:o
new MBs "closing doors"
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
new MBs "closing doors"
I have a 97 E320 that's built like a tank but getting long in the tooth. I started looking at new cars when the S class came out but I noticed that when closing the door on the car in the showroom, rather than hearing the traditional MB thunk I heard a shimmy and clatter from the window and sheetmetal! This combined with the cheap looking dash display turned me off on to an 80K car.
Now, looking at the new E class vs the BMW 5 I am struck with how closing the door with the window open I hear the same clatter rather than a thunk! as on my 97' or the new 5 (which still sounds like a good German car should.
What's the story with this? I thought these guys had this stuff down as their calling card.
Now, looking at the new E class vs the BMW 5 I am struck with how closing the door with the window open I hear the same clatter rather than a thunk! as on my 97' or the new 5 (which still sounds like a good German car should.
What's the story with this? I thought these guys had this stuff down as their calling card.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 254
Likes: 3
This is just one of the results of decontenting and cost cutting MB is doing to save money. The 140 was built like a tank, the 220, like a cardboard box. It's so apparent in everything in the 220; the quality of plastics, the way interior equipment operates, etc. Even a Lexus LS430 interior is nicer than the 220.
Last edited by Petmerctech; May 15, 2004 at 11:52 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
To me I'm perfectly happy with the latest MB products. I care a lot about the improved safety, performance and luxury.
I don't think it's fair to say the newer Benzes are built like cardboard boxes compard to the old. Yes, the older models may *feel* like a tank (noiser, less nimble) but I rather get into an accident in the newer models with the proper crumble zone, air bags, etc.
There is no question that the newer MB models are far safer.
I don't think it's fair to say the newer Benzes are built like cardboard boxes compard to the old. Yes, the older models may *feel* like a tank (noiser, less nimble) but I rather get into an accident in the newer models with the proper crumble zone, air bags, etc.
There is no question that the newer MB models are far safer.
Last edited by W210; May 15, 2004 at 07:30 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: THE NAPA VALLEY, CA
Build date 2-04 E500
Originally posted by W210
There is no question that the newer MB models are far safer.
There is no question that the newer MB models are far safer.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: UK
Originally posted by norb
That's because your not supposed to slam a door on a 220, they have door assist motors to close the door for you. Slamming a dooor? How pedestrian.
That's because your not supposed to slam a door on a 220, they have door assist motors to close the door for you. Slamming a dooor? How pedestrian.
I love letting the car close the door for me, I got so used to it, I lightly closed the door on our Vauxhall Vectra and realised, "oh **** I have to slam it shut".
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
Why I prefer newer Mercedes models
Originally posted by HELL ONA HARLEY
I agree, safer, lighter, faster and with better gas milage too boot....The days of cars having 18 guage sheetmetal and 1/4" thick glass are gone forever and this is for all auto makers, not just MB....
I agree, safer, lighter, faster and with better gas milage too boot....The days of cars having 18 guage sheetmetal and 1/4" thick glass are gone forever and this is for all auto makers, not just MB....
A tank like feel is not everything, look at the increased fatality in auto accidents last year in the US, which the government blames largely on the popularity of unsafe SUVs.
Give me a modern MB any day please, far better active (superior braking, acceleration, handling) and passive safety.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
I never said anothing about "slamming" but simply closing. The fact is that the perception of solidity and quality that MB was so good at and that Lexus took pains to emulate when they built their first LS 15 y/a was the calling card of a quality feel that seperated MB from junk sold at 1/2 the price. Now MB still costs twice what a Nissan or Honda costs yet a Nissan Maxima will blow the doors off an E320 with greater reliability, and the same "crumple zones" to allow it to score at least as well in crash testing. MB and BMW are trading on their cachet while the quality is no longer leaps and bounds above the competition and the only reason I wouldn't buy a Honda or Nissan is because my friends would think I wasn't doing well financially if I did.
Personally i don't care....i'll keep my old E320. It's hard to figure out exactly why an E320 costs twice as much as a Honda Accord with more HP or why a stereo upgrade costs more than a good home system would from scratch!
As long as people buy it they can sell it!
Personally i don't care....i'll keep my old E320. It's hard to figure out exactly why an E320 costs twice as much as a Honda Accord with more HP or why a stereo upgrade costs more than a good home system would from scratch!
As long as people buy it they can sell it!
Super Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Western Burbs
'06 SL65
Originally posted by ssafran
I never said anothing about "slamming" but simply closing. The fact is that the perception of solidity and quality that MB was so good at and that Lexus took pains to emulate when they built their first LS 15 y/a was the calling card of a quality feel that seperated MB from junk sold at 1/2 the price. Now MB still costs twice what a Nissan or Honda costs yet a Nissan Maxima will blow the doors off an E320 with greater reliability, and the same "crumple zones" to allow it to score at least as well in crash testing. MB and BMW are trading on their cachet while the quality is no longer leaps and bounds above the competition and the only reason I wouldn't buy a Honda or Nissan is because my friends would think I wasn't doing well financially if I did.
Personally i don't care....i'll keep my old E320. It's hard to figure out exactly why an E320 costs twice as much as a Honda Accord with more HP or why a stereo upgrade costs more than a good home system would from scratch!
As long as people buy it they can sell it!
I never said anothing about "slamming" but simply closing. The fact is that the perception of solidity and quality that MB was so good at and that Lexus took pains to emulate when they built their first LS 15 y/a was the calling card of a quality feel that seperated MB from junk sold at 1/2 the price. Now MB still costs twice what a Nissan or Honda costs yet a Nissan Maxima will blow the doors off an E320 with greater reliability, and the same "crumple zones" to allow it to score at least as well in crash testing. MB and BMW are trading on their cachet while the quality is no longer leaps and bounds above the competition and the only reason I wouldn't buy a Honda or Nissan is because my friends would think I wasn't doing well financially if I did.
Personally i don't care....i'll keep my old E320. It's hard to figure out exactly why an E320 costs twice as much as a Honda Accord with more HP or why a stereo upgrade costs more than a good home system would from scratch!
As long as people buy it they can sell it!
As far as the W220 S Class....I do agree when we bought our '02 S500....the use of plastics looked cheap in some parts of the cabin compared to our '91 560SEL it replaced. Pneumatic doors is a nice feature....wish they had it in the E.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,061
Likes: 326
From: 2000 ft over the FL coast in a B-17
Various
The doors just don't close with the solid precision sounding metallic thunk of the W126 and older S class. A more recent example is true of the 1999-2002 W208 CLK's vs the 2003+ W209's, the 208 sounds closer to a real benz of yore and the 209's sound Japanese and the metal does flex. The same is also true with water cooled Porsche's vs aircooled, the door latches/hardware were so much more expensive than the new and the sound and quality of the close is night and day between the two, I should know I've owned quite a few of both. The doors on the new E class are not that bad rather nice sounding but nothing like a W126. Don't believe me go try them side by side. With respect to safety, the SRS stuff is vastly improved as are the computer designed crumple zones etc...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
Why Mercedes
Originally posted by ssafran
Now MB still costs twice what a Nissan or Honda costs yet a Nissan Maxima will blow the doors off an E320 with greater reliability, and the same "crumple zones" to allow it to score at least as well in crash testing. MB and BMW are trading on their cachet while the quality is no longer leaps and bounds above the competition and the only reason I wouldn't buy a Honda or Nissan is because my friends would think I wasn't doing well financially if I did.
Personally i don't care....i'll keep my old E320. It's hard to figure out exactly why an E320 costs twice as much as a Honda Accord with more HP or why a stereo upgrade costs more than a good home system would from scratch!
Now MB still costs twice what a Nissan or Honda costs yet a Nissan Maxima will blow the doors off an E320 with greater reliability, and the same "crumple zones" to allow it to score at least as well in crash testing. MB and BMW are trading on their cachet while the quality is no longer leaps and bounds above the competition and the only reason I wouldn't buy a Honda or Nissan is because my friends would think I wasn't doing well financially if I did.
Personally i don't care....i'll keep my old E320. It's hard to figure out exactly why an E320 costs twice as much as a Honda Accord with more HP or why a stereo upgrade costs more than a good home system would from scratch!
Having extensively driven Honda and Nissan products, I can tell you why they are inferior when compared to your old E320. Sure, the Accord V6 may be impressive on paper with 260 horses but have you tried using those power? Yes, the steering wheel will start going wild in your hands (torque steer), the front tires will chirp fighting for lack of traction.
And the Infinit G35? My back hurts as a passenger, as Nissan cut corners I can't even tilt the seat bottom to give my thighs more support. The interior looks cheap and nasty too.
Reliability? The ever popular Odyssey which we bought brand new in 2002 rattles and squeaks like there is no tomorrow (from glove box and both sliding doors). We have brought the car to the dealer at least 4 times and they're still at a lost on how to fix the problems. Of course, torque steer and an annoying rear brakes clunk are part of the ongoing issues. After visiting several Honda car forums, I realize our car is perfectly normal and thus have given up on the various squeaks and rattles, although I will probably bring it in to the dealership for the transmission recall.
Personally I have not experienced the famous Japanese reliability. I find the front wheel drive Japanese cars completely lacking in performance as the poor chassis spoils the driving pleasure. It's extremely annoying everytime I step on the gas, the steering wheel will do the left and right twist.
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
Originally posted by ssafran
[B MB and BMW are trading on their cachet while the quality is no longer leaps and bounds above the competition and the only reason I wouldn't buy a Honda or Nissan is because my friends would think I wasn't doing well financially if I did.
[/B]
[B MB and BMW are trading on their cachet while the quality is no longer leaps and bounds above the competition and the only reason I wouldn't buy a Honda or Nissan is because my friends would think I wasn't doing well financially if I did.
[/B]
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
I wouldn't buy one becausse I already have a Mercedes that's pretty much hassle free but has 105K miles! I work hard to make a very decent living and I'm thinking about buying a gift for myself to celebrate my success. My problem is that the build quality and the brake feel and reliability is so reduced on the new W211 (IMHO) that I can't pull the trigger on that car! My friend has a new E320 that has been towed twice in the first 6 mo. because of software problems. I would get a BMW but I'm not clear that this is any better at this point so I'm considering my alternatives.
If the G35 had a decent interior for a few K more I'd get it in 4wd because that engine is far stronger than what's in the E class!
If the G35 had a decent interior for a few K more I'd get it in 4wd because that engine is far stronger than what's in the E class!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
MB is feeling the heat and will be upgrading the 3.2 L to the new 4 valve V6 3.7 L (or is it 3.5 L) shortly. The E320 CDI should also be a nice alternative if available in your state.
The G35 is much nicer than the Accord. However, I totally agree the interior really annoys me.
Most German cars may have problems but at least they always come up with a complete solution. I recall the first year of the W210 also had its fair share of issues. The rattles and squeaks in our Honda on the other hand...
The G35 is much nicer than the Accord. However, I totally agree the interior really annoys me.
Most German cars may have problems but at least they always come up with a complete solution. I recall the first year of the W210 also had its fair share of issues. The rattles and squeaks in our Honda on the other hand...
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
I drove the CDI and my major concern was the brake pedal feel and power lag when stepping hard on the gas pedal. I don't know if it was turbo lag or what but it felt like the engine response was a bit out of sync with what my right foot was doing (which is pretty much how the brakes felt too!).
If they could clean that up I'd buy the car because on paper it delivers what I'm looking for. I like the interior and the styling is nice. I just didn't feel it was responsive enough in the stop and go area.
If they could clean that up I'd buy the car because on paper it delivers what I'm looking for. I like the interior and the styling is nice. I just didn't feel it was responsive enough in the stop and go area.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 11
From: GMT -8 hours
Mercedes-Benz
The doors on the G sound like crap! My friend's 97 S320 on the other hand sounds incredible when u shut the door. Feels like it hits a pillow of door seals, i love it. i think the W220 sounds nice when u shut the door.
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
I would agree the 97 S class is solid but the new model is a tin can by comparison. With the window in the down position a door shutting sounds has an afterrattle you can't miss. The dashboard is built by A.C. Delco and looks it and the sheet metal is so thin you can indent it with your thumb! When I looked at the car it came with the goofy Command system and a nav unit that was useless (but you had to pay for) while a CDplayer wasn't even standard!!!! All for only 80K!!!
Hurry up and grab one while their hot!
Hurry up and grab one while their hot!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
2000 W210 E55->2003 R230 SL500->2004 W211 E55->2007 997TT+2007 E63->2010 GLK350->2012 E550 4matic
COMAND is not bad, you have to experience iDrive to realize the former's virtue!
The bottom line is, given a brand new 1997 S-class and a brand new 2004 S-class, both with the same warranty at the same price, most would pick the latter, myself included.
There is more to a car's strength and overall quality than how the doors sound like when you close them with the windows down. Take them out for an overnight test drive!
The bottom line is, given a brand new 1997 S-class and a brand new 2004 S-class, both with the same warranty at the same price, most would pick the latter, myself included.
There is more to a car's strength and overall quality than how the doors sound like when you close them with the windows down. Take them out for an overnight test drive!
Last edited by W210; May 17, 2004 at 07:18 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,348
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
2014 BMW 550i
I always was immensly impressed with the prevous generation E's integrity of the doors. Just holding the door handle on the inside, it felt like a solid piece of metal that was one with the door. Compare that to the new E, or the current S, which is crap.
I remember going to one of those driving events that MB held, and taking the cars on a spirited drive through the course they set up. I judged the E (this was a couple of years ago, so it was the previous generation) as being the best handling and *feel*, since it did have the tightest structure, especially when compared with the S (whcih I could see the dash moving, seriously), and the C which should have had the handling advantage.
I remember going to one of those driving events that MB held, and taking the cars on a spirited drive through the course they set up. I judged the E (this was a couple of years ago, so it was the previous generation) as being the best handling and *feel*, since it did have the tightest structure, especially when compared with the S (whcih I could see the dash moving, seriously), and the C which should have had the handling advantage.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 14
From: Houston, Texas - USA
2009 C63 AMG
If MB kept making cars like they used to, yes it would have good sounding doors, but they would also be much more expensive, lots more. Back in the mid 80's a 300E went for $35K. Not bad that the 2004's go for $50K. And with a lot more content to boot.
