Finally REAL NAV news. Talking to sales rep as I type
They tell me the MBUSA will typically send a distribution fax or e-mail to all dealerships at the same time, but will order them by sales volume. This is a pretty large dealership for Texas, but perhaps the one California was larger. Still, you'd think that if the notices were sent out late in the day or even overnight, my dealership would have received it by now. Perhaps Legacy's salesperson has access to advance information. Like everyone else, I'm still waiting for something in writing addressed to me....
what dealerships did u go to
my dealerships said that they didn't know anything about nav .....
is that the dealership try to lie to me or what ??
the dealership is in California LA rusnak
of course i will go for a new car, but damn, what the hell is this, a 03?? when i get this 03, all the 04's will come out....and that means a year w/o nav...so basically, we all could have waited for an 04.......they should give us an 04, i can't believe they are offereing a 03....how sad from MB
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
We do not know the details as of yet. No harm in asking for the 04 option.
Why does'nt the replacement make the deal whole?
How does the replacement put you at a disadvantage?
I understand the 04 is next in the que.
Clearly this is the end of the model year.
Depreciation is already built in to the replacement vehicle.
I'm trying to understand.
Sales tax paid on current E-Class and due on replacement
Registration fee paid on current E-Class and due on replacement
Extended Warranty purchased for current car and how it would be transferred to replacement car
How any loan on current car would be paid off and reset on replacement?
Also unknown is whether or not any changes will be permitted to the configuration of the replacement car. My reading of the letter is that none will be. M-B knows the configuration of every car in the potential replacement pool. They can easily re-cycle this list through their factory. The introduction of changes would add a complication to the process from their view point.
I presume (hope) that all will be addressed in the details to the dealers next week.
Legacy
Not yet known are M-B USA's position on handling of such items as:
Sales tax paid on current E-Class and due on replacement
Registration fee paid on current E-Class and due on replacement
Extended Warranty purchased for current car and how it would be transferred to replacement car
How any loan on current car would be paid off and reset on replacement?
Also unknown is whether or not any changes will be permitted to the configuration of the replacement car. My reading of the letter is that none will be. M-B knows the configuration of every car in the potential replacement pool. They can easily re-cycle this list through their factory. The introduction of changes would add a complication to the process from their view point.
I presume (hope) that all will be addressed in the details to the dealers next week.
Legacy
Not yet known are M-B USA's position on handling of such items as:
Sales tax paid on current E-Class and due on replacement
Registration fee paid on current E-Class and due on replacement
Extended Warranty purchased for current car and how it would be transferred to replacement car
How any loan on current car would be paid off and reset on replacement?[SNIP]
Legacy
6. Dealer-supplied options purchased (I'm thinking about the LoJack option - in addition to the 3 yr. extended warranty - I purchased)
7. Will mileage figure into the equation, and if so, how? (I've got just under 4,000 miles despite an Oct. delivery)
Why is an 03 replacement a problem?
Why does'nt the replacement make the deal whole?
How does the replacement put you at a disadvantage?
I understand the 04 is next in the que.
Clearly this is the end of the model year.
Depreciation is already built in to the replacement vehicle.
I'm trying to understand.
What it comes down to is this. I bought this car thinking I would have NAV by March '03 at the latest. I'm not one of those guys that got NAV just for kicks; I really, really need it. Now, MB should assume all of the people that choose this option need it, not just want it. Making someone that needs such an option wait until August or later simply isn’t fair. I would have NOT bought this car if I knew this in October. This is why I want to know who is in my shoes, and needs their NAV....and can’t wait 4-5 more months. I intend to fight this and get a refund of my money.
It seems that MB is going down the drain, it’s sad...but in my eyes true. I just read about the new Chrysler Crossfire in the paper today (uses 40% of MB parts, including engine and tranny)....I'm sorry if I digressed, but in my mind the NAV and Crossfire tie in to what seems like a deterioration of the MB brand.
This will get real complicated, real fast.
Drb,
What it comes down to is this. I bought this car thinking I would have NAV by March '03 at the latest. I'm not one of those guys that got NAV just for kicks; I really, really need it. Now, MB should assume all of the people that choose this option need it, not just want it. Making someone that needs such an option wait until August or later simply isn’t fair. I would have NOT bought this car if I knew this in October. This is why I want to know who is in my shoes, and needs their NAV....and can’t wait 4-5 more months. I intend to fight this and get a refund of my money.
It seems that MB is going down the drain, it’s sad...but in my eyes true. I just read about the new Chrysler Crossfire in the paper today (uses 40% of MB parts, including engine and tranny)....I'm sorry if I digressed, but in my mind the NAV and Crossfire tie in to what seems like a deterioration of the MB brand.
My questions represent my effort to probe the MB deal not question the car itself. I am trying to discern what the compelling reason for me, the customer, might be to take this deal. If it truly is unfavorable, what grounds are there to to press for something more equitable. The argument for an 04 seems weak as it will not be a direct comparison to the 03, considering the depreciation level alone.
If I had nav at the outset, racked up the miles and wanted to trade the car for an 04, I would eat the depreciation. Taking a replacement car now, and turning it in for an 04 will still have the depreciation locked in, but the milege will be very low by October. I have turned in my car every 2 years with low miles, and I always pick up a premium on the trade in. This time it will be no different.
Assuming I get my NAV-less car replaced with a new 03 car with NAV and with exactly the same equipment and with absolutely $0 cash exchanged either way to facilitate the exchange. Assume also that the lease allowed miles are reduced by the amount of miles I have on my current car when I turn it in.
This would seem to be an even exchange from everyone's standpoint. But, as others on this board have insinuated, how does that compensate me for the fact that instead of having NAV in March, I will get it in July/August?
I agree with previous opinions - a third option should be to simply allow you to terminate your lease immediately upon receiving news that they can not retrofit. We should have had this option when March 31 came along and they did not have retrofit kits to the dealers.
I personally believe I could drop my lease payment on an identical car by $75 if I bought the same car now instead of the price I paid in december of 2002. This is what I will attempt to do.
The retrofit is not feasible. MBUSA is offering, in full resolution of any concerns regarding their inability to provide a retrofit navigation system, the following:
$3250 New Vehicle Sales Voucher
Valid through December 31, 2003 on the purchase of any new C/E/M/S/SLK Class vehicle. AMG moels are excluded with the exception of C32, ML55 and SLK32. Dealer has details of the offer.
This letter differs from the earlier one offering $2k reimbursement or vehicle exchange.
What do you think?
Last edited by drb; Apr 28, 2003 at 10:55 AM.
$500 was compensation for the delay in receiving the NAV system from the time I began my lease until the promised delivery date of "early spring 03". The situation as it stands now will mean i get the NAV system in mid-August - some 5 months later than the date represented by the $500 discount.
For those who are considering the replacement car, is there any estimate on delivery time? It took them three months to make my car the first time; am I looking at another three months?
the letter from australia said can be retro-fit the command system then why not the E-class in the usa?


