Was just told that the E320 has a crappy engine.
You're driving a nice classy car, at least pretend like you have some class instead of going to insult other people. Maybe you know a little more about Benz than a lot of people out there, but there are definitely things that others know a lot more than you do. Feels like I'm posting in ricerockets dot com.

Do you speak a foreign language?
Try this link, copy and paste that quote and select your language.
here is some hard facts for you if you're up to reading. It's hard not to see why some mistaken (or not) think that Mercedes uses domestic parts vice versa.
Besides, I thought you were a mechanic at a body shop, Dannieboiz, how come you don't know that the E320 engine is totally different than a GM engine?
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w203/147036-car-won-t-start-after-accident.html
But yea, next time, try to avoid using buzz words like "crappy", that really scared us avid 320 engine owners. Seriously, it's almost difficult to believe that someone would say that, even if that person did, I wouldn't believe it. It's kind of an extreme one to fall for.
You're driving a nice classy car, at least pretend like you have some class instead of going to insult other people. Maybe you know a little more about Benz than a lot of people out there, but there are definitely things that others know a lot more than you do. Feels like I'm posting in ricerockets dot com.

If you’re not happy with your M-B, I don't think a bunch of forum members are going to 'convince you to keep this car'. You're either happy with your Mercedes or your not. If you are, I'm not sure why 'someone just told me that the E320 has a GM engine, which is the same engine on the ML which all means crappy' means anything to you... clearly it doesn't mean much to members here that have vehicles with 100k miles or more...
Additionally, you wrote 'You're driving a nice classy car, at least pretend like you have some class instead of going to insult other people.' Perhaps you're guilty of just that, so you shouldn't take it personal when someone takes a shot back at you...
Last edited by Richard / E320; May 5, 2006 at 11:28 PM.
Do you speak a foreign language?
Try this link, copy and paste that quote and select your language.
here is some hard facts for you if you're up to reading. It's hard not to see why some mistaken (or not) think that Mercedes uses domestic parts vice versa.
Oh and the comment about sharing the engine with ML, meaning the engine is crappy...Pretty ballsy of you to say that. The 320 engine on our ML has been rock solid. Tell that to the people with 100k+ miles on their ML without every needing to replace an engine.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Jim

As for the original post.. I did (to be fair) have an MB Engineer (retired out here in Sun City) tell me recently that in 1997 when MB decided to go to "modular" engines with their gas cars.. namely with the V6 they replaced their I-6's with.. they asked Ford (not GM) to assist them in that design as they were not as experienced in this department.. up to that point, most MB engines were unique to their platform, and the way engines were made was much more costly.. The new "throw away" engines and transmission designs weren't made so much for long life, as they were made for inexpensive parts replacements.. He told me (and it stuck with me to when I decided to purchase the CDI) that the last of the true MB design & Quality engines is the 4-5-6 cylinder iron block diesel OM6xx engine.. and that when the Aluminum block V6 comes out, it will be a fraction of the former engine in terms of build quality.. MB is only now after numerous lawsuits reversing their claim on their transmissions that they are 100,000 mile service intervals.. they are actually now recommending new fluid ever 30K or so.. MB isn't alone in this, Lexus and Toyota are both reversing this life time trans policy as they've been in too many law suits over it.
This is a trend that ALL car makers are following sadly... From Bentley, down to VW.. nobody is spared from this cost cutting engineering... They literally just don't make 'em like they used to... the sooner we all accept it, the sooner we'll all get over it..
Last edited by CE750; May 8, 2006 at 12:09 PM.
BTW, here's a drawing of an M112 engine. http://www.whnet.com/4x4/new_V6.html
M
M
I've dealt with this type of person many times before. They just want to latch on something to belittle the car you own. I wonder if GM is still using those 3.8L pushrods (and those horrible small keys and that atrocious turn signal stalk). So you can counter and say NO, this actually is an engine that was built in THIS century, not some 50+ year throwback.
here's a fact that may stun some of you;
Mercedes purchased Detroit Diesel few years ago and then engine that Mercedes put their badge on is a very proven series 60 inline six power house. When Mercedes put out their own version of this replica of series 60 inline six , their engine fell short to the original design( loosing head gaskets due to not enough of clamping force on the cylinder head) .Too many unhappy customers and a bad reputation, go figure
BTW, here's a drawing of an M112 engine. http://www.whnet.com/4x4/new_V6.html





