E500 Vs SL500
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
E500 Vs SL500
Hi
I am a newbie here....
As we dont have many E500's in the UK I was directed here for some advice.
Here goes: I currently drive an R129 SL500 which has covered nearly 70K miles and I have decided that its best to change car now whilst the SL still has some value.
Does anyone have any experience of the two cars? How does the E500 compare to drive to the SL500?? As of yet, I have not driven an E500, as the few cars that the UK dealers have are all too far away from where I live.
I am looking at a 2002 E500 in case that makes any difference.
Regards
Tan.
I am a newbie here....
As we dont have many E500's in the UK I was directed here for some advice.
Here goes: I currently drive an R129 SL500 which has covered nearly 70K miles and I have decided that its best to change car now whilst the SL still has some value.
Does anyone have any experience of the two cars? How does the E500 compare to drive to the SL500?? As of yet, I have not driven an E500, as the few cars that the UK dealers have are all too far away from where I live.
I am looking at a 2002 E500 in case that makes any difference.
Regards
Tan.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 2
From: Washington State
E-500
Originally Posted by Tanvir
Hi
I am a newbie here....
As we dont have many E500's in the UK I was directed here for some advice.
Here goes: I currently drive an R129 SL500 which has covered nearly 70K miles and I have decided that its best to change car now whilst the SL still has some value.
Does anyone have any experience of the two cars? How does the E500 compare to drive to the SL500?? As of yet, I have not driven an E500, as the few cars that the UK dealers have are all too far away from where I live.
I am looking at a 2002 E500 in case that makes any difference.
Regards
Tan.
I am a newbie here....
As we dont have many E500's in the UK I was directed here for some advice.
Here goes: I currently drive an R129 SL500 which has covered nearly 70K miles and I have decided that its best to change car now whilst the SL still has some value.
Does anyone have any experience of the two cars? How does the E500 compare to drive to the SL500?? As of yet, I have not driven an E500, as the few cars that the UK dealers have are all too far away from where I live.
I am looking at a 2002 E500 in case that makes any difference.
Regards
Tan.
However, it may be that the European version came out in the 2002 model year.
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by etenn
Are you sure that you are looking at a 2002? I think the 2003 was the first W211 E500.
However, it may be that the European version came out in the 2002 model year.
However, it may be that the European version came out in the 2002 model year.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 1
From: Irvine, CA
07 M6, 05 Noble, 01 S4, Smart ForTwo
Originally Posted by etenn
Are you sure that you are looking at a 2002? I think the 2003 was the first W211 E500.
However, it may be that the European version came out in the 2002 model year.
However, it may be that the European version came out in the 2002 model year.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 14
From: Torquay, England
E-class E300e Estate, Sprinter (stretched limo)
Hi Tan,
I think it unfair to compare the two. The SL500 is an excellent sports car, and the E500 an excellent family saloon.
The performance from the E500 with 5 speed auto is more than adequate. You also have the option of a smaller engined E-class a year or so newer with a higher specification.
You will find that our 2002 E-class is refered to by US owners as an 03 model, and these are the ones that have the most complaints.
Good luck with your decision,
John
I think it unfair to compare the two. The SL500 is an excellent sports car, and the E500 an excellent family saloon.
The performance from the E500 with 5 speed auto is more than adequate. You also have the option of a smaller engined E-class a year or so newer with a higher specification.
You will find that our 2002 E-class is refered to by US owners as an 03 model, and these are the ones that have the most complaints.
Good luck with your decision,
John
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 1
From: Irvine, CA
07 M6, 05 Noble, 01 S4, Smart ForTwo
Originally Posted by glojo
Hi Tan,
I think it unfair to compare the two. The SL500 is an excellent sports car, and the E500 an excellent family saloon.
The performance from the E500 with 5 speed auto is more than adequate. You also have the option of a smaller engined E-class a year or so newer with a higher specification.
You will find that our 2002 E-class is refered to by US owners as an 03 model, and these are the ones that have the most complaints.
Good luck with your decision,
John
I think it unfair to compare the two. The SL500 is an excellent sports car, and the E500 an excellent family saloon.
The performance from the E500 with 5 speed auto is more than adequate. You also have the option of a smaller engined E-class a year or so newer with a higher specification.
You will find that our 2002 E-class is refered to by US owners as an 03 model, and these are the ones that have the most complaints.
Good luck with your decision,
John
Trending Topics
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 14
From: Torquay, England
E-class E300e Estate, Sprinter (stretched limo)
Originally Posted by Brav
I would be hard pressed to call the SL an "excellent sports car"
Granted we all have different tastes and this was my personal opinion for a practical sports car used everyday and in the SL price range. I apologise for not being more explicit.
I include the Porsche which in my opinion is a better performing car, but for everyday use and comfort I personally would go for the SL, but each to his own, and I do not like insulting other folks choice of wheels. (except Hell-ona Yama-ha-ha)
Bye for now,
John
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes Teases Updated EQS With Steer-By-Wire and a Yoke
Verdad Gallardo
8 Mercedes Models With Poor Reliability Records
Verdad Gallardo
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 1
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
Originally Posted by Brav
I'd consider the SL more of a roadster or a GT
Lotus Elise = Sports Car
GT3 :drool: = Sports Car
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 14
From: Torquay, England
E-class E300e Estate, Sprinter (stretched limo)
Originally Posted by Brav
No flames intended.. 
I'd consider the SL more of a roadster or a GT
I'd consider the SL more of a roadster or a GT
I understand exactly what you are saying and I failed to correctly explain myself. It is the lack of choice in this country of 'sports' cars in that particular price range.
Jaguar? Not for me
Someone suggested a Lotus Elise Nice car for what it is, but a completely different price, and vehicle. Porsche, then see my previous post.
More a question for the English members, but what other cars in the SL500 price range would you say are better?
Lotus
L = Lots
O = of
T = Trouble
U = Usually
S = Serious
John
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento
'08 AM Vantage V8 - '03 E500
Originally Posted by Brav
No flames intended..
I'd consider the SL more of a roadster or a GT
I'd consider the SL more of a roadster or a GT
FIAT = "Fix it again, Tony"
BMW = "Break my window"
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 1
From: Irvine, CA
07 M6, 05 Noble, 01 S4, Smart ForTwo
Originally Posted by DWP
It just goes to show how little meaning the traditional terms used to describe car types now have, thanks to the makers and their advert agencies. Is a car with a minimal rear seat, like the SL, really a "roadster", or is it what's called (in the US, anyway) a "convertible"? Can any car with a rear seat and a steel roof be a "sports car", as Mazda and much of the auto press insist about the RX-8? Does anyone besides Mercedes and its flacks think that a car with four doors, the CLS, is a "coupe"? Questions, questions, with no answers.
FIAT = "Fix it again, Tony"
BMW = "Break my window"
FIAT = "Fix it again, Tony"
BMW = "Break my window"
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 8
From: Longmont, CO
04 E320 4 Matic, 95 Audi S6, 99 Carrera 4 Cabrio, 12 Fiat 500 Sport, 00 BMW R1200C 10, BMW R1200R
Originally Posted by DWP
FIAT = "Fix it again, Tony"
BMW = "Break my window"
BMW = "Break my window"
FIAT= Fehler In Alen Teilenn (defect in every part)
AUDI= Accelerates Under Demonic Influence
Chevrolet= Can Hear Every Valve Rattle On Long Extended Trips
FORD= Found On Road Dead, Fix Or Repair Daily
BMW= Big Money Waste
Thread Starter
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by glojo
Hi Tan,
I think it unfair to compare the two. The SL500 is an excellent sports car, and the E500 an excellent family saloon.
The performance from the E500 with 5 speed auto is more than adequate. You also have the option of a smaller engined E-class a year or so newer with a higher specification.
John
I think it unfair to compare the two. The SL500 is an excellent sports car, and the E500 an excellent family saloon.
The performance from the E500 with 5 speed auto is more than adequate. You also have the option of a smaller engined E-class a year or so newer with a higher specification.
John
Regards the smaller engined cars... you would be suprised. After doing some fairly extensive research the E500 is proving better value. As the E500 is not that popular here they can be picked up fairly cheapily. I would consider an E320 or 320 CDi but can not find one with the kind of spec that I want within my budget £30k.
The main reason that I want the E500 is that I love V8's and the speed... I miss it when I drive our S280.
Regards
Tan
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 14
From: Torquay, England
E-class E300e Estate, Sprinter (stretched limo)
Originally Posted by Tanvir
Hi John.
The main reason that I want the E500 is that I love V8's and the speed... I miss it when I drive our S280.
Regards
Tan
The main reason that I want the E500 is that I love V8's and the speed... I miss it when I drive our S280.
Regards
Tan
I totally agree with what you are saying, buying a motor vehicle is all about choice. Be it diesel, petrol, 4cylinder, or V12.
(mustn't forget to mention a certain type of in-line 6 cylinder engine )For the information of our US friends, when I first checked the Mercedes-Benz secondhand database there were TWO E500's for sale that were in Tan's price range. That is two in the whole of Great Britain. I must emphasis that this only applies to Mercedes-Benz dealers and up to a price range of £30,000, and it was at the beginning of last week.
The E500 is just not a popular vehicle in this country. (I included the estate version in the search, although I think Tan wants a saloon)
I have just had a quick check before typing this, and now there is only ONE. There might be a few more just above Tan's maximum limit that could be negotiated down?
Regards,
John
A nice sunny morning in Torquay
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY USA
05 C320 sport coupe
On performance #s aolne, the e500 is actually a tad bit faster on 0-60 and 1/4 mile times....basically the same...100th of a second quicker. I think the e class tranny and the sl weight has alot to do with that.
BUT they are different cars i have an e500 while my brother in law has an SL. His SL is in his driveway most of the winter or when he goes out with the family while I get to drive mine all of time.
I chose a sedan for that reason. I have kids and wanted to use my car as much as possible. Yeah I can drive my other car (GMC Envoy) but who wants to when you have a Benz parked next to it.
I almost bought a Lexus SC430 (2 seat roadster) but didnt for this reason.
While the SL is a more prestigious car and has the drop top feature it a matter of what YOU need and want.
BUT they are different cars i have an e500 while my brother in law has an SL. His SL is in his driveway most of the winter or when he goes out with the family while I get to drive mine all of time.
I chose a sedan for that reason. I have kids and wanted to use my car as much as possible. Yeah I can drive my other car (GMC Envoy) but who wants to when you have a Benz parked next to it.
I almost bought a Lexus SC430 (2 seat roadster) but didnt for this reason.
While the SL is a more prestigious car and has the drop top feature it a matter of what YOU need and want.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento
'08 AM Vantage V8 - '03 E500
Nobody has mentioned a major non-mechanical difference between the E and the SL, at least in the US, so I'll be the troublemaker who does. It has to do with gender stereotypes. Isn't the SL often stereotyped as a "woman's car"? I hesitate to use the term "chick car" because anyone who can afford an SL is not a "chick", but the SL (and now, the Lexus SC) do carry that baggage, fairly or not. I don't think that the E comes with any particular gender stereotype, or at least the W211s I see driving around have male and female drivers in about equal proportion. An E500 in black with the sport package is a fairly macho ride; whether an E500 in Desert Silver/Stone - our car - is XY or XX, I don't claim to know.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY USA
05 C320 sport coupe
I definitley disagree with yoy that an SL has a chick tag. SLK? maybe but not an SL or a SC430 for that matter. To be honest I see alot of middle aged woman driving e class cars around here, BUT I wouldnt say my E is a middle aged chick car.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
From: Canada
2004 E500 / 2001 C240
I would go with the E500 or an SL55 or SL65 and not the SL500.. I find that the SL500 looks as though it needs something else done to it to make it look complete (just my opinion).
I do like the ABC option though, and you get that with the SL55 and SL65.
I do like the ABC option though, and you get that with the SL55 and SL65.
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area, CA
11 W212 E350 Sport, sold 06 W211 E350
Originally Posted by Silvergt02
I definitley disagree with yoy that an SL has a chick tag. SLK? maybe but not an SL or a SC430 for that matter. To be honest I see alot of middle aged woman driving e class cars around here, BUT I wouldnt say my E is a middle aged chick car.
Can you add your city/country to your profile, so that "around here" has more relevance to us?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento
'08 AM Vantage V8 - '03 E500
Originally Posted by Silvergt02
I definitley disagree with yoy that an SL has a chick tag. SLK? maybe but not an SL or a SC430 for that matter. To be honest I see alot of middle aged woman driving e class cars around here, BUT I wouldnt say my E is a middle aged chick car.
The automotive press, in reviewing the new SLK, has also discussed how one of M-B's main objectives with the redesign has been to add testosterone (check out the phallic nose) and overcome the image of the previous SLK as a "chick car."
Incidentally, it's worth it to register for the LA Times online just to read Dan Neil's columns. He's the first journalist to win a Pulitzer for writing car reviews.
