E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

MPG Difference Between E350 and E500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-17-2008, 03:41 AM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
mafiozhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
MPG Difference Between E350 and E500

hey there guys i can't decide weather or not i should get a E350 or a E500 is the MPG diference toomuch between the two? or does it not make a big difference? please help me out guys ty
Old 09-17-2008, 04:00 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are very close on the highway, pick the one with better equipment.
Old 09-17-2008, 04:43 AM
  #3  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
mafiozhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
howbout the 320?

howbout the 320? u think i should go for a 320 instead of the rest do too gas prices? and also because the 320 is cheaper? lol
Old 09-17-2008, 04:58 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All you can do is make the best choice based on your financial situation. The fuel difference will not be large, 10% probably, I hope you are prepared to pay for maintenance? These are not the cars to buy on a stretched budget.
Old 09-17-2008, 09:53 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
NCE500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 E63, 2006 C55
RE: Mileage

My 05 E500 got excellent mileage, 20 or so around the burbs, and 29+ easily on trips. The 500 has gobs of torque and power, and will be much more entertaining to drive. If it were my $$, I would absolutely get the 500 as the price difference used is probably not that significant.
Old 09-17-2008, 01:34 PM
  #6  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
mafiozhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
Originally Posted by Untertürkheim
All you can do is make the best choice based on your financial situation. The fuel difference will not be large, 10% probably, I hope you are prepared to pay for maintenance? These are not the cars to buy on a stretched budget.
well i currently own a 740 il and its not a problem for me to keep up with the maintenance however the gas on the other hand i think its like 12 miles a gallon i basicaly waste like 10 dollars a day to drive it
also its not like im trying to buy it when i cant afford it

i was thinking of geting a cl500 before but i heard that it gives way to many problems and its big buxs to keep up with it is the E class problematic also?
Old 09-17-2008, 01:53 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaazmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,976
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by mafiozhak
well i currently own a 740 il and its not a problem for me to keep up with the maintenance however the gas on the other hand i think its like 12 miles a gallon i basicaly waste like 10 dollars a day to drive it
also its not like im trying to buy it when i cant afford it

i was thinking of geting a cl500 before but i heard that it gives way to many problems and its big buxs to keep up with it is the E class problematic also?
Ya, CL500 has **** load of problems. My heart fills with joy when I look at her, but I think it's time to let her go soon, really contemplating it.

E320 is great on gas mileage, but maintenance is the same for 500 (especially is you have airmatic on 320). I kind of regret not going for 500 but I sacrificed the engine (at the time) for all the options which I get more use out of anyway than the bigger engine. I'm sure if you lay off the throttle mashing you should get about 2 miles less to the gallon on surface.
Old 09-17-2008, 02:45 PM
  #8  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
mafiozhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
Originally Posted by gaazmon
Ya, CL500 has **** load of problems. My heart fills with joy when I look at her, but I think it's time to let her go soon, really contemplating it.

E320 is great on gas mileage, but maintenance is the same for 500 (especially is you have airmatic on 320). I kind of regret not going for 500 but I sacrificed the engine (at the time) for all the options which I get more use out of anyway than the bigger engine. I'm sure if you lay off the throttle mashing you should get about 2 miles less to the gallon on surface.
thanks for the info ill think bout the throttle mashing loll also any help on what an airmatic is? and is the E350 maintaince expensive or cheaper then the e500 and e320?
Old 09-17-2008, 04:14 PM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mafiozhak
thanks for the info ill think bout the throttle mashing loll also any help on what an airmatic is? and is the E350 maintaince expensive or cheaper then the e500 and e320?
The 350 replaced the 320, so it is newer, and probably more expensive.

Airmatic is air suspension, one of the best features offered on this model. That would be a reason alone for me to get the 500.
Old 09-17-2008, 05:32 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
007_e350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 528
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
X166 gls450 2017
Here in Chicago traffic is crazy which means more idling ... and trust me, you dont wanna do that in an 8 cylinder engine...
Also, snow, sleet/ ice is common, so you dont want a rear-wheel drive
thirdly, you'll get an 06 350 for mid 20s ...

still have doubts ? ... Suit what your needs are as per the area/ weather .... personally, 2 more cylinders do make one hell of a difference in mpg... and e350 is not a slow car, you'll love it in Sport mode!

And lastly, do read some threads here on airmatic suspension repair costs that come standard on 500s ....

350 rulz!!

Last edited by 007_e350; 09-17-2008 at 07:16 PM.
Old 09-17-2008, 07:26 PM
  #11  
Member
 
HumblePie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2005 E500
I can't speak for the 350. I have a '05 500 and LOVE it. I average about 17-19 in the city and 24-29 freeway. Here's a snap from a recent trip where I landed at about 26MPG. Granted I could've eeked out another 1-3MPG had I driven a little more responsibly...

Old 09-17-2008, 09:55 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Mackhack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 0
Received 116 Likes on 99 Posts
Same here, raising gas prices, more and more traffic, more and more idling,... I get good gas mileage out of my 2004 E320. The picture has been taken on a trip to Vegas from San Diego, no traffic, 85 to 100 mph with cruise control on for almost the entire trip.
Attached Thumbnails MPG Difference Between E350 and E500-pic-0022.jpg  
Old 09-18-2008, 12:19 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Dema's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,677
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i535
Wow, the trip took just a half of an hour.
Old 09-18-2008, 12:24 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
Mackhack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 0
Received 116 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by Dema
Wow, the trip took just a half of an hour.
No we stopped at Primm to get Gas and Mickey Dees
Old 09-18-2008, 03:57 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaazmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,976
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by Mackhack
Same here, raising gas prices, more and more traffic, more and more idling,... I get good gas mileage out of my 2004 E320. The picture has been taken on a trip to Vegas from San Diego, no traffic, 85 to 100 mph with cruise control on for almost the entire trip.
Nice. I think the 500's got better mileage once they added the 7-spd. The E350 also has a 7. The 320's had 5 gears. I know from the CL500 (it's a 2002, it doesn't get anything that good, but damn she roars amazingly).
Old 09-19-2008, 02:37 AM
  #16  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
mafiozhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
E350

im prolly going to go for the 2006 E350 also can sumone please post pictures of a sport 2006 E350 and a normal 2006 E350? i seen some on google but they all look different. lol thanks for all your help guys =]
Old 09-19-2008, 02:45 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
gaazmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,976
Received 37 Likes on 34 Posts
2009 SL550 Roadster Diamond White, 2008 CLK550 Coupe Obsidian Black
Originally Posted by mafiozhak
im prolly going to go for the 2006 E350 also can sumone please post pictures of a sport 2006 E350 and a normal 2006 E350? i seen some on google but they all look different. lol thanks for all your help guys =]
Go for sport. Better body work, more distinguishable.
Old 09-19-2008, 04:03 PM
  #18  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
mafiozhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
Originally Posted by gaazmon
Go for sport. Better body work, more distinguishable.
yea im looking for a sport E350 but sofar i havent had any luck finding a good one what do you think the price difference would be from a sport E350 and a normall E350?
Old 09-19-2008, 07:42 PM
  #19  
Super Member
 
TPAbnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 996
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2017 E300W
Originally Posted by gaazmon
more distinguishable.
Actually, saw the president of MBUSA on CNBC this week. He said 53% '08 US E350 sales were sport and marketing suggested more "value" to perceptions of American consumers.

So, in reality it's really more pedestrian. Hardly distinguishable; that catagory, arguably is the diesel.

Ooops, edited to add the E55 to my comments.

Last edited by TPAbnz; 09-19-2008 at 07:51 PM.
Old 09-19-2008, 10:55 PM
  #20  
Almost a Member!
 
oilbelcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E500 AMG pkg
Originally Posted by 007_e350
Here in Chicago traffic is crazy which means more idling ... and trust me, you dont wanna do that in an 8 cylinder engine...
Also, snow, sleet/ ice is common, so you dont want a rear-wheel drive
thirdly, you'll get an 06 350 for mid 20s ...

still have doubts ? ... Suit what your needs are as per the area/ weather .... personally, 2 more cylinders do make one hell of a difference in mpg... and e350 is not a slow car, you'll love it in Sport mode!

And lastly, do read some threads here on airmatic suspension repair costs that come standard on 500s ....

350 rulz!!
I never had problems with rear wheel drive cars in chicago snow. In fact, prefer it, so I can have fun when I want to. Especially with electronics and proper tires, this is never a reason to avoid the more dynamic choice. I bet a rear wheel drive E500 gets the same milage as a AWD E350. And the former is much more fun to drive. The airmatic is worth every penny. In fact, it is the only reason that kept me with MB and not with BMW (different car personalities, I know). I just bought my 46,000 mile 2005 E500 that with AMG visual package ('05 was first year to get 7 speed trans; important for perf. and MPG). I purchased the two extra years of warranty on top of the 1 year with CPO, with total of 3+ years of insured fun. This car is absolutely great. Gas milage is not bad at all, in fact better than my manual G35 6 cyl I had. I was cruising down A1A the other day, blasting a little vanilla ice... rolling in my 5.0 8cyl.

That naturally aspirated torque is so addictive...
Old 09-20-2008, 12:11 AM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TPAbnz
Actually, saw the president of MBUSA on CNBC this week. He said 53% '08 US E350 sales were sport and marketing suggested more "value" to perceptions of American consumers.

So, in reality it's really more pedestrian. Hardly distinguishable; that catagory, arguably is the diesel.

Ooops, edited to add the E55 to my comments.
Absolutely, nothing can come close to the diesel for fuel economy.
Old 09-20-2008, 02:49 AM
  #22  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
mafiozhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
E350 with airmatic?

everyone says they love this airmatic thing does the E350 come with it? or is it in E500 only?
Old 09-20-2008, 08:54 AM
  #23  
Super Member
 
TPAbnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 996
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2017 E300W
Originally Posted by mafiozhak
everyone says they love this airmatic thing does the E350 come with it? or is it in E500 only?
Sadly, no.
Old 09-20-2008, 08:57 AM
  #24  
Super Member
 
TPAbnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 996
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
2017 E300W
Originally Posted by Untertürkheim
Absolutely, nothing can come close to the diesel for fuel economy.
While making a run yesterday to St. Pete (for some colossal heads-on fresh shrimp!) I glanced at the trip computer: 41.1 mpg while crossing the bay. It's amazing.
Old 09-20-2008, 04:50 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mafiozhak
everyone says they love this airmatic thing does the E350 come with it? or is it in E500 only?
The first year for the E350, 2006, had airmatic as an option. In 2007 it was eliminated.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: MPG Difference Between E350 and E500



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.