Official Pics 2010 W211 at Detroit
Also don't like the way the hood line is on the side like the C-Class. The front quarter panel would flow much nicer without that hood line separation.
The main bonus will definitely the added reliability of the 2010 E-class since they got rid of Schrempf the quality of the cars and testing of the cars before launch has much improved as seen by the new S and C class have much less problems than with the previous S, C, and E.
The proportions of the taillight on the W212 seems smaller relative to the entire rear of the car than on the W210, could that be the difference?
Also don't like the way the hood line is on the side like the C-Class. The front quarter panel would flow much nicer without that hood line separation.
The main bonus will definitely the added reliability of the 2010 E-class since they got rid of Schrempf the quality of the cars and testing of the cars before launch has much improved as seen by the new S and C class have much less problems than with the previous S, C, and E.
The bright side is that the exterior and interior still looks better than the 5 series. I mean when I sat in the 5 series I had no clue whatsoever that I was in a luxury car. A Civic interior used better plastics for god sakes. I can't wait to see what the new % will look like and to see what kind of materials they will use in it since they have been severly trashed by the press and the public for the cheap plastic.
When I first sat in the w211 I fell in love with the interior first. With the swoopy lines it looked very appealing and modern. The w221 just like others have said the design is a step back IMO even though they may have used quality materials. Someone who has the time and know how try to paste side by side pictures of the w211 and w221 front side and rear profiles along with an interior dash shot and lets see which one looks better. This should be interesting and set up a poll. Then do another poll once the new w221 comes out and see what the results are.
(however, E gives up its traditional round shape headlights this time.)
I tried to get a picture of rear lights of Luxus ES 2000 model.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Click above to see all the pictures you'll need to of the new E
People calling the interior cheap is something my brain just cant seem to process. Looks stunning, tasteful, upscale & expensive!
Last edited by MAN1; Jan 14, 2009 at 08:31 PM.

BTW, I think the rear looks a bit like the Genesis, but has a more solid appearance, while not having as sculpted and dynamic a look. I think it actually resembles a Sonata's rear
.
Last edited by K-A; Jan 14, 2009 at 08:31 PM.

BTW, I think the rear looks a bit like the Genesis, but has a more solid appearance, while not having as sculpted and dynamic a look. I think it actually resembles a Sonata's rear
.




i like the new taillights more than the biiiiiig old ones...
Now they really dropped the ball with the back end. It's a bit too conservative. Centre dash looks horrible in certain pictures, especially those with direct flash. Not exactly flattering photography. The liberal use of plastics and hard angles/lines doesn't help. Under better, more skilful lighting the interior is transformed into something much more beautiful as seen in the official photos.
Last edited by milkpowder; Jan 15, 2009 at 08:10 AM.
Now they really dropped the ball with the back end. It's a bit too conservative. Centre dash looks horrible in certain pictures, especially those with direct flash. Not exactly flattering photography. The liberal use of plastics and hard angles/lines doesn't help. Under better, more skilful lighting the interior is transformed into something much more beautiful as seen in the official photos.I was noticing that picture of the E sitting behind the W221 S, and noticed how much more square and sharp-edged the E is than the S, the S has a mix of the strong trendy bulky look, with some of M-B's signature sleekness.
The front does look like something straight out of Gotham City though in that picture Dema posted, definitely a cool factor, but I have my reservations over how timeless this design will be....
Last edited by K-A; Jan 15, 2009 at 08:41 AM.
In person, the lighting will be much softer and forgiving of the numerous angles/planes that MB has chosen to use.Here's an analogy, after which I shall say no more about lighting. Take your point and shoot, set it on auto and take a self portrait from a foot away. How flattering do you think you look?:p I bet you look better in the mirror and certainly better under the warm glow of a sunset. Now imagine having a portrait taken in studio conditions complete with softboxes, diffuser umbrellas, reflectors, warming filters, etc... Then the photo is edited: dust removed, imperfections cloned away, colours tinkered with. 'Nuff said.
This is how i am absorbing all the comments coming out even though we know that looking at something in 3D, in person is always much more dramatic! Im pretty sure most of you will change your mind pretty soon.









