Cranshaft sensor
I found the incident very inconvenient (not to mention embarassing) and unnecessary. It could also have been dangerous if it were to stop at high speed on a highway. Why do Mercedes use this sensor, and why didn't it give any warning in the first place? Is this common with this particular model? With cars being very reliant on electronics nowadays I think we'd be better off using old technology which rely more on mechanical which are more reliable.
Cars of the 1970s (back when they had few electronics) tended to be vastly less reliable than today's modern cars. The "good old days" are right now.
Just be happy it failed in a relatively safe location.
The part that failed has no moving parts and is a more-or-less necessary component in a modern eletronic ignition car. A mechanical-based ignition system would have more parts to fail and substantially more frequent maintenance, that many people would forget to do, and be stranded at the side of the road. On balance, you are probably better off with what happened. (btw, the part usually fails after some warning signs, such as engine stops when hot a few times. If you'd been able to wait for it to cool down, you may have been able to restart it and drive to a repair place - assuming you knew to do that, of course.) I agree with Vettdvr, these are the good day.
Are there any other components/parts/devices that would give the same trouble (i.e engine stalling without any prior warning) that I should be mindful of? I don't want ot be caught again unprepared in the future.
Thanks again, I have benefited significantly from this forum.



Are there any other components/parts/devices that would give the same trouble (i.e engine stalling without any prior warning) that I should be mindful of? I don't want ot be caught again unprepared in the future.
Thanks again, I have benefited significantly from this forum.



