Any Rear door unlock feature?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 S400, QX56
Any Rear door unlock feature?
I always wanted to ask this question...
Is there a setting that provides rear passengers the feature to unlock and open the door just by pulling the door opening lever when the door is locked?
Its annoying when the rear passenger has to pull the lock/unlock knob to open the door.
Is there a setting that provides rear passengers the feature to unlock and open the door just by pulling the door opening lever when the door is locked?
Its annoying when the rear passenger has to pull the lock/unlock knob to open the door.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
2015 ML 350
Even in American cars the rear passengers must 1st unlock the rear doors either electrically or by manually operating the lock button/lever... unless of course the "Child Lock" feature is activated. In that case rear seat passengers can never open the doors from the inside on American cars.. This is a safety feature to protect kids from falling out.
#3
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SF bay area
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
slk55 2005; e320 2004 sport
I always wondered why the rear doors can't be opened and unlocked by pulling the door lever from the inside.
It is such a nice feature in the front doors.
It is such a nice feature in the front doors.
#5
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Worcester, MA.
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2013 E350
T.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,340
Received 293 Likes
on
245 Posts
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
I thought this US implementation was from a US law but I guess it is an MBUSA requirement (liability?) if Volvo is doing it the "Euro way"?
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
2015 ML 350
By "even American cars" you must be referring to US cars against Canadian cars? In Europe the door can be opened from the handle, unless child locks are on.
I thought this US implementation was from a US law but I guess it is an MBUSA requirement (liability?) if Volvo is doing it the "Euro way"?
I thought this US implementation was from a US law but I guess it is an MBUSA requirement (liability?) if Volvo is doing it the "Euro way"?
I'm sure the rear door locking style IS an American requirement for MB.
Trending Topics
#10
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: global traveller
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
some slow@$$diesels
it is a hardware swap - not a software change...the actual doorlock mechanism is different for the NA spec cars...that different lock is also the reason why the NA spec cars were equipped with the back-to-the-seventies doorpins
greetingz,
greetingz,
#12
Antique door pins, man. Kind of like the ignition in the face of the dash where you can access it easily instead of the steering column, or that silly analog clock that always displays the time, ignition on or off 24/7, or that trunk access that is locked when necessary and unlocked when it should be accessible, ditto the fuel filler flap. Or that global locking / unlocking feature instead of the idiotic Chrysler global locking and individual unlocking feature so that each door must be addressed when exiting the vehicle and trying to open a rear hatch / door etc. Or how about the radio "on "feature with the ignition off for a limited amount of time, ditto the electric windows. Ditto "rest"
Clearly these M-B engineers are fossils. Since I am one as well. I am really fond of old school stuff that functions better, I never ride in the back seat anyway, they can wait.
Clearly these M-B engineers are fossils. Since I am one as well. I am really fond of old school stuff that functions better, I never ride in the back seat anyway, they can wait.
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
2015 ML 350
Actually, the Euro "Flush To Sill When Locked" pins would be a little scary if a collision resulted in the car being submerged. I prefer the 07> pins type which are cylindrical (not Golf Tee shaped) like the Euro pins, but are longer than the Euro Pins and do not sit flush with the sill when locked, so there's something to grab on to to pull up in the case of vehicle submersion. You have limited visibility, panic, a brief time to undo the belts, unlock & escape all while being woozy when the car is under water, hopefully upright, but probably nose down. The dash unlock button and power windows will be of no use when wet. Having that 1/2 inch of pin to pull up with is OK with me.
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,340
Received 293 Likes
on
245 Posts
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
1) I always drive with doors unlocked, I don't have to be scared of someone entering the car at traffic lights etc, at least nobody unfriendly.
2) at an accident, doors would unlock automatically.
3) people at the car should be used to opening the doors from the handle, not from the lock pin. At an accident, it would be natural to open from the handle instead of starting to think about "this is a special case, now open the doors from the door lock pin that I've never done before".
2) at an accident, doors would unlock automatically.
3) people at the car should be used to opening the doors from the handle, not from the lock pin. At an accident, it would be natural to open from the handle instead of starting to think about "this is a special case, now open the doors from the door lock pin that I've never done before".
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 S400, QX56
But why only mercedes? How come BMW's can get across this and provide this easy unlock feature.
Shouldn't safety law apply to all car manufacturers?
Shouldn't safety law apply to all car manufacturers?
#19
Super Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
.... nothing to brag about, it is a previous model....
I found co-worker's VW also able to fold down the rear seat from inside the cabin.
( is it possible MB is not very "good" w/ folding rear seat design? I mean, if I remember correctly, MB didn't really have fold down rear seat on their 4-door sedan until early 2000? )
( is it possible MB is not very "good" w/ folding rear seat design? I mean, if I remember correctly, MB didn't really have fold down rear seat on their 4-door sedan until early 2000? )
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
2015 ML 350
Just a guess.... perhaps I'm overthinking this whole discussion... anyway... How's your day?
#21
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
E350
Maybe the BMW has a user selectable activatation switch for the child lock mechanism on the (striker) edge of the door which elimimantes the decision being made for you at the factory. American cars have a slot on the edge of the door into which you put a screwdriver into & slide a switch which will make it so the interior handle will never open the door. It always must be opened from the outside.
Just a guess.... perhaps I'm overthinking this whole discussion... anyway... How's your day?
Just a guess.... perhaps I'm overthinking this whole discussion... anyway... How's your day?
The interesting thing is that Mercedes USED to have a striker on the rear doors, just like the BMW and American cars you mention. In fact, I remember in a very old Mercedes manual I read, it mentioned this feature and had instructions on how to enable and disable the child locks on the rear doors.
But then again, this was a while ago... sort of strange they decided NOT to keep this feature. It was probably because the "geniuses" at MBUSA decided Americans weren't "smart" enough to figure out how to use this feature anyway (just like how we Americans aren't "smart" enough to figure out the Auto Tilt Passenger Mirror).
#22
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
E350
It's possible.
It's possible that Mercedes added this option to the W210/W211 and other 4-Door sedans as a later addition, and didn't want to change the existing seat patterns/fixtures to save cost.
It's also possible that Mercedes is also more concerned with the asthetics of having plastic "fold down" handles easily in view of people sitting in the cabin, and they felt that it would possibly take away from the elegance of the car from the inside.
It could also mean that Mercedes is concerned if people break into your car through a window, they would easily have access to your valuables in the trunk through Split Folding Seats (without making the thief crack open the trunk lock or going through some sheet metal first), and "alerting" thieves as to which cars are easy targets (since the Split Folding Seat handles would be easily seen through the windows). (Don't forget that Mercedes-Benz vehicles in North America do NOT have any pressure alarm triggers or breaking glass alarm triggers inside the cabin.)
There could be many reasons why Mercedes chose to do it this way. They most certainly could put the Split Folding Seat handles on the seats themselves (like in the 2003 C230 Kompressor Sports Coupe, or the ML-Class SUV), but they didn't in the sedans for some reason. (Maybe because if you gain access to the cabin of a hatchback or SUV, you have open access to their cargo compartment, whereas in a sedan it's possible to keep the cargo compartment protected? Who knows? )
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,340
Received 293 Likes
on
245 Posts
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
The interesting thing is that Mercedes USED to have a striker on the rear doors, just like the BMW and American cars you mention. In fact, I remember in a very old Mercedes manual I read, it mentioned this feature and had instructions on how to enable and disable the child locks on the rear doors.
But then again, this was a while ago... sort of strange they decided NOT to keep this feature. It was probably because the "geniuses" at MBUSA decided Americans weren't "smart" enough to figure out how to use this feature anyway (just like how we Americans aren't "smart" enough to figure out the Auto Tilt Passenger Mirror).
But then again, this was a while ago... sort of strange they decided NOT to keep this feature. It was probably because the "geniuses" at MBUSA decided Americans weren't "smart" enough to figure out how to use this feature anyway (just like how we Americans aren't "smart" enough to figure out the Auto Tilt Passenger Mirror).
http://www4.mercedes-benz.com/manual...shtml#d75e4799
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,800
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
10 Posts
1953 300 Adenauer, 1971 300 SEL 6.3, 1975 600, 1978 450 6.9
BINGO
In addition, it is far easier to pull the latch in the trunk than it is to find the latch on the seats....
#25
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 S400, QX56
If a rear door is locked in a BMW - passenger can pull it once and it unlocks and pulling it again opens the door.
Oh well, Mercedes might come up with something more intelligent some day.
I'll wait...