My E320 Loaner
I was surprised at how quick it felt. Pretty nice power, and overall pretty nimble. Felt a lot quicker than my C240 6 speed. Didn't handle as nice, though, and felt a little "loose" overall.
The seats were a horrible vinyl/fake leather. Really cheap looking. Uncomfortable, too. They manage to be too hard, yet too springy, at the same time.
The dash was ok - it is starting to look a little square and dated.
Esp. compared to the new E. Really nice on the inside. Nice on the outside, too, but a lot of people on casual glances won't be able to tell the difference between the E and the C. From many angles, they look very similar.
The new CLK looks really nice. The CLK500 looks like a heck of a car. Big improvement over the old CLK, which looks a little frumpy and uninspiring to me.
Have a nice weekend. I'm going on a large boat far away for a while.
I had the great fortune of having a 2001 E320 loaner for two days.
I was surprised at how quick it felt. Pretty nice power, and overall pretty nimble. Felt a lot quicker than my C240 6 speed. Didn't handle as nice, though, and felt a little "loose" overall.
The seats were a horrible vinyl/fake leather. Really cheap looking. Uncomfortable, too. They manage to be too hard, yet too springy, at the same time.
The dash was ok - it is starting to look a little square and dated.
Esp. compared to the new E. Really nice on the inside. Nice on the outside, too, but a lot of people on casual glances won't be able to tell the difference between the E and the C. From many angles, they look very similar.
The new CLK looks really nice. The CLK500 looks like a heck of a car. Big improvement over the old CLK, which looks a little frumpy and uninspiring to me.
Have a nice weekend. I'm going on a large boat far away for a while.
:o
i thought the E320 only came in leather?? afaik there is no vinal.
u are one of the only people that i have heard that actually like the new CLK to me and alot of other people they think they look girley and cheap. i would stick to my frumpy and uninspiring :o CLK430 anyday.
oh by the way i hope u dont make a wrong turn on your boat, there no rush for u to come back here.
It does not look like to many people care about your opinions.
:o
i thought the E320 only came in leather?? afaik there is no vinal.
u are one of the only people that i have heard that actually like the new CLK to me and alot of other people they think they look girley and cheap. i would stick to my frumpy and uninspiring :o CLK430 anyday.
oh by the way i hope u dont make a wrong turn on your boat, there no rush for u to come back here.
I like the design of the new CLK too. Although it is actually heavier than the W208, it looks more nimble. I like the interior of the W208 though because it is more similar to the W210 E-class (let you have a expensive feel). IMO the quality of the material of the W209 is better than the W208.
The truth is that i felt the CLK could have waited for another year before the complete make over.
Trending Topics
u are one of the only people that i have heard that actually like the new CLK to me and alot of other people they think they look girley and cheap. i would stick to my frumpy and uninspiring :o CLK430 anyday.
Styling problems with the old CLK are: too high trunk line, fat hips (rear fender area) from some angles, the HUGE gap between the rocker panel cover and the bottom of the door (why??) and finally the poorly integrated round headlights on the bluff, square-rigged nose.
I don't think that any car should be dismissed because it looks feminine. All of the world's greatest car designs are that way. It shouldn't be a problem to find a feminine design attractive, unless you're a gay man or a straight woman
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I don't know about the W210 E320, but the W211 E320 does not have leather as standard equipment. Look at the "Seating & Trim" heading on this page.
Seriously, what year did you get your GED?
FYI: i am still in High School.
..........................waiting for another immiture remark.
Styling problems with the old CLK are: too high trunk line, fat hips (rear fender area) from some angles, the HUGE gap between the rocker panel cover and the bottom of the door (why??) and finally the poorly integrated round headlights on the bluff, square-rigged nose.
But we all got our own opinions.
Last edited by Darkmann; Sep 22, 2002 at 08:05 PM.
If I had my choice of anything on the lot as a loaner, I think I'd be coming in for service quite often.






