E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

CDI question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 10:24 PM
  #1  
apinti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: North Virginia
E320CDI, HKsound,Dinamic Vent Seats, Nav,Jade Black
Red face CDI question

Hi guys,

Just purchased a new 320CDI and I'm courious if any of the CDI owners have had any kind of chip upgrade and with what results? I appreciate your input.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 01:24 PM
  #2  
saffrontiger's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 416
Likes: 2
From: Lone Star State.
W211 2005 CDI, X166 2013 350 BT, 997.1 2008 C4S
First question why? Secondly, you are taking a big chance with warranty issues from MB unless financially this does not concern you. Give yourself a few weeks to "discover " the car. The CDI is an outstanding motor. You will love the torque and its power bandwidth. The mileage economy is an added bonus. Chip upgrades may produce significant power gains but at what cost?
Best Regards,
Jay
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #3  
Green E-300 DT's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 783
Likes: 1
From: Murrieta, Southern California
Late Built 2005 W-211 E-320 CDI
Thumbs up Good advise!



See Viesel's posts below: CDI Problems, enough was enough!

He had problems for months and had to remove his chip, and the dealer still hasn't found out what was wrong.

Wait and see if there is enough torque already. Then decide.
I think that you'll be more than satisfied with the 369 ft/lb.
Remember, yours should have more power (torque!) with additional mileage. This may take several thousand miles.

My older model only has only 244 ft/lb of torque, and once I learned how to drive it, I decided to not get it chipped. You don't wind them up, but allow the transmission to upshift early, and rely on all that low speed torque. To my way of thinking, you should be using the "C" position.

Wait and see before you "change the tune."

Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
apinti's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: North Virginia
E320CDI, HKsound,Dinamic Vent Seats, Nav,Jade Black
Red face

Thank you for your response guys. The more I think about it, the more I understand your wisdom. I just had to ask.... if you can understand that. After all, I am a rookie to diesels and this is my first merc which I intend to keep forever.

Last edited by apinti; Nov 16, 2004 at 09:47 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 10:02 PM
  #5  
ToyCollector's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: DFW
'05 E320 CDI, ‘10 E63, ‘13 SL63, Sprinter 170
I have recently gotten outside of break-in mileage and become quite comfortable with power delivery of the motor. I keep the tranny in Sport mode all the time. I race cars as a hobby. I have no desire whatsoever to chip this thing for all the reasons above and I see no need at all. This thing has some serious legs and is now delivering 26.7mpg city type economy with a hefty dose of torque when needed. I actually find the surge of torque off idle sometimes a little too unexpected.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 01:11 AM
  #6  
Green E-300 DT's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 783
Likes: 1
From: Murrieta, Southern California
Late Built 2005 W-211 E-320 CDI
Exclamation Exactly!



That's why I always leave my '99 in "W" which is the same as the "C" position in the CDIs.

To my way of thinking, these cars, and especially the CDIs, have too much torque at what, only 1600 rpm?
(Mine starts at 1800 rpm.) You reach those figures almost before the car starts moving from rest.
There is no need to use that first gear unless you are racing someone, or starting off going up a steep incline.

MBZ finally got smart and used 2.65s out back instead of the 3.07s that mine has.

Good luck, and enjoy that 369 ft/lb of torque (30 more than the E-500 BTW!)

Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 PM.