E-Class (W210) 1995-2002: E 200, E 220D, E 240, E 290TD, E 300TD, E 200, E 240, E 280, E 320, E 420, E 430 (Wagon, Touring, 4Matic)

inline 6 or v6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 7, 2007 | 12:33 PM
  #26  
E-Klasse's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 2
From: Arizona, USA
W205 C300
Originally Posted by eddietr
As a car fan, I was very disappointed when Mercedes suddenly changed their tune on this. And I'm sure many a head shook in the engineering group over this. I was particularly disappointed in the 90 degree V! What is the excuse for that, other than cost savings?

There is something unmistakeable about the sound and feel of an I6. Particularly when they get older and still maintain that sound and feel.
Well said, I could not agree more...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #27  
daveosully's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: dublin ireland
95 sl320 silver
inline or v?

i have driven both at length and own an inline,before i had the oppurtunity to drive both i would have said the v6 because its the newer engine and would presume it would be an improvement allround,i have to say i wouldnt not thank you for the v compared to the i. stronger bhp,renowned reliability and if for no other reason the exhaust note is fantastic.....it screams its head off when you give it some. inline all day everyday
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #28  
eXpLiCitW210's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Cali
I own a 1999 W210 Mercedes.
Originally Posted by loubapache
Well, I will offer a counter opinion.

I have both M104 (I6) and M112 (V6) powered cars. Personally I prefer the I6. They both have nagetives and positives.

1) The I6 has only one real problem, i.e., oil leak. Most of the time it is only the upper timing cover (not the head gasket). Even if it is the head gasket, most of the time it is an external leak. Rarely there will be oil in coolant on this engine. So if someone can tolerate a bit of a leak, these engines will last for a long time. The bottom end is bullet proof.

2) The wiring harness on the W210 E class is a non-issue for the M104 engines. They were problems for the W124 (94 and 95 model years).

3) I am actaully seeing better mileage with my I6 than the V6. That might be due to the fact that the I6 is in a sedan and the V6 is in a 4Matic wagon.

4) I found that the I6 warms up to operating temperature much faster than the V6. On my 97 E320, the coolant will rach 87 deg C after a 3 mile drive on a 40 - 50 deg F day. The 03 E320 4Matic wagon will only reach about 60 deg C under the same conditons. So I am seeing lower city mileage on the V6. On highway, my 97 E320 gets 27- 29 MPG and the 03 E320 wagon gets about 23 MPG.

5. Maint is much easier on the I6. Only 6 easy plugs to change and the V6 has 12 and they are more difficult.

6. The V6 is showing many signs of engine mechanical problems. First sign is oil consumption and eventually it leads to damages in piston, ring, and walls, etc.

There might be something that is not optimum on my V6 but these were my observations.
i
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #29  
eXpLiCitW210's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, Cali
I own a 1999 W210 Mercedes.
relax

Originally Posted by zam2000
I guess it's really cut cut cost, that's why the M112/113 engine & its derivatives go into

The W210 & early W211 E55
The S/SL/CL 55
The SLR

The 3 valve per cyclinder, SOHC engine is nothing sort of engineering marvel, due to it amazing balance, torque, realiablility, ability to handle extra power, easy to tune & mod (by AMG).

You're quoting a harmonic balancing as the flaw of the engine design, wonder if you know that it's not really part of the engine, it's a pully wheel atach outside the engine to drive belt. Yes, there's flaw in early part, but it was fixed after the second years. The M104 really have flaw in engine design, due to problem w/ engine head being warp, and nightmare wiring harhness.

As for the S class still use the I6 for its 98/99 model, while other model going to V6, it's not because of the I6 superior, but because it was in its last year & slow selling (not much wooow factor in the 6 cylinder S class anyway, so Mercedes decided not to spend too much time & money to fit the V6 into it). Have you check the 98/99 S320 ? not only it uses the I6, it also use the previous gen radio, transmission (772.5), and A/C system. Smartkey ? Nope either.

My friend, who's a master tech at House of Import, told me that the S320 is known internally as a pig on wheels, nightmare to both owner and shop. It's as sucessful as the W220 S350: irelevant to the brand.

Even when the new engine generation came out (E/CL/S/ML 550), Mercedes still use the previous gen engine for the AMG version. I guess to ...cut cost ?

So that you know, the M112/M113 engine was voted as one of the best engine ever came out of Germany, won most number of engineering award so far. To cut cost ????

Btw, BMW stop making I6 as well, all latest 6 cylinder model now use the new V6 3.5 engine. Long cam shaft is never a good thing to go. Volvo simply use whatever POS Ford force on them.

As the matter of fact, I can't recall a single manufacture out there that still use I6.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #30  
Quadcammer's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 39
From: Clifton, NJ
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by zam2000
Btw, BMW stop making I6 as well, all latest 6 cylinder model now use the new V6 3.5 engine.
please tell me you're kidding.

don't make patently false comments.

the engine in the 335, 535, etc is an inline 6 with twin turbos.

as for your hate for the I-6, what about the 2jz-gte that can hold 1000rwhp in stock form.

don't be ignorant.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #31  
cap'n jasper's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: London, UK
W124
I think Princess Diana was actually in an S280, not a 320.

The I6 was replaced with the V6 to cut manufacturing costs but both are good engines.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #32  
1benzguy's Avatar
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Talking Wow

THANK YOU RAYMOND FOR THE GREAT INFORMATION.

This little v6 continues to out perofrm everything except other mb's.

What a great motor.

N
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 01:01 AM
  #33  
Eurosport's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,470
Likes: 0
From: around the world
monowiper
if i were to choose today, i'd still take an inline 6
w124 e300D, now that's bulletproof
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2014 | 05:15 PM
  #34  
oldsinner111's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 52
From: tennessee
s320
the inline 6 will return soon
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2014 | 09:56 PM
  #35  
Figuero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 293
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
2002 E430 4MATIC
Originally Posted by Nate
I believe the e320 was an inline 6 from 1996-1997, and v6 from 1998 on. The V6 has more horsepower than an inline 6 (I don't know about the torque). But I would assume that the torque on the v6 is more seeing that the 1998+ models go 0-60 faster than the 96-97. However, I have heard that the inline 6 is more mod friendly than the v6. The v6 is supposed to be more smooth.
Don't confuse more torque with the ability to accelerate faster. Power moves objects not force. Torque is a force, horsepower is well.....power.
If you have any doubts, consider that a 200lb man with a 24" long wrench can exert 400ftlbs of torque to the crankshaft of a W210. But I doubt he has the power to out accelerate the I6.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2014 | 07:50 AM
  #36  
Hirnbeiss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: Südflorida
'99 E430, '05 ML500, '15 GLK350
Originally Posted by Figuero
Don't confuse more torque with the ability to accelerate faster. Power moves objects not force. Torque is a force, horsepower is well.....power.
If you have any doubts, consider that a 200lb man with a 24" long wrench can exert 400ftlbs of torque to the crankshaft of a W210. But I doubt he has the power to out accelerate the I6.
Well, yes, but power is essentialy (ignoring the units conversion factor) torque x rpm, so the higher low end torque you have means better acceleration without a 1975 Kawasaki H1 style ear-shattering super rev and clutch dump being needed for a good take off.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 PM.