Continental or Michelin?
I'm going to skip the really long story about the vibration problems with my Yokohamas and how my tire show refused to replace them. The short story is that after complaining for the past 25,000 miles about major vibration with my yokohama's the tire store is finally deciding to do something about replacing them. Here are the two scenarios I'm being offered:
#1
Continental ExtremeContact DWS
235/45 17"
Cost: $420, including tax, lifetime mounting/balancing, replacement/refund/repair warranty, etc
#2
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S Plus
235/45 17"
Cost: $620, including tax, lifetime mounting/balancing, replacement/refund/repair warranty, etc
I'm pretty sure I'd like to go with the Michelins. I've had them before on my benzes and really like them. Plus I like my Michelin snow tires. Any thoughts on the Contis? Should I not get the Michelins and look for something else? Thanks for any real world experience comments on these options.

When you are ready to choose, find a shop which can do 'road force' balancing. It's about $5 extra per tire but ensures that the tire is mounted at the best possible position before weights are added. Only some balancing machines can do that. Check out the installers on the TireRack website for road force balancing in your area.
personally , i would never buy the contis again. ... but thats my opinion.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

.
These tires have great traction, are very quiet, love high speeds, have fantastic resistance to hydroplaning - a big deal here in the Pacific NW - and in snow they actually work.
My buddy in Colorado just put these on his C280 4Matic and I drove it through some awesome "twisties" in the back hills of Wyoming and Colorado at very high speeds and these tires rock!
KK
'00 E430
'95 E420










