E430 vs E320 gas consumption
1st gear, the E320 CDI is putting out a maximum of 3520 lb/ft at 1600 - 2600 rpm.
2nd gear the E320 CDI is putting a maximum of 2356 lb/ft.
3rd gear = 1379
4th gear = 978
The E420 picks up 90% of it's peak torque at 1500 rpm.
1st gear, the E420 is putting a maximum of 3244 lb/ft;
2nd gear the E420 is putting down a maximum of 2005 lb/ft.
3rd gear = 1173 lb/ft.
4th gear = 832 lb/ft.
The E420/E430 have VERY flat torque curves which enable them to achieve maximum torque values throughout the engine speed range. The diesel tapers off quite a bit after 2600.
Redlines are significantly higher than the diesel, so you need to multiply by 25% and add this value to the extra power the V8's really have.
I predict the E420/430 will start reeling in the CDI even before 60 mph(when 2nd gear ends on the CDI and 2nd gear continues on the M119/113). The torque peak is very narrowly spread out in the diesel. Even the 320 beats the CDI to 120 mph according to C&D(wait, not sure) by over 5 seconds.
Europe gets 0-100 km/h in an E320 CDI in 7.7 seconds. Albeit with slightly taller gears (2.47 diff versus 2.65). But the gearing should not make such a staggering difference in performance ability. I believe the euro tests are "foot to floor, and nothing else".
"Mercedes, by contrast, should have no trouble moving each and every E320 CDI it can bring in. Our example, in Euro trim without the added sound deadening we'll get, was the least dieselly-sounding and -acting of this bunch. It outperforms its gas cousin by a full second to 60 mph (6.4 seconds) and by 0.9 second and 3 mph in the quarter (14.9 at 93), and it makes 4 dBA less noise when running those tests. Stay on the throttle, though, and the acceleration curve flattens out quite a lot in top gear. The diesel will run to 149 mph, but the gas engine hits 120 mph 5.5 seconds sooner. But in all the driving most Americans do—scooting away from stoplights, passing on two-lane roads, and cruising the superslabs—the E320 CDI struck us as vastly superior to the base E320. We averaged 28 mpg overall, but on typical highway commutes we routinely topped 40 mpg driving at 75 to 80 mph. And check the European fuel-economy stats: 25 city, 44 highway—nearly the same as the four-cylinder PT Cruiser CRD, but with 82 more horsepower and 148 more pound-feet of torque. What's not to love? Priced right, perhaps midway between the E320 and E500, this car strikes us as a must-have."
Last edited by DslBnz; Feb 15, 2005 at 10:44 PM.
but i still believe that u get the general idea of lines

my miles per tank average 250-280. i am very spirited though. i never have figured out what the mpg's are
Last edited by my E430 rocket; Feb 15, 2005 at 10:45 PM.
" “The E320 CDI here on my right side, which we introduce this April in the United States, is such an exciting product,” said Jürgen Hubbert, head of the Mercedes Car Group. “In its combined cycle, it has a fuel consumption of 35 mpg, a figure unmatched by gasoline engines with similar power and torque. On the other hand, it accelerates from zero to 60 mph in only 7.3 seconds,” Hubbert said. In comparison, the 2004 E320 with a gasoline-fired 221-horsepower, 3.2-liter V-6 gets a 19/27 mpg city/highway rating and hits 60 mph in 7.1 seconds."
Usually get about 600. I am deliberately hard on it.
Drool on gasser boys.
Ken

The Best of Mercedes & AMG




