E65 !!
Maybe this forum has members that should be assigned as board of directors to Mercedes-Benz as far as model-release decision makers go...
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://www.autospies.com/article/ind...&categoryId=10
... not that it's hard to find. This kind of one-upsmanship is a rarified game played by auto executives that has very little real-world meaning. It's like "Oh yeah? Your V-10 ain't nuttin' I'll put a V-12 in my mid-size sedan, so there!" Contrary to what AutoSpies says, an E65 would not "end the peeing contest once and for all." If the "rumor" (as AutoSpies puts it) of an E65 proves accurate, we can surely expect a BMW M5 6.0 in two or three years from now.
At least, here's news regarding the E60 wagon version: http://www.mbspy.com/211e60amg.htm
Last edited by Baby Jocko; Aug 6, 2004 at 01:58 PM.
The E65 would just be overkill, the E55K is more than enough of a contender for the M5..
The M5 has a highly tuned normally aspirated engine (over 100 hp/liter, although I can't figure out why they went V10 in a street sedan), electronically shifted manual gearbox, LSD, etc... It is much stiffer than any of its street versions. It is very extreme.
The E55 is a car a normal person can use to commute to work. The M5 can be used that way. But it extracts a penalty. If an E500 or a 545 auto is year current ride, you will like the E55, IMHO. However, if you think a 545 SMG is not enough...you want an M5.
Personally, for M5 $$$, I would spend my lira (euros?) on a Maserati Quattroporte.
The F1 engine is a 3 liter built to have the absolute minimum cross section and weight. There is no way that could be enlarged to a 5 liter. The F1 has cylinder heads that flow at 18000+ rpm, with the power peak there. They have pneumatic valve springs. And I'm sure different cam drives.
Other than both being BMW V10s, I'm pretty sure the Chevy LS1/2/6/7 have more in common with an SBC than the M5's engine has with a their F1 engine.






