disagree with you. The principle is the same- there is a multiplicative relationship between pad height and ride height. That's the principle, and it's the same regardless of whether the spring pad is on the top or bottom. Sure, if you took the old spring pad off the top and installed the new one on the bottom, it wouldn't drop the car as much as expected because it was installed wrong. But the mathematical principle is the same, assuming the pad is installed properly. jeeze. That will teach me to try and help.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 3
From: Long Beach, Ca
lots of cars
Dude i just said the spring pad goes on top not on the bottom!
If a new member looks at this thread they may think the spring pad goes on the bottom so i want to correct that...
Who is arguing that this is wrong? I think we all know that pad height and ride hight have to do with each other...
let's look at the spring pad sizes
8 +0 = 1 bump
8 + 5 = 13mm = 2 bump (5mm)
8 + 5 + 5 = 18mm = 3 bump (10mm)
8 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 23mm = 4 bump (15mm)
If you keep adding more thickness it will raise more than 5mm to start because of the angle of the lower control arm. It does matter where the spring is centered in the suspension because that would affect the ratio it raises or lowers the suspension from the pivot point.
So i don't see where we have a problem because the answer is YES your right..
These aren't installation instructions
there is a multiplicative relationship between pad height and ridsince the way the suspene height
let's look at the spring pad sizes
8 +0 = 1 bump
8 + 5 = 13mm = 2 bump (5mm)
8 + 5 + 5 = 18mm = 3 bump (10mm)
8 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 23mm = 4 bump (15mm)
If you keep adding more thickness it will raise more than 5mm to start because of the angle of the lower control arm. It does matter where the spring is centered in the suspension because that would affect the ratio it raises or lowers the suspension from the pivot point.
So i don't see where we have a problem because the answer is YES your right..
