Lower Control Arm Swap
Interestingly enough I have a friend who has a 95 E320 coupe and it DOES have the older style replaceable ball joints. Maybe these would work on the sedan. Anybody know??? Thanks
after your reply I consulted my own literature at home, and, I'm sorry to find out I was wrong and you were right, for the cars with an M104 and M119 engine the joint is welt into the arm. Pretty stupid. I could however not find any reason therefore, other than that the MB documents state "the lower arm assembly has been modified, and the ball joint cannot be individually removed" They dont say anything whether or not the whole geometry changed.
Brian
The reason was due to different brakes. The 4-piston front brakes that MB installed on cars with the M104 and M119 engines (specifically, the 294, 295, and 320mm diameter front brakes) have rotors which sit about 6mm closer to the control arm ball joint area. Since the air gap was only about 7mm and the dust shield occupies nearly 1mm of that, MB had to redesign the control arm to create more clearance. This meant changing to a compact ball joint design that unfortnately is not replaceable.
The good news is, usually by the time the ball joint is bad, the rubber bushings are shot also, so you get new bushings at the same time. The bad news is, the only aftermarket late-style LCA is made by Febi... and there have been a rash of reports in the past few months ball joint faliures after only a few thousand miles on the Febis. Check PeachParts and 500Eboard for details. The OE control arms cost twice as much as Febi but also won't fail a few months later.









