Lexus LS430 vs E500
I still believe Lexus can better improve its navigation interface. When a specific address does not exist on its DVD, it should automatically jump to the closest address as it is annoying forcing the driver to re-enter a dummy street address just to get to the block.
I do not understand why the Mercedes navtech DVD does not have the same bug as the Lexus. I guess it's better off for users to enter a block address in these situations.
Yeah, I agree Bluetooth will be nice for someone who uses different cars on a regular basis. However, it is really important to get the features sorted out. Phonebook access is crucial!
Like i said in my previous post. I had 2 toyota navi system before, none of crashed on me and stopped working for no reason at all. Buggy? Sorry got to say this is BS.
Although command has not failed during the navigation. My W211 navi has crashed right from the start on both cars and will return when it wants to. W211 navi is not accurate, in fact none of the mercedes command navigation are accurate simply due to stupid block of address concept. Heck, it's even less accurate than old BMW CD-rom design.
A real world example. While taking my kid to a B-day party to pump it up in union city couple weeks ago. The mercedes block address setup would terminate just right after the turn onto whipple, leaving me searching entire block (about 6 buildings to find 2995 Whipple road). While the same address input in my van's nav points me to the right building complex. It's about 1/4 miles apart. Here is the simple truth.
Last edited by Dema; Nov 5, 2004 at 04:12 AM.
I still believe Lexus can better improve its navigation interface. When a specific address does not exist on its DVD, it should automatically jump to the closest address as it is annoying forcing the driver to re-enter a dummy street address just to get to the block.
I do not understand why the Mercedes navtech DVD does not have the same bug as the Lexus. I guess it's better off for users to enter a block address in these situations.
Yeah, I agree Bluetooth will be nice for someone who uses different cars on a regular basis. However, it is really important to get the features sorted out. Phonebook access is crucial!
It's not really a bug. It has to do how the discs and data point are packaged. Lexus/Toyota navi carries much more data point than MB. On the toyota/lexus disc (the US is sepearate into 11 regions, and canada is one big region). The amount of data point is about the same for each regions. Which should tell you how much less data are in the canadien region. There is only a limited amount of space on each disc. Too bad Canada just got sacrificed in favor of more detail data for the US. MB on the other hand i believe has much less detail data information for its data point as well as less category classification. Hence it could afford to have more street/address by number than toyota. It's simply a trade off on what data is more important.
In addition, lexus map is not solely based on nav tech alone. It also combines another source which provide detail maps for smaller city in US. In earlier version (such as generation 2 on my RX300, switching from navtech map to other source- merged on the same dvd disc, would often lead temporary freeze- couple second).
It's not a bug. Just one vendor decide to screw canada more in favor of getting more data for US.
Oakland Lexus is right by the stadium. And it shows on my map. I have never been to evergreen, winifred. but an address would be okay for me to try.
As of now, I just find the MB system much easier to use, especially when having to deal with addresses not found on the DVD. The MB automatically brings you to the block, the Lexus (at least in the RX330 in Canada), forces you to re-enter make up dummy house numbers in order to proceed.
As of now, I just find the MB system much easier to use, especially when having to deal with addresses not found on the DVD. The MB automatically brings you to the block, the Lexus (at least in the RX330 in Canada), forces you to re-enter make up dummy house numbers in order to proceed.
To me in US, this is not so much of a problem, since I have not yet once encountered this.
Also, i was able to find Lexus of oakland on 7293 Oakport fine today in my system. Was able to find it via address input as well as POI category search.
The problem i suspect is that DVD map updates at least once a year. The missing of address is simply data disc not up to date. This is a simple upgrade of disc. Typically speaking, you would update your map disc probably once every 2 years to make sure that you have good data for the navi.
This is going to be a problem with mercedes as well. Soon or later, the maps all become outdated and there is no way to get away from that.
It appears that there is an actual advantage with the address range input interface as it saves one from having to guess street numbers where there is no match. Since MB covers 4500-4599 as one entry, even if 4510 does not exist on the DVD, it still takes you to the block with no hassle.
In the RX330, it was particularly annoying when 4510 Cambie didn't work. We were forced to try 4508, 4512, 4520, 4550, etc., and it took us quite a few trial and error attempts to correctly guess an address that is on the DVD. Needless to say, we find the interface rather clumsy.
What Lexus should have done, was to follow MB and give a range when there is no specific match. This is the poor interface I'm talking about. Out of date DVDs will always be an issue, but the more intelligent interface will make life much easier.
Last edited by W210; Nov 6, 2004 at 04:13 AM.
BTW, I don't remember the Bimmer ever refusing to take an address, although it never showed me a range. Maybe its algorithm for what to do when it didn't recognize an address was to siliently substitute the closest one that it did know. That sounds like an even better solution than falling back to ranges, since it reduces the band of uncertainty.
Jim
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
545i!
<Flame Shield On>
BTW, I don't remember the Bimmer ever refusing to take an address, although it never showed me a range. Maybe its algorithm for what to do when it didn't recognize an address was to siliently substitute the closest one that it did know. That sounds like an even better solution than falling back to ranges, since it reduces the band of uncertainty.
Jim
It appears that there is an actual advantage with the address range input interface as it saves one from having to guess street numbers where there is no match. Since MB covers 4500-4599 as one entry, even if 4510 does not exist on the DVD, it still takes you to the block with no hassle.
In the RX330, it was particularly annoying when 4510 Cambie didn't work. We were forced to try 4508, 4512, 4520, 4550, etc., and it took us quite a few trial and error attempts to correctly guess an address that is on the DVD. Needless to say, we find the interface rather clumsy.
What Lexus should have done, was to follow MB and give a range when there is no specific match. This is the poor interface I'm talking about. Out of date DVDs will always be an issue, but the more intelligent interface will make life much easier.
Also, lexus does give you a range to input as well.
also, the 1st two pictures shows why MB's block method is horrible as it terminates way sooner than exact address.
BTW- the destination used in this example is so called missing lexus dealership in oakland. 7293 Oakport Street in Oakland.
Last edited by krispykrme; Nov 6, 2004 at 03:35 PM.
It should revert to range automatically (perhaps like the BMW system?), when the specific address does not exist!
Jim
It should revert to range automatically (perhaps like the BMW system?), when the specific address does not exist!
I admire the reliability of the cars and I admire the speed-to-market with which Toyota/Lexus has dominated their niche. Toyota/Lexus has also dumbed us into thinking we need bluetooth (sounds like crap), back up camera (say wha?), as well as copying features that MB and BMW innovated years ago (parktronic, distronic, heated rear seats, etc.).
To each his own...but the Lexus is a nice Toyota. How many people would buy them if they were badged as "Toyota LS430" or "Toyota GS430"?
Comparing service experiences between Lexus and MB owners is, unfortunately, embarrassing. If you can get past that, the MB is in a class all by itself.
I admire the reliability of the cars and I admire the speed-to-market with which Toyota/Lexus has dominated their niche. Toyota/Lexus has also dumbed us into thinking we need bluetooth (sounds like crap), back up camera (say wha?), as well as copying features that MB and BMW innovated years ago (parktronic, distronic, heated rear seats, etc.).
To each his own...but the Lexus is a nice Toyota. How many people would buy them if they were badged as "Toyota LS430" or "Toyota GS430"?
Comparing service experiences between Lexus and MB owners is, unfortunately, embarrassing. If you can get past that, the MB is in a class all by itself.
So very well stated.. I like it. You hit the nail right on the head!

A rose by any other name would not smell as sweet...
After I upgraded to v26 software in my BMW Navi, my mom told me that she preferred the BMW navi system over the Lexus navi.
I had to agree with her.. now only if MB can catch up, either that or make their stuff easier to hack/modify and release their code and what not public.
Last edited by Barry45RPM; Oct 18, 2005 at 12:36 AM.
545i!
<Flame Shield On>

Last edited by rjm; Oct 18, 2005 at 09:30 AM.
but it still has Toyota interior parts, and door handles!



